Search

Purpose: To determine if eccentric exercise was effective, safe and feasible in increasing function and quality of life in people with heart failure compared to usual care and a waitlist control group., Methods: A prospective, three-armed, parallel-design, assessor-blind, pilot randomised controlled trial with 1:1:1 allocation. Forty-seven participants (16 female; mean age 66 years) with mild to moderate heart failure were randomly allocated to either eccentric exercise, concentric exercise or a waitlist control group. Participants in the exercise groups completed twice-weekly exercise for eight weeks. Primary outcome was walking capacity. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, leg strength and fatigue. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post intervention and three-month follow-up. Attendance, tolerability and adverse events were used to determine safety and feasibility., Results: Intention-to-treat analysis showed no differences between eccentric exercise and either concentric exercise or waitlist for any outcome. Per-protocol analysis found improvements identified by the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire were significantly greater post-intervention for eccentric exercise compared to concentric exercise (-17.99 units, 95% confidence interval -35.96 to -0.01). No major adverse events were reported., Conclusion: In this small trial, eccentric exercise did not demonstrate superior outcomes to concentric exercise or a waitlist control group., Clinical Trial Registration: The protocol for this trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT02223624, registration date: 22 August 2014.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRegular physical activity and referral to rehabilitation is recommended for people with chronic heart failure, however exercise can be challenging for this group.Eccentric exercise was safe and tolerable for participants with heart failure.Documentation of exercise progression is important to demonstrate a dose-response relationship.In this study there were no differences between groups who received eccentric exercise, concentric exercise or no exercise.

Purpose: To determine the effects of sit-to-stand exercise programs on patient-related outcomes in people with physical impairments due to health conditions. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered prospectively. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen the titles and abstracts of articles identified using the key search terms of sit-to-stand and exercise. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The methodological quality of papers was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: A total of eight trials were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using four of the trials that focused on patients with neurological conditions. There was moderate-quality evidence that sit-to-stand exercise programs improve sit-to-stand performance, but no evidence from another meta-analysis that sit-to-stand training improved balance for patients with neurological conditions. There was also no evidence from individual trials that positive changes occurred in the outcomes of gait speed and distance, lower limb muscle strength, falls, or participation. Conclusions: Sit-to-stand training could be a useful intervention when patients have limited sit-to-stand function and the aim of treatment is to improve this performance.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSit-to-stand training could be a useful intervention for patients when the aim is to improve sit-to-stand performance.Sit-to-stand training may not be a useful intervention when the aim is to improve other functions such as balance.

Purpose: Evaluate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the one-repetition maximum strength test in people with chronic heart failure., Design: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study., Setting: A public tertiary hospital in northern metropolitan Melbourne., Participants: Twenty-four participants (nine female, mean age 71.8 ± 13.1 years) with mild to moderate heart failure of any aetiology., Methods: Lower limb strength was assessed by determining the maximum weight that could be lifted using a leg press. Intra-rater reliability was tested by one assessor on two separate occasions . Inter-rater reliability was tested by two assessors in random order., Statistical Analyses: Intra-class correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Bland and Altman analyses were also conducted, including calculation of mean differences between measures ( ¯ d ) and limits of agreement ., Results: Ten intra-rater and 21 inter-rater assessments were completed. Excellent intra-rater (intra-class correlation coefficient 2,1 0.96) and inter-rater (intra-class correlation coefficient 2,1 0.93) reliability was found. Intra-rater assessment showed less variability (mean difference 4.5 kg, limits of agreement -8.11 to 17.11 kg) than inter-rater agreement (mean difference -3.81 kg, limits of agreement -23.39 to 15.77 kg)., Conclusion: One-repetition maximum determined using a leg press is a reliable measure in people with heart failure. Given its smaller limits of agreement, intra-rater testing is recommended. Implications for Rehabilitation Using a leg press to determine a one-repetition maximum we were able to demonstrate excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability using an intra-class correlation coefficient. The Bland and Altman levels of agreement were wide for inter-rater reliability and so we recommend using one assessor if measuring change in strength within an individual over time.

Purpose: To examine the validity and reliability of an activity monitor to estimate upper limb activity., Methods: Thirty-two adults after distal radial fracture were recruited. 15 adults performed five upper limb activities during two testing sessions, one week apart to investigate criterion validity against the criterion reference of three-dimensional motion analysis, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability. 17 adults in two therapy groups wore monitors for three consecutive days at baseline and six weeks post-intervention. Hypothesis testing (noninferiority) assessed comparison of group differences., Results: There were large, significant positive correlations between monitor counts and motion analysis for affected/unaffected wrists during the grocery shelving [r = 0.82, r = 0.73, respectively] and floor sweeping activities [r = 0.54, r = 0.59, respectively]. Large confidence intervals relative to means suggests the monitor could not accurately predict motion analysis distance or acceleration. Relative reliability was excellent in affected/unaffected wrists for crank ergometer [ICC (2,1)  = 0.91, ICC (2,1)  = 0.88, respectively], grocery shelving [ICC (2,1)  = 0.83, ICC (2,1)  = 0.89, respectively], and table dusting activities [ICC (2,1)  = 0.77, ICC (2,1)  = 0.83, respectively]. Correlations and reliability for typing were poor; hypothesis testing of group equivalence was not confirmed., Conclusions: There is preliminary evidence that an activity monitor is a valid and reliable tool to measure gross arm activity after distal radial fracture. Implications for Rehabilitation Distal radius fractures are one of the most common upper limb fractures that cause activity limitations and participation restrictions. After a distal radius fracture patients are often referred to therapy (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, hand therapy) for rehabilitation to return to pre-injury function and activity levels. Activity monitors may be a valid and reliable measurement tool that therapists can use with their patients to quantify gross arm activity to enable monitoring of injury recovery and rehabilitation adherence. Activity monitors may not be sufficiently reliable and valid to monitor fine movements of the wrist and hand after distal radius fracture.

