Search

Background: Older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have unique health challenges and have not been specifically studied in previous closed-loop (CL) trials. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of CL compared with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in older adults with T1D. Methods: We conducted a two-stage randomized, crossover trial comparing 4 months of CL vs. SAP. Adults aged ≥60 years with T1D ≥10 years and using an insulin pump were eligible. SAP (with continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] alerts and optional insulin delivery suspension on low glucose) and multi-disciplinary education were provided during run-in, then CL and SAP stages were undertaken in random order. The primary outcome was CGM time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL comparing the final 3 months of each stage. Results: Thirty adults (mean±SD age 67±5 years, T1D duration 37±15 years and HbA1c 59±9 mmol/mol [7.6±0.9%]) participated. Ten participants (33%) had impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (Gold score ≥4); all were cognitively healthy, and none met the criteria for frailty. CGM TIR was 75.1±6.3% during CL and 69.0±9.1% during SAP (mean difference 6.2% [95% CI 4.3, 8.0]; p Conclusions: In this trial involving adults with T1D aged ≥60 years, CL increased TIR and reduced time below range compared with SAP, particularly overnight. The therapeutic benefit was evident even with relatively low baseline HbA1c. Further research is needed to understand the long-term clinical benefit. Disclosure S. A. Mcauley: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Sanofi. N. A. O’regan: None. V. Sundararajan: None. G. M. Ward: None. R. Macisaac: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novo Nordisk, Servier Laboratories, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk. S. Vogrin: None. S. Trawley: None. P. G. Colman: None. S. Fourlanos: Advisory Panel; Self; Pfizer Foundation, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company. C. Grills: None. M. H. Lee: None. A. Mohammad alipoor: None. D. N. O’neal: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Medtronic, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., GlySens Incorporated, Medtronic, Pacific Diabetes Technologies. Funding JDRF (3-SRA-2018-667-M-R); Diabetes Australia

Background: Faster-acting insulin aspart (FiAsp) may improve responsiveness of closed-loop (CL) systems and provide better postprandial glucose (PPG) management due to its more rapid onset and offset compared to insulin aspart (Asp). The Medtronic Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) System features auto-basal and auto-bolus functions. Aim: To compare PPG control using FiAsp vs. Asp delivered using AHCL. Methods: Twelve adults with T1D (median HbA1c 7.1% [IQR 6.8, 7.2]; 54mmol/mol [51, 55]) were assigned to FiAsp or Asp (unblinded) in random-order over two-stages (6-weeks duration each) using AHCL. Postprandial periods were defined using set time-blocks for breakfast (06:00-10:00); lunch (11:00-15:00); and dinner (17:00-21:00), based on conventional meal-times and meal distribution. CGM data was analyzed using signed-rank test. Results: With all postprandial time-block data aggregated, FiAsp demonstrated greater overall time-in-range (TIR) (70-180mg/dL) (p=0.028) and less hyperglycaemia (p=0.041) compared with Asp (Table). TIR was greater during lunch (p=0.034) for FiAsp vs. Asp, with no difference during breakfast or dinner. Over the 6-week duration, FiAsp use trended towards greater TIR vs. Asp (82.7% vs. 80.4%, p=0.07). Conclusions: FiAsp appears to confer an advantage compared with Asp for PPG control whilst using AHCL even in subjects with high overall TIR. Disclosure M.H. Lee: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Medtronic. S. Vogrin: None. B. Paldus: Research Support; Self; JDRF. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Australian Diabetes Society, Medtronic. D. Morrison: None. D. Zaharieva: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Ascensia Diabetes Care, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic. J. Lu: None. H. Jones: None. S.A. Wyatt: Other Relationship; Self; Medtronic, Ypsomed AG. E. Netzer: None. C.M. Sims: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medtronic. R. MacIsaac: None. B. Grosman: Employee; Self; Medtronic. A. Roy: Employee; Self; Medtronic. N. Kurtz: Employee; Self; Medtronic. A. Jenkins: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Abbott, GlySens Incorporated, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis. D.N. ONeal: None.

