Search

Background: Despite new medical and surgical strategies, 5-year local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma was reported in up to 25% of cases. Therefore, we aimed to review surgical strategies for the prevention of local recurrences in rectal cancer. Summary: After implementation of the total mesorectal excision (TME), surgical resection of rectal adenocarcinoma with anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision (APE) allowed decrease in local recurrence (3% at 5 years). More recently, extralevator APE was described as an alternative to APE, decreasing specimen perforation and recurrence rate. Moreover, technique modifications were developed to optimize rectal resection, such as the laparoscopic or robotic approach, and transanal TME. However, the technical advantages conferred by these techniques did not translate into a decreased recurrence rate. Lateral lymph node dissection is another technique, which aimed at improving the long-term outcomes; nevertheless, there is currently no evidence to recommend its routine use. Strategies to preserve the rectum are also emerging, such as local excision, and may be beneficial for subgroups of patients. Key Messages: Rectal cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach, and surgical strategy should be tailored to patient factors: general health, previous perineal intervention, anatomy, preference, and tumor characteristics such as stage and localization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pathological examination of early colorectal cancer specimens, in particular 'malignant polyps', provides important prognostic information. The depth of invasion into the submucosal layer assessed according to the Haggitt (for pedunculated lesions) or Kikuchi (for nonpolypoid lesions) classification systems or by direct measurement has been associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis. Angioinvasion, in particular lymphatic invasion, budding, tumor differentiation or grade, and resection margin status have been identified as further risk factors. The combination of these parameters allows the stratification of affected individuals into low- and high-risk categories, which is pivotal for clinical management. For low-risk cancers, defined as a completely excised Haggitt level 1-3/Kikuchi sm1 tumor with no evidence of poor differentiation or angioinvasion, local excision is generally regarded as adequate treatment. Oncological surgical resection is, however, indicated for high-risk cancers, which show at least one of the following features: Haggitt level 4/Kikuchi sm3 invasion, the presence of lymphatic (or vascular) invasion, poor differentiation, or positive resection margin. The inclusion of molecular markers such as tumor suppressor genes and their products, markers involved in tumor vascularization, and markers related to tumor cell adhesion and invasion may help to refine risk stratification, but data on molecular markers are still limited in this regard. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]