Search

Objective: To determine if insulin sensitivity is altered in prepubertal offspring exposed to a diabetic intrauterine environment., Research Design and Methods: Fifteen control children, 17 offspring of type 1 diabetic women, and 10 offspring of type 2 diabetic women, aged between 5 and 10 years, underwent a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT). Weight and height were measured, and body composition was calculated using bioelectrical impedance. Bergman's minimal model was applied to the glucose and insulin measurements to obtain values for insulin sensitivity (Si), acute insulin response (AIR), and glucose effectiveness (Sg)., Results: Si was lowest in the offspring of type 2 diabetic mothers, and AIR was highest in this group, although neither of these changes reached significance (Si, P = 0.2, and AIR, P = 0.3). Offspring of type 2 diabetic mothers had higher BMI SD scores (P = 0.004) and percentage fat mass (P = 0.002) than the children in the other two groups. The BMI SD score and percentage fat mass in the subjects, as well as maternal insulin dose, were negatively correlated with offspring insulin sensitivity., Conclusions: Intrauterine exposure to hyperglycemia by itself was not associated with alterations in glucose regulation in prepubertal offspring. Children of mothers with type 2 diabetes, however, were overweight, and they had a tendency for a reduced Si. The combined effect of genetic and postnatal environmental factors, rather than prenatal exposure to hyperglycemia, may place this group at risk for developing impaired glucose tolerance in later life.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the short-acting insulin analog lispro (LP) with that of regular insulin in IDDM patients treated with an external pump., Research Design and Methods: Thirty-nine IDDM patients (age, 39.4 +/- 1.5 years; sex ratio, 22M/17W; BMI, 24.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 22.5 +/- 1.6 years) who were treated by external pump for 5.1 +/- 0.5 years were involved in an open-label, randomized, crossover multicenter study comparing two periods of 3 months of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with LP or with Actrapid HM, U-100 (ACT). Boluses were given 0-5 min (LP) or 20-30 min (ACT) before meals. Blood glucose (BG) was monitored before and after the three meals every day., Results: The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced with LP than with ACT (-0.62 +/- 0.13 vs. -0.09 +/- 0.15%, P = 0.01). BG levels were lower with LP (7.93 +/- 0.15 vs. 8.61 +/- 0.18 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), particularly postprandial BG levels (8.26 +/- 0.19 vs. 9.90 +/- 0.20 mmol/l, P < 0.0001). Standard deviations of all the BG values (3.44 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.80 +/- 0.10 mmol/l, P = 0.0001) and of postprandial BG values (3.58 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.84 +/- 0.10 mmol/l. P < 0.02) were lower with LP. The rate of hypoglycemic events defined by BG < 3.0 mmol/l did not significantly differ between LP and ACT (7.03 +/- 0.94 vs. 7.94 +/- 0.88 per month, respectively), but the rate of occurrences of very low BG, defined as BG < 2.0 mmol/l, were significantly reduced with LP (0.05 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.19 per month, P < 0.05). At the end of the study, all but two (95%) of the patients chose LP for the extension phase., Conclusions: When used in external pumps, LP provides better glycemic control and stability than regular insulin and does not increase the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes.

