1. Incidence Rates of Type 2 Diabetes in People With Impaired Fasting Glucose (ADA vs. WHO Criteria) and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Results From an Older Population (KORA S4/F4/FF4 Study)
- Author
-
Oliver Kuss, Michael Roden, Karl-Heinz Ladwig, Wolfgang Koenig, Bernd Kowall, Rolf Holle, Christa Meisinger, Brenda Bongaerts, Wolfgang Rathmann, Cornelia Huth, Barbara Thorand, Christian Herder, Andreas Stang, Annette Peters, and Margit Heier
- Subjects
Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Medizin ,nutritional and metabolic diseases ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Type 2 diabetes ,medicine.disease ,Impaired fasting glucose ,Older population ,Impaired glucose tolerance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business ,Glycemic ,Cohort study - Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Expert Committee introduced impaired fasting glucose (IFG: 100–125 mg/dL [5.6–6.9 mmol/L]) as a category with an increased risk for diabetes (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) defined a higher IFG cut point of 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) because using the lower cut point would substantially increase IFG prevalence and there was no evidence it would lead to reduced progression to diabetes (2). Our aim was to estimate the long-term incidence of type 2 diabetes in people with isolated IFG (i-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT), and combined IFG/IGT. Contrary to previous studies, we split IFG into two subcategories (i-IFGlow: 100 to
- Published
- 2018