Background: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) technology has improved glycemia in people with diabetes. However, user burden including frequent calibration, and reinsertion of short-term devices limits adoption of this technology. Aim: Our objective was to retrospectively analyze CGM data from a fully implanted prototype sensor to assess feasibility of an extended calibration interval. Methods: The Eclipse® ICGM® System was surgically inserted in the lower abdomen, superficial to the rectus muscle sheath (Figure 1) in 6 adults with T1 diabetes, Mean (SD) age 42(12) years; 33% Females, HbA1c 7.1% (1.2)%/54(13) mmol/mol. For 6 months participants self-monitored blood glucose 4 times/day and wore a Dexcom G5 CGM. In addition, monthly clinic visits include meal-tests with frequent sampling YSI plasma glucose for paired analyses. Analyses of investigational device CGM data was retrospective against benchmark measurements. Results: There were no device associated adverse events. Data from three participants demonstrate intervals of 30, 48 and 85 days between calibrations without impacting overall performance. Preliminary measures show clinically relevant accuracy of >95 % within the A+B ranges. Conclusion: Interim data supports extended interval calibration for the fully implanted prototype Eclipse® ICGM® System which holds promise of CGM with fewer device interactions and enhanced patient experience. Disclosure P. Gupta: Employee; Self; GlySens Incorporated. A. Butler: Employee; Self; GlySens Incorporated. K. Bertsch: None. H. Jones: None. M.H. Lee: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Medtronic. V.R. Obeyesekere: None. S.L. Martha: None. A. Jenkins: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Abbott, GlySens Incorporated, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis. D.N. ONeal: None.

Background: Few long-term RCTs compare Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) insulin delivery to manual (non-HCL) insulin dosing in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Objective: To examine glycemic and psychosocial outcomes in adults with T1D using HCL vs. manual insulin dosing with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for 6 months. Methods: Adults using multiple daily injections or pumps with SMBG were randomized 1:1 after insulin dose optimization to 26 weeks of HCL (Medtronic 670G) or continuation of current therapy. The primary outcome was time in target range (70-180mg/dL) with masked CGM during the final 3 weeks. Secondary outcomes included other CGM metrics, HbA1c, treatment satisfaction (DTSQs) and diabetes distress (PAID). Intention to treat analysis was performed with ANCOVA or rank sum test. Results: HCL and control groups were well balanced at baseline (Table). At 26 weeks, mean (95% CI) CGM time in range with HCL was greater by 14.8% (11.1, 18.5), with reduced high and low glucose time, and lower HbA1c. There were no between-group differences in treatment satisfaction or diabetes distress (Table). Conclusions: HCL provided a significant and sustained glycemic benefit compared with standard therapy. Results will inform potential users and health professionals and a cost-benefit analysis may facilitate HCL access. Disclosure S.A. McAuley: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Roche Diabetes Care. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care. M.H. Lee: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Medtronic. B. Paldus: Research Support; Self; JDRF. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Australian Diabetes Society, Medtronic. S. Vogrin: None. M.B. Abraham: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Lilly Diabetes. L. Bach: None. M. Burt: None. N. Cohen: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes. Research Support; Self; Ypsomed AG. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. P.G. Colman: None. E.A. Davis: None. C. Hendrieckx: None. M. de Bock: None. J. Holmes-Walker: None. J. Kaye: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. K. Kumareswaran: None. R. MacIsaac: None. R.W. McCallum: None. C.M. Sims: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medtronic. J. Speight: Research Support; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; American Diabetes Association, Australian Diabetes Society, Roche Diabetes Care. S. Stranks: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi-Aventis. S. Trawley: None. V. Sundararajan: None. G. Ward: None. A.C. Keech: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen, Kowa Research Institute, Inc. Consultant; Self; Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott, Amgen. A. Jenkins: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Abbott, GlySens Incorporated, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis. T. Jones: Other Relationship; Self; Medtronic. D.N. ONeal: None.