Objective: Since 1985, we have used indwelling catheters (Insuflon, Maersk Medical, Lynge, Denmark; Chronimed, Minnetonka, MN) to lessen pain when injecting insulin. However, some patients experience a rise in blood glucose after using indwelling catheters for a few days. We therefore studied the absorption of 125I-labeled insulin when using indwelling catheters., Research Design and Methods: Five men and five women participated (age 18-25 years, C-peptide negative, HbA1c 9.0 +/- 1.0% [mean +/- SD, DCA-2000 method], diabetes duration 5-21 [median 9.5] years). After thyroid blockage with potassium iodide, we injected 5IU of 125I-labeled short-acting insulin subcutaneously in the abdomen ("ordinary injection") and 5 IU on the contralateral side through an indwelling catheter ("catheter injection"). The injection/insertion area was free of lipohyper- and lipohypotrophies. Disappearance rate was measured for 180 min with a gamma camera. The patients injected all premeal injections of short-acting insulin through the same indwelling catheter in the following 4 days. The investigation procedure was repeated day 3 and 5., Results: We found no statistically or clinically (95% CI) significant difference in residual activity of 125I-insulin after 60 min or in time for 50% of the injected depot to disappear (T-50%) among catheter injections on day 1, 3, and 5; ordinary injections on days 1, 3, and 5; or catheter and ordinary injections on days 1, 3, and 5, respectively. HbA1c correlated both to T-50% (r = 0.73, P = 0.016) and residual activity of 125I-insulin after 60 min (r = 0.69, P = 0.028), indicating that patients with a slower absorption will have a less ideal metabolic control when using premeal bolus injections., Conclusions: We conclude that using indwelling subcutaneous catheters for insulin injections for up to 4 days does not affect the absorption of short-acting insulin.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effect of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin injection on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and systemic glucose utilization (Rd) in patients with NIDDM., Research Design and Methods: Eight male volunteers with NIDDM, each of whom had a programmable-rate, implantable insulin pump, were given an injection of insulin (0.15 units/kg body wt) by intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injection on separate days in randomized order. Plasma glucose was kept constant for 5 h using the glucose clamp technique, and HGP and Rd were measured using isotope dilution., Results: Intraperitoneal insulin injection resulted in higher and earlier peak systemic insulin concentrations (1,469 +/- 245 vs. 454 +/- 48 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Glucose Rd doubled within 1 h after intraperitoneal injection and was greater than that attained with subcutaneous injection (3.91 +/- 0.27 vs. 2.60 +/- 0.19 mg.kg-1.min-1, P < 0.01). Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections suppressed HGP and plasma free fatty acid to a similar extent during the first 3 h, effects tht persisted through 5 h after subcutaneous insulin injection but waned 3-4 h after intraperitoneal injection., Conclusions: In patients with NIDDM, intraperitoneal insulin injection achieves more rapid and greater peak values for stimulation of glucose Rd than subcutaneous insulin injection. With regard to HGP and lipolysis, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections achieve similar initial suppression but this is maintained for a more limited duration with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous injection. These differences in insulin action seem directly related to the rapidity of insulin absorption with intraperitoneal injection.

Objective: To study the absorption rate of rapid-acting insulin from subcutaneous injection sites in nonobese and obese non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients., Research Design and Methods: Ten nonobese and 10 obese NIDDM patients (body mass indexes 24.1 +/- 0.4 and 31.4 +/- 0.8 kg/m2, respectively) received four subcutaneous injections of 125I-labeled rapid-acting insulin (Actrapid Human, 5 U): three in the abdominal wall above, lateral to, and below the umbilicus; and one in the thigh. The depth of the subcutaneous fat layer was measured using ultrasound techniques. The residual radioactivity was monitored externally for 270 min., Results: The disappearance half-life of 125I-insulin was between 4 and 6 h from all injection sites, with the exception of the upper abdominal area in the nonobese subjects, where it measured approximately 3 h. The residual radioactivity did not differ between nonobese and obese patients measured from any of the sites. In the nonobese group, the most rapid absorption of 125I-insulin was found from the upper abdominal area and the slowest from the thigh. In the obese group, the absorption rates did not differ between sites. No correlation was found between the depth of the fat layer and the residual radioactivity when measured at any site., Conclusions: Our results indicate that the absorption of rapid-acting insulin is markedly slow in both obese and nonobese NIDDM patients compared with IDDM patients and healthy subjects studied previously. In the nonobese group, the most rapid absorption of 125I-insulin is obtained after injection into the upper abdominal area. Inter- and intraregional differences are small in the obese patients. Consequently the choice of injection site is of little importance in this group.

Nowadays, human insulin is used daily by millions of diabetic patients. The biological effect of human insulin is comparable to that of porcine insulin. However, after subcutaneous injection, pharmacological and clinical studies showed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between human and animal insulins. Human insulin tends to have faster absorption and shorter duration of action compared with animal insulin. These differences are more pronounced and can be of clinical relevance with intermediate- and long-acting insulin preparations. Optimal metabolic control can be achieved with either human or highly purified animal insulin preparations, provided appropriate insulin replacement strategies are used.

Objective: To determine the influence of local adiposity on insulin depot size during CSII at basal rate., Research Design and Methods: In 27 diabetic patients, a constant infusion of 125I-labeled Actrapid insulin was given, with U-40 insulin at a rate of 1.12 IU/h in 20 patients, and U-100 at a rate of 1 IU/h in 7 patients. After 16 h of infusion, the steady-state depot size was measured by external counting, and the local skin fold was measured with a Harpenden skin-fold caliper., Results: U-40 insulin infusion resulted in a steady-state depot size of 5.1 U (2.1-10.9 U), and a corresponding skin-fold thickness of 17.8 mm (5-34 mm). A positive correlation was found between depot size and skin-fold thickness. A similar correlation was observed with U-100 insulin., Conclusions: During basal rate CSII, large variations in local skin-fold thickness create large variations in the steady-state depot size, which is partly predictable just by lifting the skin fold.

Objective: To evaluate the interrelationships between the rate of absorption of soluble insulin, SCBF, and anthropometry in normal subjects., Research Design and Methods: In 12 normal men (age range 23-30 yr, BMI 18.2-41.3 kg/m2), simultaneous assessment of the absorption of 125I-labeled soluble insulin and SCBF (99mTc clearance) was performed, on separate study days, for the anterior abdominal wall, anterior midthigh, and the upper arm sites. Each site was examined in a randomized order on two separate occasions. Absorption of 125I-soluble insulin was determined by external monitoring of residual radioactivity levels at the injection site for 6 h postinjection. Residual radioactivity level-time curves, including the characteristic early phase of slow absorption of soluble insulin (the lag phase), were described using two- and three-parameter biexponential models. Anthropometric measurements included BMI, ultrasonic measurement of the subcutaneous adipose tissue layer, and caliper skin fold thickness at the anterior abdominal wall, biceps, triceps, anterior midthigh, and subscapular sites., Results: A highly significant positive relationship was observed between the rate of absorption of 125I-soluble insulin and SCBF (rS = 0.44-0.52; P < 0.01-0.001). The duration of the lag phase was inversely correlated with SCBF (rS = 0.34 - 0.51; P < 0.01-0.001). Inverse relationships also were observed for the subjects' degree of adiposity with the rate of soluble insulin absorption (rS = -0.43(-)-0.71; P < 0.001) and SCBF (rS = -0.27(-)-0.62; P < 0.05-0.001). Significantly shorter lag phase was observed for the abdominal site compared with thigh and arm injection sites (P < 0.05-0.01)., Conclusions: The rate of absorption of soluble insulin, including during the lag phase, is positively correlated with SCBF. Increasing adiposity prolongs the duration of the early lag phase and reduces the rate of absorption of soluble insulin and SCBF.

Objective: To evaluate whether an insulin regimen with a long-acting zinc insulin (Ultratard HM) could help control fasting hyperglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients., Research Design and Methods: A randomized sequential crossover trial with 6-wk treatment periods was used. Ten IDDM patients from the diabetes clinic at the Medical School who had persistent fasting hyperglycemia (greater than 10 mmol/L) were studied. Patients with nocturnal hypoglycemia were excluded. All patients completed the study. Insulin regimens consisted of three daily injections of a short-acting insulin (Actrapid HM) before meals and either a long-acting zinc insulin (Ultratard HM) or an intermediate isophane insulin (Protaphane HM) before the evening meal. Each regimen was followed for 6 wk., Results: Fasting blood glucose levels (at 06:00 and 08:00) were significantly lower after the long-acting insulin regimen (6.26 +/- 0.88 vs. 10.82 +/- 4.27 mM, P less than 0.05 and 9.26 +/- 1.02 vs. 14.03 +/- 1.08 mM, P less than 0.05, respectively). Plasma-free insulin levels mirrored blood glucose concentrations because they were significantly higher at 06:00 and 08:00 after the long-acting insulin regimen (49.5 +/- 10.1 vs. 20.1 +/- 4.3 pM, P less than 0.05 and 31.6 +/- 5.0 vs. 16.5 +/- 3.4 pM, P less than 0.05, respectively). At any other time of the day, blood glucose and plasma insulin levels were not significantly different with either one of the two insulin regimens., Conclusions: A long-acting zinc human insulin injected before the evening meal can help to control persistent fasting hyperglycemia in IDDM patients.

