Search

Public interest litigation (Nikhil Soni vs. Union of India & Ors. Civil Writ Petition No.7414/2006) contesting the legality of the Jain fast to death, known as sallekhanā or santhārā, was filed in 2006. In response, the Rajasthan High Court issued a ban of the practice in 2015 which was quickly stayed by the Indian Supreme Court, where the case awaits a final verdict. The rise of the case through the courts and its surrounding controversy occurred parallel to the rise in widespread use of social media and messaging apps, resulting in a magnification of discourse and activism and thrusting Jains into a defensive public position that demanded a coordinated communal response employing "visibility tactics." Widening the picture of public discourse about santhārā to include these spaces, this article will explore how the technological mediations of Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram form a context-specific multilingual archive that indexes Jain sociality around the fast, including resistance to criminalization, anxiety about surveillance and regulation, and local and internal disputes. Unlike printed patrikas (communal newsletters), the speed, frequency, and reach of online media traverse national, state, and social boundaries. The article also describes how women have meaningfully accessed and shaped these new discursive spheres, such as virtual svādhyāya (self-study) groups and Jain-specific mobile apps, facilitating and transforming the spread of Jain religiosity and reimagining Jain geography as multimodal following developments in santhārā's symbolic and social power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]