Purpose: Primary purpose to determine if cultural and linguistic diversity affects health-related outcomes in people with stroke at discharge from hospital and secondary purpose to explore whether interpreter use alters these outcomes., Method: Systematic search of: Cochrane, PEDro, CINAHL, Medline, Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO and Ageline databases. Publications were classified into whether they examined the impact of diversity in culture, or language or culture and language combined. Quality of evidence available was summarized using Best Evidence Synthesis., Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Best Evidence Synthesis indicated conflicting evidence about the impact of culture alone and language barriers alone on health-related outcomes. There was strong evidence that hospital length of stay does not differ between groups when the combined impact of culture and language was investigated. Conflicting evidence was found for other outcomes including admission, discharge and change in FIM scores, and post-hospital discharge living arrangements. It is unknown if interpreter use alters health-related outcomes, because this was infrequently reported., Conclusion: The current limited research suggests that cultural and linguistic diversity does not appear to impact on health-related outcomes at discharge from hospital for people who have had a stroke, however further research is needed to address identified gaps. Implications for Rehabilitation The different language, culture and beliefs about health demonstrated by patients with stroke from minority groups in North America do not appear to significantly impact on their health-related outcomes during their admission to hospital. It is not known whether interpreter use influences outcomes in stroke rehabilitation because there is insufficient high quality research in this area. Clinicians in countries with different health systems and different cultural and linguistic groups within their communities need to view the results with caution as further investigation is required outside North America to ensure optimal and equitable care for these groups. In the absence of clear outcomes from high quality research, clinicians should ensure patients and their families have an optimal understanding of the health condition, the rehabilitation process and the service system, irrespective of language or cultural differences.

Purpose: To determine whether English proficiency and/or the frequency of interpreter use impacts on health outcomes for inpatient stroke rehabilitation., Study Design: Retrospective case-control study., Participants: People admitted for inpatient stroke rehabilitation. A high English proficiency group comprised people with native or near native English proficiency (n = 80), and a low English proficiency group comprised people who preferred a language other than English (n = 80)., Outcome Measures: Length of stay (LOS), discharge destination and Functional Independence Measure (FIM)., Results: The low English proficiency group showed a greater improvement in FIM from admission to discharge (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between groups in LOS, discharge destination and number of encounters with allied health professionals. Increased interpreter usage improved FIM efficiency but did not significantly alter other outcomes., Conclusion: English proficiency does not appear to impact on health outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation with a primarily in-house professional interpreter service. However, there is a need for a larger powered study to confirm these findings. Implications for rehabilitation People with low English proficiency undergoing inpatient stroke rehabilitation in a setting with a primarily in-house professional interpreter service, achieved similar outcomes to those with high English proficiency irrespective of frequency of interpreter usage. A non-significant increase of 4 days length of stay was observed in the low English proficiency group compared to the high English proficiency group. For patients with low English proficiency, greater change in Functional Independence Measure efficiency scores was observed for those with higher levels of interpreter use relative to those with low interpreter use. Clinicians should optimise use of interpreters with patients with low English proficiency when possible.

Purpose: To examine if individualised resistance training increases the daily physical activity of adolescents and young adults with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP)., Method: Young people with bilateral spastic CP were randomly assigned to intervention or to usual care. The intervention group completed an individualised lower limb progressive resistance training programme twice a week for 12 weeks in community gymnasiums. The primary outcome was daily physical activity (number of steps, and time sitting and lying). Secondary outcomes included muscle strength measured with a one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press and reverse leg press. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks., Results: From the 36 participants with complete data at 12 weeks, there were no between-group differences for any measure of daily physical activity. There was a likely increase in leg press strength in favour of the intervention group (mean difference 11.8 kg; 95% CI -1.4 to 25.0). No significant adverse events occurred during training., Conclusions: A short-term resistance training programme that may increase leg muscle strength was not effective in increasing daily physical activity. Other strategies are needed to address the low-daily physical activity levels of young people with bilateral spastic CP., Implications for Rehabilitation: Progressive resistance training may increase muscle strength but does not lead to increases in daily physical activity of young people with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and mild to moderate walking disabilities. Other strategies apart from or in addition to resistance training are needed to address the low daily physical activity levels of young people with bilateral spastic CP and mild to moderate walking disabilities.

Purpose: To systematically review and compare the daily habitual physical activity levels and sedentary times of young people with cerebral palsy to their typically developing peers and to physical activity guidelines., Method: After searching electronic databases, two reviewers independently applied criteria. Studies were required to include young people with cerebral palsy (up to 18 years) and to quantitatively measure habitual physical activity, defined as activity across at least one day. Data extraction was independently verified, and quality analysis completed by two reviewers., Results: Of 895 identified studies, six moderate to high quality studies were included. There were four measures of habitual physical activity. Participants were aged 5 to 18 years and typically had moderate to high gross motor function. Across all ages and levels of motor function, young people with cerebral palsy participated in 13% to 53% less habitual physical activity than their peers. Levels of activity were approximately 30% lower than guidelines. Sedentary times were twice the maximum recommended amount., Conclusions: Young people with cerebral palsy participate in significantly lower levels of habitual physical activity than their peers, and less than recommended guidelines. Long-term negative health consequences of inactivity such as metabolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease and poor bone density are therefore more likely.