The effect of injection technique on the absorption of subcutaneously injected short-acting insulin [125I-labeled Actrapid (MC), Novo, Copenhagen, Denmark] was investigated in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. In one side of the abdomen insulin was given with a fixed standard technique. In the other side of the abdomen the temperature of the injected insulin, the depth of injection, and the duration of injection were varied. Furthermore, we compared the absorption of U40 and U100 insulin by giving either 8 U of the two insulins or 0.1 ml of both insulins simultaneously to the patients in either side of the abdomen. With regard to the injection technique the only significant finding was a faster absorption rate with deep (12 mm) than with superficial (3 mm) injection. The absorption of U100 insulin was significantly slower than of U40 insulin, when given in the same amount (8 U) as well as in the same volume (0.1 ml).

The serum insulin, fractional absorption, serum human C-peptide, and plasma glucose responses of normal fasting subjects were compared after the subcutaneous and intravenous administration of human insulin (recombinant DNA) and Novo Actrapid insulin. While no statistical difference at each time point was observed between the two insulins, for each time point after 0.05 and 0.1 U/kg s.c., the 0-6 h area under curve (AUC) after the 0.05 U/kg dose was greater for human insulin than for pork insulin. There was no difference in the 0-6 h AUC after the 0.1 U/kg s.c. dose. The serum human C-peptide responses to the two insulins were virtually identical. With the 0.05 U/kg s.c. dose, hypoglycemic effect of human insulin was greater than for Actrapid. This difference did not occur after 0.1 U/kg s.c. Following intravenous administration using 0.05 U/kg, the serum IRI, serum C-peptide, and glucose responses were the same. These data indicate only slight differences between human insulin and Actrapid insulin.

In a patient with hyperthyroidism and newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), insulin action and clearance were studied before the initiation of antithyroid treatment and at 3-mo intervals for 1 yr thereafter. The sequential euglycemic clamp technique (5 mM) was used with insulin infusion rates of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mU.kg-1.min-1 in four steps of 2 h. The data were compared with nine control subjects and nine newly diagnosed euthyroid IDDM patients treated with insulin for 0.5 mo. Insulin sensitivity was increased in the patients (ED50 40 vs. 52 mU/L, range 43-70, in controls and 70 mU/L, range 59-120, in IDDM subjects). Insulin responsiveness was markedly elevated; the steady-state glucose infusion rate (SSGIR) of step 4 was 104 vs. 64 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (range 50-79) in controls and 61 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (range 47-69) in IDDM subjects. Insulin clearance was elevated in all steps (1-3, 20-23 vs. 9-15 ml.kg-1.min-1; 4, 18 vs. 6-12 ml.kg-1.min-1 in control and IDDM subjects). Parallel to the normalization of thyroid metabolism, insulin action (ED50 60 mU/L, SSGIR in step 4, 51 mumol.kg-1.min-1) and insulin clearance (steps 1-3, 11-14 ml.kg-1.min-1; step 4, 7 ml.kg-1.min-1) returned to the normal range in 6 mo. Both remained within the normal range until 12 mo. In the patient with newly diagnosed IDDM, the initial marked increases of insulin action and clearance were due to coexistent hyperthyroidism. With the amelioration of the hyperthyroid state, both processes became normal. The parallelism between insulin action and clearance suggests a functional relationship.

The large-scale clinical trials of human insulin (recombinant DNA) in the United States consisted of a "New Patient" study and a "Transfer" study. The "New Patient" study involved 101 patients (38% type I) who have never received insulin and who were treated with human insulin and followed for 6 mo using NPH insulin alone or in combination with Neutral Regular Insulin (NRI). Shortly after treatment, serum glucose and total glycohemoglobin concentration fell. No patients developed insulin lipoatrophy or insulin allergy. Two patients developed insulin hypertrophy; in one, it was transient. Intradermal tests to varying dilutions of human insulin did not change over 6 mo. In addition, there was no evidence of development of antibodies to Escherichia coli polypeptide. Two-hundred-and-forty-three patients, 91% of whom had type I diabetes, were transferred in a controlled double-blind study from mixed beef-pork or purified pork insulin (PPI) either to human insulin or back to their previous insulin treatment and followed for 3 mo. While insulin dosage did not change, there was a slight increase in fasting serum glucose and a statistically significant increase in fasting ketonuria. There was no change in the frequency of the complications of insulin treatment. These limited data are consistent with the conclusion that NPH human insulin is slightly shorter acting than its animal insulin counterparts. Overall, human insulin is a safe, effective insulin.

In order to test clinically a newly developed, simple, and convenient device for giving multiple injections of short-acting insulin (Actrapid HM, Novo, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), 16 type I diabetic patients previously stabilized on intensified conventional therapy regimens participated in a randomized crossover study for a period of 6 wk. The patients used conventional syringes for injections of short-acting insulin during one period and the new device during the other. Conventional syringes were used for injections of basal insulin during both periods. Metabolic control was assessed by twice-weekly blood glucose profiles, HbA1c, and the frequency of hypoglycemic reactions; no significant differences were found during the two treatment periods. No infections at the injection sites were seen. Patients' evaluation of the new device was very positive.

The efficacy of semisynthetic human insulin (HI) and monocomponent porcine insulin (PI) in treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was compared in 10 (PI) and 11 (HI) patients in a double-blind randomized study. Insulin (8 U/h i.v.), fluid replacement (0.65% NaCl and 5% glucose), and KCl supplements were administered according to a fixed protocol. Glucose, potassium, sodium, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and free-insulin concentrations were never significantly different during the study. At the start, mean +/- SD of pH was 7.10 +/- 0.14 in the HI group and 7.10 +/- 0.12 in the PI group. The time to reach arbitrary values for pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and beta-hydroxybutyrate was shorter during HI treatment, but the differences were not statistically significant. During HI treatment, the arbitrary value of 1.0 mM of acetoacetate was reached faster than during PI treatment (5.2 +/- 2.6 and 8.4 +/- 0.9 h, respectively; P less than .05). The concentration of acetoacetate was significantly different between the two groups after 6 and 7 h of insulin treatment (6 h: HI 0.82 +/- 0.50 mM and PI 2.19 +/- 1.65 mM, P less than .05; 7 h: HI 0.51 +/- 0.40 mM and PI 1.74 +/- 1.54 mM, P = .05). We conclude that recovery from DKA during treatment with HI might be slightly faster than during treatment with PI. If this difference is real, it does not seem clinically important.

This study, in 3 phases, compared the long-term acceptability and efficacy of insulin administered by nasal spray with an intensified subcutaneous regimen in nine type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects on baseline therapy with ultralente insulin. In phase 1, patients were begun and stabilized on a regimen of ultralente daily and Actrapid insulin three times daily. Phase 2 consisted of 4 mo of this intensified subcutaneous regimen. In phase 3, intranasal administration of insulin, with 1% (wt/vol) sodium glycocholate, replaced Actrapid insulin for 4 mo. Glycemic control was compared in each of the three phases. It was possible to maintain the dose of ultralente insulin relatively constant in only six of the nine subjects during the intranasal phase of the study. The six subjects showed a significant rise in glycosylated hemoglobin during the intranasal phase (10.4 +/- 0.6% intranasal vs. 9.1 +/- 0.3% subcutaneous, P less than .05) but not in plasma or urinary glucose levels. There was no significant change in the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes during intranasal insulin therapy in this group. The other three subjects were considered treatment failures. Six of the nine original subjects expressed a preference for intranasal insulin, and one subject complained of mild nasal irritation insufficient to cease treatment. The intranasal route of administration of insulin has the potential to replace short-acting insulin as an adjunct to longer-acting insulin in some insulin-treated diabetic patients.