Search

We investigated the real-world incidence of hypoglycemic events among patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1DM or T2DM) receiving insulin in routine clinical practice in China. In this observational study, data were collected electronically via the Lilly Connected Care Program (LCCP) electronic system from adults with T1DM or T2DM who had registered on LCCP between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2022, had used insulin for a full 12-week period following registration. The following outcomes were assessed during the 12 weeks following registration: incidence of level 1 and level 2 hypoglycemia. In total, 22,752 patients were enrolled. Among patients with monitoring data, over the 12-week study period, level 1 and 2 hypoglycemia were experienced by 48.8% and 25.9% of patients with T1DM and 26.5% and 13.9% of patients with T2DM. The proportion of patients treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs (OADs) capable of producing hypoglycemia (sulfonylurea or glinide) was 1.3% in T1DM and 1.6% in T2DM, respectively. Questionnaire data revealed that up to 92.5% of hypoglycemic events occurred outside of hospital and 18.6% were serious. These real-world data collected from Chinese patients with diabetes receiving insulin treatment reveal a relatively high percentage of patients experiencing hypoglycemia, with around one quarter of these events classified as severe and as many as 92.5% occurring outside of a hospital or clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: We assessed the impact of changes in body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (BF%), and waist circumference (WC) on prediabetes among Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults.Subjects, Materials and Methods: 2.5-year changes in BMI, BF%, and WC were calculated by subtracting baseline levels from follow-up, based on a cohort of 3,632 participants with prediabetes, and outcomes were defined as remission to normal glucose regulation (NGR), persistence in prediabetes, and progression to newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (NDM).Results: Among participants with prediabetes, 16.9% returned to NGR and 24.6% progressed to NDM. Changes in BMI, BF%, but not WC were associated with remission and progression of prediabetes (risk ratio per standard deviation increase of BMI: 0.86 [0.79-0.93] and 1.15 [1.08-1.23]; BF%: 0.91 [0.84-0.98] and 1.11 [1.03-1.19]). Among participants with combined impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), only BF% change was significantly associated with remission of prediabetes.Conclusion: Short-term management of BMI and BF% should be stressed to promote the remission and prevent the progression of prediabetes, regardless of whether someone is obese. Moreover, it is of particular clinical importance to monitor BF% among people with combined IFG and IGT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study explored the possibility of developing an alternative, simple and rapid test for the screening of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN), for use in local primary care facilities.Methods: 4023 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), aged 18-80 years, from 21 hospitals in China were screened for inclusion in a prospective diagnostic assessment of DSPN, between April 2011 and March 2012. Patients underwent nerve conduction study (NCS; as the gold standard) and clinical assessments of ankle reflexes (AR) and thermal (T), vibration (V), pressure (P), and pinprick (PP) sensations.Results: Results from various combinations of these clinical assessments were compared to determine the optimal screening regimens. The Toronto Consensus Panel definition was used to confirm clinical DSPN (symptoms or signs plus abnormal NCS). 3883 of the 4023 patients (M:F, 2162:1721; mean age, 56.79±13.16 years) were included. No significant differences were found between the two most efficient clinical assessment combinations, AR+PP+T+V and AR+T+V (P=0.9612). Compared to the diagnosis made using AR+T+V, the same diagnosis was reached using AR+PP+P+V+T in 100% of patients with probable clinical DSPN, 84.05% with possible clinical DSPN, and 96.84% with no DSPN. The AR+T+V assessment was also ∼40% faster than the AR+PP+P+V+T assessment.Conclusions: Combined AR+T+V assessment is a valuable tool for screening diabetic patients for DSPN, potentially decreasing costs to local primary care facilities and making care more available to underserved populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]