Background: A missed or late meal insulin bolus can impact glycemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Aim: To study glucose control after missed and late meal boluses in T1D adults using a prototype enhanced hybrid closed-loop (E-HCL) system (Medtronic) providing automated basal insulin and correction boluses. Methods: Twelve T1D adults (median HbA1c 6.8% [IQR 6.2-7.2] | 51mmol/mol [44-55] participated. After 1-week run-in at home in Open Loop, E-HCL was activated during 1-week supervised hotel phase followed by 3 weeks free-living at-home. Participants consumed a standardized 40g carbohydrate dinner in the supervised phase. Four hours of post-prandial glucose data following a standard bolus pre-meal in E-HCL at home were compared in a pairwise manner to 1) Pre-meal bolus in Open Loop Run-In; 2) 20minute Late bolus in E-HCL supervised; 3) Missed bolus in E-HCL supervised using Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results: Late bolus was associated with mild hypoglycemia and higher glucose variability; missed bolus was associated with hyperglycemia (Table). Overall time in CL was 99.98%. E-HCL at home vs. Open Loop (run-in) had greater time-in-70-180mg/dL range (85.3 vs. 75.0%, p=0.003). There was no severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis. Conclusions: While glucose excursions were modest, the administration and timing of meal boluses influenced post-meal glycemia in well-controlled T1D adults using E-HCL. Disclosure M.H. Lee: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. S. Vogrin: None. B. Paldus: Other Relationship; Self; Australian Diabetes Society, JDRF, Medtronic. H. Jones: None. V.R. Obeyesekere: None. C.M. Sims: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medtronic. S.A. Wyatt: Other Relationship; Self; Animas Corporation, Medtronic. G.M. Ward: None. S.A. McAuley: Research Support; Self; JDRF, Medtronic. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Australian Diabetes Society, Eli Lilly and Company. R. MacIsaac: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc. Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc. B. Krishnamurthy: None. V. Sundararajan: None. A. Jenkins: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Australian Diabetes Society, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Abbott, GlySens Incorporated, Medtronic, Mylan. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. D.N. O'Neal: None.

Background: Hybrid closed loop (HCL) insulin delivery with the Medtronic MiniMed 670G system is safe and effective in improving glycemia for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Aims: To compare glucose control, CL exits and alarm frequency with standard HCL vs. enhanced HCL (eHCL) systems. Methods: Pump experienced adults with T1D (n=11; 9 women; mean[SD] age: 51[15]Y; HbA1c 7.5[1.0]%) were assigned in random order HCL and eHCL for 1 week each in a supervised live-in setting. eHCL incorporated enhanced bolus reminders and iterative changes broadening glucose and insulin delivery parameters permitting persistence in CL. For both HCL and eHCL insulin delivery was by a Medtronic pump with identical interventions (missed bolus, exercise, high GI and high fat meals), insulin action times and insulin-carbohydrate ratios implemented. The primary outcome was CGM time in target range. Results: eHCL resulted in fewer CL alerts and exits. Time in target and mean glucose favored eHCL but did not reach significance (Table). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. Conclusions: Iterative changes to the Medtronic HCL system resulted in trends towards improved glycemia, fewer CL exits and alerts without compromising safety, despite multiple food and exercise challenges during the study periods. Longer term studies at home are required to confirm these findings. Table: All results are Mean (SD); *NS= Not Significant.HCL (n=11)eHCL (n=11)pInsulin DeliveryTotal daily insulin (units/day)44 (18)47 (24)NS*Daily basal (%)55 (8)55 (7)NS*Daily bolus (%)45 (8)45 (7)NS*Daily insulin to carbohydrate ratio9.6 (3.1)9.6 (3.1)NS*Insulin action time (hrs)3.7 (0.6)3.7 (0.6)NS*Glucose Metrics% time in 70-180mg/dL69 (11)74 (10)0.16Mean sensor glucose (mg/dL)160 (13)151 (11)0.091Time 180mg/dL (%)29 (11)24 (9)0.37Time >250mg/dL (%)7.3 (5.6)6.1 (4.7)0.48Algorithm related Alerts and Dropout Alerts (n/week)8.6 (5.8)3.9 (2.8)0.01CL exits (n/week)3.5 (3.1)0 (0)0.004 Disclosure B. Paldus: None. M.H. Lee: None. H. Jones: None. S.A. McAuley: Research Support; Self; JDRF. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Australian Diabetes Society. J.C. Horsburgh: None. K.L. Roem: None. G. Ward: None. R. MacIsaac: None. N. Cohen: None. P.G. Colman: None. A. Jenkins: Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Mylan, Sanofi-Aventis. D.N. O'Neal: Research Support; Self; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi.