Search

Introduction: Risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other psoriasis treatments, including secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab; switching to risankizumab from other psoriasis treatments has shown superior clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of directly switching patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and a suboptimal response to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to risankizumab. Methods: This 52-week, phase 3b study enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with the recommended dose of secukinumab or ixekizumab for ≥ 6 months but did not achieve an optimal response (static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] 2/3; body surface are [BSA] 3– < 10%). Patients received subcutaneous risankizumab (150 mg) without washout. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sPGA of 0/1 at week 16. Secondary endpoints included sPGA 0/1 at week 52, sPGA 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, and Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) 0 at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: The study included 244 patients. sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 57.4% and 62.3% at week 16 and 52. At week 16, sPGA 0, DLQI 0/1, and PSS 0 were achieved by 20.5%, 40.2%, and 20.9%, respectively. At week 52, these proportions increased to 27.1% for sPGA 0, 47.2% for DLQI 0/1, and 27.5% for PSS 0. Most frequently reported adverse events (reported in ≥ 5% of patients) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection (8.6%) and nasopharyngitis (5.7%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: Directly switching to risankizumab improved outcomes and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had suboptimal responses to anti-IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab). The safety results are consistent with previously reported safety of risankizumab. This study supports the efficacy of risankizumab in patients previously treated with biologics, including IL-17 inhibitors, and suggests a direct switch to risankizumab for improved clinical outcomes and QoL. Clinical Trials: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04102007. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Data on generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in Poland are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics of Polish patients with GPP. In addition, the effect of the frequency of disease flares and the concomitant presence of psoriasis vulgaris (PV) on patient characteristics was evaluated. Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of patients hospitalized for GPP in dermatology departments of the Polish Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Group were analyzed. Results: A total of 90 patients from 14 dermatology centers were included. The median age of patients was 59 (range, 5–85) years, and most patients were female (68.9%). The most common comorbidity was hypertension (43.3%), followed by cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The median duration of GPP was 3 years, and the median number of flares was 2. Hospitalization was required in 67% of flares. The main triggering factors were drugs (20.5%) and infections (19.3%). Women and men with GPP differed in terms of age (p < 0.01), distribution of comorbidities, and selected triggering factors (stress: p < 0.05). Almost 25% of patients experienced more than one flare per year. Patients with different frequency of flares did not differ significantly in age, sex distribution, or comorbidities, but those with a higher frequency of flares had a shorter disease duration (median: 0.6 vs. 4.0 years; p < 0.01). In 59.1% of patients, GPP was accompanied by PV. Patients with GPP and PV were younger than those with GPP alone (median: 48.0 vs. 66.0 years; p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this study, the general demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with GPP were consistent with those described in other studies. However, a high rate of flares requiring hospitalization and a significant percentage of patients experiencing more than one flare per year indicate the unmet need in the management of patients with GPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Secukinumab has proven to be effective and safe in psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase 3 studies. However, data on real-world practice is limited. Methods: This study is an ongoing, multicenter, 2-year observational study that focuses on patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO, active PsA, or AS receiving secukinumab. The aim of this study is to present baseline data for the entire study population. Results: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, with 101 having PsO, 12 with PsA, and 14 with AS. Among the patients, approximately 54.0% were male. The mean body mass index ranged from 25.0 to 27.4 kg/m2 across all groups. Patients with PsO had the longest disease duration with an average of 11.0 years, followed by AS (3.0 years) and PsA (1.0 year). Previous biologic therapy was observed in 6.9–8.1% of patients. Baseline disease severity scores revealed moderate to severe disease. In the PsO group, the mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 16.1. For patients with PsA, the mean Tender Joint Count was 9.1, and the mean Swollen Joint Count was 6.7. In the AS group, the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score was 4.6, and the mean Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score was 3.7. Conclusion: The study demonstrates disease durations, disease activity, and treatment history in Thai patients that were generally consistent with previous randomized controlled studies. Long-term data on the efficacy and safety of the treatment will be presented in future publications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Biologic treatments have made complete skin clearance in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis a real possibility. Although clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of bimekizumab over secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, direct comparisons with other biologics are not available. This systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of bimekizumab versus other biologic systemic therapies for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: We conducted an SLR to retrieve published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsycINFO on 13 January 2022. Two NMA types were used to analyse the long-term achievement of 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100): (1) NMA of cumulative clinical benefits, based on the area under the curve, from week 0 to 52; (2) multinomial NMA at weeks 44‒60. Binomial NMA was used to evaluate long-term serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: The SLR identified 38 RCTs, of which 19 were included in the NMA. Bimekizumab 320 mg administered every 4 weeks to week 16 then every 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) showed a greater cumulative average number of days of PASI 100 response compared with all other biologics. These differences were statistically significant versus all biologics, except risankizumab 150 mg. The multinomial NMA demonstrated that interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were the most efficacious treatments. No significant differences were found in long-term occurrence of SAEs. Conclusion: Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W was superior to most other treatments in maintaining complete skin clearance during the first year of treatment. It demonstrated a greater cumulative average number of days with completely clear skin while displaying a comparable safety profile compared with all other biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite advancements in the treatment of psoriasis (PsO), there are few head-to-head studies assessing comparative effectiveness of the newest therapies approved to treat PsO. Our objective was to assess the comparative clinical effectiveness of risankizumab and deucravacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO. Methods: This placebo-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analysis utilized data from UltIMMa-1/2 risankizumab and POETYK PSO-1/2 deucravacitinib trials. Individual patient data from UltiMMA-1/2 were weighted via propensity score to match POETYK PSO-1/2 published summary data. Rate differences between risankizumab and deucravacitinib were assessed for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100, the Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA = 0 or 0/1), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1. Results: At 16 weeks, risankizumab-treated patients demonstrated statistically significantly higher rates of skin clearance and greater improvement in quality of life (QoL) compared to those treated with deucravacitinib. Across all outcomes, risankizumab demonstrated a lower number needed to treat compared to deucravacitinib. Limitations are potential bias due to unobserved/unmeasurable differences and limited generalizability of the results. Conclusions: This indirect comparison demonstrates that risankizumab has higher rates of skin clearance and greater improvements in QoL than deucravacitinib. This study will help inform healthcare providers in their treatment and management strategy of PsO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Poor persistence to biologics can result in suboptimal health outcomes and increased economic burden for chronic conditions, including psoriasis (PsO). In Japan, studies evaluating factors responsible for biologic treatment persistence in patients with PsO are limited. We assessed biologic treatment persistence (median treatment duration and overall treatment survival) and associated factors in patients with PsO in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective analysis of insurance claims records from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database included patients with PsO [International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code: L40.x] ≥ 18 years of age who had received biologic treatment. Treatment persistence was analyzed using data from 2016 to 2020 by biologic class and by individual biologics (infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) in bio-naïve (who initiate first biologic at index) and bio-experienced patients. Kaplan–Meier survival (treatment persistence), and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression (predictive factors) analyses were used. Results: Overall, 1528 patients with PsO were included (mean age 47.4 years). Infliximab had the longest median treatment duration (33.6 months), while brodalumab had the shortest (9.7 months) among biologics evaluated. Of the biologics evaluated, 1-year treatment survival was highest with guselkumab (83%), and lowest with brodalumab (45%). Bio-experienced patients showed slightly longer median treatment duration than bio-naïve patients (22.8 versus 18.1 months). Factors predictive of treatment persistence were sex [male; hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, p = 0.016] and specific PsO diagnostic codes, such as L40.0 (PsO vulgaris; HR 0.69; p = 0.006), L40.1 (generalized pustular PsO; HR 0.75; p = 0.034), and L40.9 (PsO unspecified; HR 0.72; p = 0.001). Meanwhile, age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were significantly associated with adalimumab and infliximab treatment persistence, respectively. Conclusion: Among biologics evaluated, infliximab had the longest median treatment duration, and guselkumab had the highest 1-year treatment survival. Sex and specific PsO diagnostic codes influenced overall treatment persistence. These findings could inform long-term treatment plans for PsO in real-world clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psoriasis, a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory disease, affects 2‒3% of the population. Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) mediates cytokine signaling involved in adaptive [interleukin (IL)-12, IL-23] and innate (type-I interferons) immune responses; IL-23–driven T-helper (Th)17 pathways play a key role in chronic inflammation in psoriasis. In a phase 2 trial, deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, reduced IL-23/Th17 and type-I interferon pathway expression in the skin of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, reductions that were accompanied by clinical improvement of psoriatic lesions. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers of psoriatic disease in serum from patients enrolled in the phase 2 trial and to assess the effects of deucravacitinib on those biomarkers. Methods: Serum biomarkers from Olink proteomics and other quantitative assays were evaluated for a pharmacodynamic response to deucravacitinib treatment and correlation with psoriasis disease activity measures. Results: Serum biomarkers associated with the IL-23/Th17 pathway [IL-17A, IL-17C, IL-19, IL-20, beta-defensin, and peptidase inhibitor 3 (PI3)] were upregulated in patients with psoriasis versus healthy controls. Deucravacitinib treatment reduced IL-17A (adjusted mean change from baseline at Day 85; 12 mg once daily versus placebo; −0.240 versus −0.067), IL-17C (−14.850 versus −1.664), IL-19 (−96.445 versus −8.119), IL-20 (−0.265 versus −0.064), beta-defensin (−65,025.443 versus −7553.961), and PI3 (−14.005 versus −1.360) expression. Reductions in serum biomarker expression occurred in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with significant reductions from baseline seen with deucravacitinib doses ≥ 3 mg twice daily (P ≤ 0.05). Biomarker expression correlated with disease activity measures such as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline. Biomarker expression also correlated with PASI scores at Week 12. Conclusion: IL-23/Th17 pathway expression in the serum of patients with psoriasis is an indicator of disease activity and response to deucravacitinib treatment. Trial registration number: NCT02931838. Plain Language Summary: Plaque psoriasis is a long-term disease that causes inflammation, scaling, and itching of the skin. Compared with healthy volunteers without psoriasis, patients with psoriasis have higher amounts of certain biomarkers (molecules that indicate what is happening in the body) in their blood that are associated with inflammation. Higher amounts of these biomarkers are also associated with more severe psoriasis. In a study of patients with psoriasis, those who received the oral drug deucravacitinib had lower amounts of biomarkers after 12 weeks of treatment compared with patients who received a placebo (a lookalike pill that contains no medicine). Patients who were treated with deucravacitinib also saw an improvement in their psoriasis after 12 weeks compared with patients who received placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With newer biologics, the achievement of complete skin clearance has become an attainable treatment goal for patients with plaque psoriasis. We evaluate how improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses, particularly at incremental improvements approaching complete skin clearance (PASI 100), translate into improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-perceived symptoms. Methods: Data from the BE RADIANT phase 3b trial (NCT03536884) and its open-label extension (OLE), pooled across all study visits and treatments over 16 weeks (randomised patients) and 2 years (patients entering the OLE), were analysed using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Proportions of patients achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1, DLQI item scores of 0, and Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM) item scores of 0 for itching, scaling, and skin pain at specific PASI improvement levels were estimated. Results: Seven hundred and forty-three patients were randomised to treatment; 654 entered the OLE. Using 16-week pooled data, there were incremental improvements in the proportions of patients estimated by our model to achieve DLQI 0/1 with PASI 100 compared with 95% (PASI = 95%) and 90% (PASI = 90%) improvements in PASI (93.0%, 89.3%, and 83.8% achieving DLQI 0/1, respectively). Estimated proportions achieving DLQI item scores of 0 had the greatest increases at higher PASI improvement levels for Items 1 (itchy, sore, painful, or stinging skin), 2 (embarrassment), and 4 (choice of clothing). Estimated proportions of patients achieving P-SIM = 0 were also higher for PASI 100 (itching: 61.7%; scaling: 82.2%; skin pain: 96.9%) than for PASI = 95% (50.8%; 72.3%; 95.7%) and PASI = 90% (39.8%; 59.5%; 94.0%). Similar benefits of incremental PASI improvements were estimated using 2-year data. Conclusions: Complete skin clearance translated into the greatest benefits to HRQoL and patient-perceived symptoms, over and above skin clearance between 90% and 100%, highlighting the importance of targeting PASI 100 as a treatment outcome for patients with psoriasis. Trial Registration Number: NCT03536884. 2APgg6-p_grKtG7KkQSkCG Complete skin clearance is associated with the greatest benefits to health-related quality of life and perceived symptoms for patients with psoriasis: KeyResults and Conclusions (MP4 72828 kb) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with alopecia areata (AA) may have received several therapies for management of AA during their lives. In the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 (NCT03732807) study, the oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients aged ≥ 12 years with AA and ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. This post hoc analysis investigated associations between prior use of AA therapies and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) responses in patients receiving ritlecitinib for AA. Methods: Patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 mg or 50 mg once daily with or without an initial 4-week 200-mg daily loading dose were grouped by previous exposure to AA treatments, including topicals, intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), topical immunotherapy, and systemic immunosuppressants or any prior AA treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between response based on a SALT score of ≤ 20 and any prior treatment for AA at weeks 24 and 48. Results: Of 522 patients, 360 (69.0%) had previous exposure to any AA treatment. At Week 24, SALT ≤ 20 response was positively associated with prior use of ILCS (odds ratio [OR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–3.65; P < 0.05) and negatively associated with prior use of systemic immunosuppressants (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.28–0.88; P < 0.05). Prior use of topicals or topical immunotherapy was not associated with SALT ≤ 20 response at Week 24. By Week 48, no association was identified between SALT ≤ 20 response and prior use of topicals, ILCS, topical immunosuppressants, or systemic immunosuppressants (all P > 0.05). Previous exposure to any AA therapy was not associated with SALT ≤ 20 response at weeks 24 or 48 (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Prior AA treatment history had no effect on longer-term treatment response to ritlecitinib. Trial Registration Number: NCT03732807. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease, associated with multiple comorbidities and psychological and psychiatric disorders. The quality of life of patients with this disease is severely compromised, especially in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Secukinumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody, was the first anti-interleukin (IL)-17 biologic approved for treating psoriasis. Secukinumab demonstrated long-lasting efficacy and a good safety profile in individuals with plaque psoriasis, and it is associated with an improvement in health-related quality of life. While there is evidence that early treatment with systemic therapy can affect disease progression and improve long-term outcomes in other autoimmune diseases, evidence is limited in psoriasis, especially in real-world settings. This review provides an overview of studies describing the effectiveness of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis summarizing the literature and focusing on real-world evidence and early intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis often begins in infancy and follows a chronic course of exacerbations and remissions. The etiology is complex and involves numerous factors that contribute to skin barrier defect and inflammation. In the Middle East, the burden of atopic dermatitis is understudied. Epidemiological data specific to the Gulf region are scarce but reveal a prevalence of up to about 40% in the United Arab Emirates. Region-specific factors, such as the climate and the frequency of consanguineous marriages, may affect atopic dermatitis incidence, prevalence, and evolution over time. A panel of experts predominantly from the United Arab Emirates analyzed the evidence from published guidelines, and considered expert guidance and local treatment practices to develop clear recommendations for the management of atopic dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates. They encourage a systematic approach for the diagnosis and treatment, using disease severity scores and quality-of-life measurement tools. Treatment recommendations take into consideration both established therapies and the approved systemic biologics dupilumab and tralokinumab, and the Janus kinase inhibitors baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor, guselkumab, has demonstrated improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Understanding the relationship among clinical response, PRO measures and baseline characteristics could help clinicians individualize treatment plans. The objective of this analysis was to examine changes in signs, symptoms and quality-of-life (QoL) PRO measures in patients who maintained complete skin clearance through ≥ 3 years in the phase 3 VOYAGE 1 trial. Methods: A descriptive post hoc analysis of data from VOYAGE 1 was conducted to compare baseline characteristics of patients who maintained complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] = 0 for ≥ 156 consecutive weeks) versus patients who did not. Mean scores for individual domains of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) were evaluated in patients who maintained complete skin clearance, and baseline characteristics of patients who achieved PRO scores of DLQI = 0/1 and PSSD = 0 were compared with those who did not. Results: Of the 329 patients included in this post hoc analysis, 73 (22.2%) maintained PASI = 0 for ≥ 156 weeks. This group had a numerically lower proportion of patients at baseline with obesity, depression or previous biologic treatment and a higher proportion who had never smoked. Patients who maintained PASI = 0 generally achieved positive DLQI and PSSD outcomes, though some impact of residual disease was observed, largely related to the DLQI "Symptoms and feelings" sub-scale and PSSD components "Dryness," "Redness" and "Itch." Patients reporting continued disease impact (despite sustaining PASI = 0) had greater disease severity at baseline versus those achieving DLQI = 0/1 and PSSD = 0. Conclusion: Clinical measures alone do not capture the full patient experience. While both QoL and clinical symptoms are responsive to highly effective treatment, a subset of patients with complete clinical response is still impacted by their psoriasis. Further investigation into this population is warranted. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02207231. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients' quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30 mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg for 24 weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up. Results: This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16 weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8–13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0–10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24 weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24 weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab. Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Efficacy of upadacitinib has been assessed in trials including Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg against placebo, while Heads Up assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg in a head-to-head trial against dupilumab 300 mg. A head-to-head trial of upadacitinib 15 mg against dupilumab 300 mg has not been conducted. Network meta-analysis has shown that upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg are among the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies, but prior indirect comparisons have not evaluated more stringent outcomes. Methods: A population-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using post hoc individual patient data from Measure Up 1 and 2 and Heads Up to estimate how upadacitinib 15 mg would have performed if included in Heads Up by adjusting for patient-level covariates. Absolute response rates at weeks 4, 16, and 24 were estimated for the following outcomes: no/minimal itch [Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) score of 0/1], Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≤ 3 (EASI ≤ 3), 100% improvement in EASI (EASI 100), both ≥ 90% improvement in EASI (EASI 90) and WP-NRS 0/1, both EASI ≤ 3 and WP-NRS 0/1, and both EASI 100 and WP-NRS 0/1. The analysis was conducted on adult patients, aligned with the intention-to treat population for the clinical trials, and used non-responder imputation. Results: Across all outcomes assessed, the estimated absolute response rates were greatest for upadacitinib 30 mg, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg and then dupilumab. This pattern was observed at week 4, week 16, and week 24. Conclusions: For adults with moderate-to-severe AD, upadacitinib 30 mg appears to be the most efficacious treatment in attaining more stringent and composite outcomes across multiple timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg and then dupilumab 300 mg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Risankizumab has demonstrated a favourable safety profile in patients with psoriatic disease (moderate-to-severe psoriasis [PsO] and psoriatic arthritis [PsA]). We evaluated the long-term safety of risankizumab in psoriatic disease. Methods: Long-term safety was evaluated by analysing data from 20 (phase 1–4) clinical trials for plaque PsO and four (phase 2–3) trials for PsA. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and AEs in areas of special interest were reported among patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of risankizumab. Exposure-adjusted event rates were presented as events (E) per 100 patient-years (PY). Results: The long-term safety data analyses included 3658 patients with PsO (13,329.3 PY) and 1542 patients with PsA (3803.0 PY). The median (range) treatment duration for patients with PsO and PsA was 4.1 (0.2–8.8) years and 2.8 (0.2–4.0) years, respectively. In the PsO population, rates of TEAEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were 145.5 E/100 PY, 7.4 E/100 PY and 1.9 E/100 PY, respectively; in the PsA population, these rates were 142.6 E/100 PY, 8.6 E/100 PY, and 1.8 E/100 PY, respectively. The rates of serious infections (excluding COVID-19-related infections) in the PsO and PsA populations were 1.2 and 1.4 E/100 PY, respectively. The rates of opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis and herpes zoster) were low (< 0.1 E/100 PY) in both populations. The rates of both nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and malignant tumours excluding NMSC were 0.6 and 0.5 E/100 PY in PsO and PsA, respectively, which are within the benchmarks of prior epidemiological studies. Adjudicated major cardiovascular event rates were 0.5 E/100 PY in PsO and 0.3 E/100 PY in PsA, which are within the epidemiologic reference benchmarks for both indications. No additional safety concerns were identified with this long-term exposure. Conclusions: The results support the favourable safety profile of risankizumab for long-term treatment of psoriatic disease with no new safety concerns and similar safety profiles among both PsO and PsA populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Knowing the remission duration after biologics discontinuation in patients with psoriasis is important, especially when disease relapse is defined as the restart of systemic agents, because it also reflects the real-world clinical practice when topical treatment alone is not adequate for disease control, and a systemic treatment, including biologic, is needed. Biologics are currently indicated for patients with psoriasis who are candidates for systemic treatments. Methods: We included 42 patients who were followed up with regularly after the end of risankizumab, guselkumab and mirikizumab trials and investigated the drug-free remission (DFR). A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model were employed to identify the possible risk factors for relapse. Results: Overall, 38/42 (90.5%) patients experienced relapses after discontinuing trial biologics during the follow-up period of at least 96 weeks and up to 227 weeks. In all patients with relapse, the median DFR was 104 days. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significant 1-year drug-free survival (DFS) difference between risankizumab (Z) and guselkumab (T) + mirikizumab (M) (p = 0.0462). A difference in DFS curves was noted when patients were categorized by disease duration > or ≤ 2 years (p = 0.1577) and maintenance of a psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI) of 90 at the end of trials (p = 0.1177). Univariate Cox regression model identified that age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.030 (1.000–1.060), p = 0.0467] and disease duration [HR = 1.046(1.009–1.084), p = 0.0134] were significantly associated with relapse risk. A risk model was established on the basis of multivariable Cox regression results. Risk value = 0.021038 * Age + 0.515628 * Biologic_type (Z = 0,T/M = 1) + 0.025048 * Disease_Duration. The validated patients were divided into two groups by median risk value (1.5). The high-risk group (risk value > 1.5) had a non-significant higher relapse risk than the low-risk group (risk value < 1.5), with a hazard ratio of 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82–3.23, p = 0.1809]. Conclusion: Types of biologics used, disease duration > or ≤ 2 years, and PASI 90 improvement at the end of trial affect the 1-year DFS after biologics discontinuation. Further studies consisting of a larger patient number and longer follow-up period are needed to verify our findings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02694523, NCT03047395, NCT02207224, NCT02576431, NCT03482011, and NCT03556202. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, a novel, oral, selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority versus placebo and apremilast in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 studies. We describe patient-reported outcomes with deucravacitinib treatment versus placebo and apremilast in these studies. Methods: Two multicenter, global, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled studies randomized patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis 1:2:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily. Score changes from baseline and meaningful within-patient change responses for Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed. Results: In POETYK PSO-1 (n = 666) and PSO-2 (n = 1020), respectively, improvement from baseline in PSSD total score was greater with deucravacitinib (− 27.8 and − 30.1) versus placebo (− 4.4 and − 5.9) and apremilast (− 18.9 and − 22.5) at Week 16 and versus apremilast at Week 24 (deucravacitinib: − 32.8 and − 30.7; apremilast: − 21.6 and − 22.8) (nominal p < 0.0001). Improvement from baseline in DLQI score was also greater with deucravacitinib (− 8.5 and − 7.6) versus placebo (− 3.3 and − 3.0) and apremilast (− 5.9 and − 5.8) at Week 16 and versus apremilast at Week 24 (deucravacitinib: − 8.6 and − 7.5; apremilast: − 5.6 and − 5.5) (nominal p < 0.0001). Achievement of meaningful within-patient change in PSSD total score and in DLQI score occurred more frequently with deucravacitinib than placebo and apremilast at Week 16 and versus apremilast at Week 24. Conclusions: Deucravacitinib demonstrated meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis compared with apremilast and placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03624127, NCT03611751. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology. Methods: A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. Results: Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections. Conclusions: Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 clinical trials. In the study reported here, we aimed to determine the overall 52-week cumulative clinical benefit of treatment initiated with deucravacitinib versus apremilast and to compare the 52-week cumulative benefit of initiating and staying on deucravacitinib versus initiating apremilast and continuing or switching to deucravacitinib at week 24 of treatment. Methods: This post hoc analysis of POETYK PSO-1 data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624127) determined the cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily and apremilast 30 mg twice daily in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients treated with apremilast who did not achieve a 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 24 were switched to deucravacitinib. The cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib versus apremilast over 52 weeks was based on cumulative measures of ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score (PASI 75) and the proportion of patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1). Ratios of area under the curve estimates between treatments were calculated and compared based on analysis of covariance regression models. Results: Patients initiating deucravacitinib (N = 332) had a greater cumulative benefit as measured by the PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast (N = 168). Over 52 weeks, those initiating deucravacitinib experienced 50% more benefit as measured by PASI 75 and 58% more benefit as measured by sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast. Results were consistent with the primary analysis when patients were classified by prior systemic and prior biologic therapy exposure. Conclusion: Results from this analysis corroborate the primary efficacy analysis supporting the use of deucravacitinib compared with apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, regardless of prior systemic or biologic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: An expert panel of Canadian dermatologists was assembled to develop consensus statements regarding the current landscape of topical therapies for plaque psoriasis and the place in therapy of the recently approved fixed-dose combination halobetasol propionate (HP)/tazarotene (TAZ) lotion (HP/TAZ) in the treatment algorithm for plaque psoriasis. Method: A modified nominal group technique, which combined both independent and group input from the expert panel, was used to develop the consensus statements. The expert panel completed surveys to elicit their independent views on the current landscape of topical therapies for plaque psoriasis in Canada. The first expert panel session was held to discuss the existing body of literature and develop draft consensus statements about topical therapies and the place in therapy of HP/TAZ. Independent feedback on the draft consensus statements was solicited from expert panel members prior to another expert panel session where the amended consensus statements were further discussed, edited and, finally, voted on. Results: The expert panel reached consensus on 20 statements. Conclusion: Expert panel members agreed, based on the existing body of literature, that there is a place in therapy for HP/TAZ to address several current unmet treatment needs of patients with plaque psoriasis. Studies have shown that HP/TAZ is an effective and safe first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Due to its cosmetically pleasing vehicle and once-daily administration, HP/TAZ may improve patient acceptance and treatment adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, chronic dermatitis that greatly impacts functioning and quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Approved treatment options for PPP are limited, and many patients do not fully respond to current treatments. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks followed by an extension phase where all patients received apremilast through week 32. PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), modified PPPASI (which evaluates pustules and vesicles separately), and Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) total scores and subscores (erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales) were evaluated over 32 weeks of apremilast treatment. Achievement of ≥ 50% improvement in PPPASI (PPPASI-50) was evaluated at week 16 among baseline demographic and clinical characteristic subgroups. Results: At week 16, improvements in total score and subscores for PPPASI, modified PPASI, and PPSI, as well as rates of PPPASI-50 were at least moderately greater with apremilast than placebo. Mean PPPASI total score decreased by − 68.3% from baseline to week 32 with continued apremilast treatment. At week 32, mean change from baseline in PPPASI/modified PPPASI subscores ranged from − 58.5% to − 77.0% with apremilast. At week 32, PPSI total score for physician and patient assessments decreased by − 51.3% and − 40.0%, respectively, with continued apremilast treatment. PPPASI-50 response at week 16 was greater with apremilast versus placebo in most demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. Conclusions: Improvements in all PPPASI and PPSI total scores and subscores observed with apremilast over 16 weeks were maintained through 32 weeks in patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Rates of PPPASI-50 response at week 16 were mostly consistent across patient subgroups. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04057937. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Early prediction of abrocitinib efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) could help identify candidates for an early dose increase. A predictive model determined week 12 efficacy based on week 4 responses in patients receiving abrocitinib 100 mg/day and assessed the effect of an abrocitinib dose increase on platelet counts. Methods: Analysis included the phase 3 trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), MONO-2 (NCT03575871), COMPARE (NCT03720470), and TEEN (NCT03796676). For platelet counts and simulations, a phase 2 psoriasis trial (NCT02201524) and phase 2b (NCT02780167) and phase 3 (MONO-1, MONO-2, and REGIMEN (NCT03627767)) abrocitinib trials were pooled. A training-and-validation framework assessed potential predictors of response at week 4: score and score change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), and percentage change from baseline in EASI. The dependent variables at week 12 were ≥ 75% improvement in EASI (EASI-75) and IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline. The probability of each variable to predict week 12 EASI-75 and IGA responses was calculated. Results: In the training cohort (n = 453), 72% of the ≥ 50% improvement in EASI (EASI-50) at week 4 responders and 16% of the nonresponders with abrocitinib 100 mg achieved EASI-75 at week 12; 48% and 6% of the week 4 EASI-50 responders and nonresponders, respectively, achieved week 12 IGA response. Similar results occurred with week 4 IGA = 2, ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in PP-NRS, or EASI = 8 responders/nonresponders. Platelet counts after an abrocitinib dose increase from 100 to 200 mg were similar to those seen with continuous dosing with abrocitinib 100 mg or 200 mg. Conclusion: Achieving week 4 clinical responses with abrocitinib 100 mg may be useful in predicting week 12 responses. Week 4 nonresponders may benefit from a dose increase to abrocitinib 200 mg, and those that receive this dose increase are likely to achieve treatment success at week 12, with no significant impact on platelet count recovery. Video abstract available for this article. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03720470, NCT03796676, NCT02201524, NCT02780167 and NCT03627767. Plain Language Summary: Abrocitinib is an approved treatment for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis. Abrocitinib tablets are available in two doses (100 and 200 mg) and are taken by mouth once daily. Some people with atopic dermatitis who are taking abrocitinib 100 mg may need to increase the dose to 200 mg to get adequate symptom relief. We studied whether people with atopic dermatitis who did or did not experience clear skin or itch relief after taking abrocitinib 100 mg for 4 weeks are likely or not likely to experience relief after 12 weeks of treatment. We also defined the level of response after 4 weeks of treatment that best differentiates people who did or did not experience symptom relief, and we identified who might benefit from increasing the abrocitinib dose from 100 to 200 mg. We found that people with atopic dermatitis who had symptom relief after 4 weeks of abrocitinib 100 mg treatment were much more likely to have greater relief after 12 weeks, and people who did not achieve symptom relief after 4 weeks may benefit from a dose increase at week 4. Some people who receive abrocitinib 200 mg may have a temporary decrease in the number of certain blood cells called platelets at week 4, but platelets return to near-normal levels by week 12. This analysis showed that increasing the abrocitinib dose from 100 to 200 mg at week 4 did not seem to affect the platelet numbers after week 4. 5jM1pAZWXrzNQJZKGQNXfy Video abstract (MP4 174529 KB) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. Methods: In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. Results: Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. Conclusions: Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. Trial Registration: NCT03930186. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly heterogeneous chronic inflammatory skin disorder that is frequently associated with a plethora of comorbidities. AD is, therefore, considered a systemic disease impacted by a considerable burden and leading to poor quality of life, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Since atopic and non-atopic comorbidities can further worsen the disease course, accurate establishment of the patient's individual intrinsic risk profile and needs is crucial and may help in guiding the selection of the best treatment option. Better quality of care for patients with AD can be delivered through a multidisciplinary team led by a dermatologist, for comprehensive patient management. The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for AD could enhance the delivery of optimised and safe treatments, improve the standard of care and patient outcomes in the short and long term, and prevent or delay the lifelong impact of uncontrolled AD. Understanding the unmet needs, assessing correctly the patient risk profile and enhancing the shared patient–physician decision-making process can lead to disease control and quality-of-life improvement, especially in the context of the introduction of newer treatment for AD. This narrative review is a call for more data to establish standardised patient profiles and multidisciplinary strategies in AD management. In view on the fast-evolving treatments for AD, this review aims at highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to a comprehensive assessment and holistic care in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology. Methods: A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. Results: Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population. Conclusions: The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Given the chronic nature of psoriasis (PsO), more studies are needed that directly compare the effectiveness of different biologics over long observation periods. This study compares the effectiveness and durability through 12 months of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a real-world setting. Methods: The Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of 1981 adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. The study compares the effectiveness of anti-IL-17A biologics with other approved biologics and provides pairwise comparisons of seven individual biologics versus ixekizumab. The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of patients who had at least a 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI90) and/or a score of 0 or 1 in static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA). Secondary objective comparisons included the proportion of patients who achieved PASI90, PASI100, a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0 or 1, and three different measures of durability of treatment response. Unadjusted response rates are presented alongside the primary analysis, which uses frequentist model averaging (FMA) to evaluate the adjusted comparative effectiveness. Results: Compared to the other biologics cohort, the anti-IL-17A cohort had a higher response rate (68.0% vs. 65.1%) and significantly higher odds of achieving the primary outcome at month 12. The two cohorts had similar response rates for PASI100 (40.5% and 37.1%) and PASI90 (53.9% and 51.7%) at month 12, with no significant differences between the cohorts in the adjusted analyses. At month 12, the response rates across the individual biologics were 53.5–72.6% for the primary outcome, 27.6–48.3% for PASI100, and 41.7–61.4% for PASI90. Conclusions: These results show the comparative effectiveness of biologics at 6 and 12 months in the real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Real-world data on the efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) in clinical moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) are limited. The RAPID study assessed real-world clinical and patient-reported outcomes in RZB-treated PsO patients using data collected from dermatologists in Canada, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, and Poland. Methods: This ongoing, retrospective chart review collected data from medical records of RZB-treated adults with moderate-to-severe PsO (09/2022–06/2023). Eligible patients received RZB, had ≥ 12 months of medical records after RZB initiation (index date), and had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), or static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) scores ≥ 3 months before and up to 18 months after the index date. The proportion of patients achieving a clear/almost clear PsO (IGA/sPGA = 0/1), PASI ≤ 1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) = 0/1, and a 90%/100% improvement from baseline in PASI as well as the mean changes in PASI, DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores at 12 and 18 months were reported for patients with non-missing assessments at baseline and 12 months. Results: Most patients (66.4%) were male, 74.0% were biologic naïve, and 73.0% had scalp PsO. Mean baseline IGA/sPGA was 3.7 ± 0.5, with a mean PASI of 23.3 ± 11.8. After 12 months, 86.1% of patients reported IGA/sPGA ≤ 1, and 75.7% achieved PASI90; these further increased to 91.1% and 80.5% at 18 months. DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores improved over time. Conclusions: These data demonstrated the durable, real-world effectiveness of RZB in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO through continued improvement in disease and symptom severity over 18 months, with most of the patients reporting clear/almost clear skin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects multiple areas of the body, some of which may be more refractory to treatment. We evaluated improvements in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) by body region and clinical signs for each body region in lebrikizumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: ADvocate 1 and ADvocate 2 compared lebrikizumab 250 mg as monotherapy every 2 weeks versus placebo for 16 weeks. Efficacy measures included EASI, which rates the extent and severity of four clinical signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification) in four body regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities). Analyses are post hoc. Results: Mean baseline EASI, body region EASI subscores, and the severity of clinical signs were consistent across both studies (EASI ranging from 16.0 to 72.0). At week 16 in both studies, patients treated with lebrikizumab showed significantly greater percent improvement in EASI across all body regions versus placebo (p ≤ 0.001), with improvements as early as week 2. In ADvocate 1, all clinical signs significantly improved across all body regions at week 16 with lebrikizumab (51.4–71.6% improvement) versus placebo (23.1–43.5%, p ≤ 0.001), with significant improvements as early as week 2 for all signs. Significant improvements for all clinical signs at week 16 were also seen in ADvocate 2 for lebrikizumab (53.5–75.6%) versus placebo (28.5–41.2%, p ≤ 0.001) and as early as week 2 for all body regions and signs except head/neck erythema and lower extremity erythema, edema/papulation, and lichenification, which showed significant improvement by week 4. Conclusions: Lebrikizumab as monotherapy consistently and rapidly reduced the extent of involvement and severity of AD in all EASI clinical signs and body regions, including the head and neck region and clinical sign of lichenification, compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ADvocate 1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate 2 (NCT04178967). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by intense itch and other symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QoL). This study evaluates the effect of upadacitinib (an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor) monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD over 16 weeks. Methods: This integrated analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled periods of phase 3 monotherapy clinical trials Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422) assessed itch (Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [WP-NRS] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), skin pain and symptom severity (AD Symptom Scale), symptom frequency (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure), sleep (AD Impact Scale [ADerm-IS] and SCORAD), daily activities and emotional state (ADerm-IS), QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Children's DLQI), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and patient impressions (Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment). Results: Data from 1683 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, n = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, n = 567; placebo, n = 559) were analyzed. A greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo experienced improvements in itch (≥ 4-point improvement on WP-NRS) by week 1 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 11.2%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 17.7%; placebo, 0.5%; P < 0.001), with response rates sustained through week 16 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 47.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 59.8%; placebo, 10.4%; P < 0.001). Improvements were similar for PROs assessing skin pain/symptoms, sleep, daily activities, QoL, emotional state, mental health, and patient impressions of disease severity and treatment. Responses generally improved rapidly (within 1–2 weeks), increased through weeks 4–6, and were maintained through week 16. Conclusions: Once-daily oral upadacitinib monotherapy improved response rates across PROs compared with placebo. Upadacitinib therapy resulted in rapid, sustained improvements in PROs measuring symptom burden and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03569293 and NCT03607422. Plain Language Summary: Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is characterized by itchy, dry, inflamed skin. These symptoms often make it difficult for patients to get adequate sleep. Patients with atopic dermatitis may also experience anxiety, depression, reduced self-confidence, social isolation, disruption to daily activities like school and work, and decreased quality of life. Many atopic dermatitis symptoms, including itch and psychological impact, are difficult for doctors to assess. Thus, it is important to consider patients' descriptions of their symptoms and quality of life, particularly when assessing treatment benefit. Upadacitinib is an orally administered drug approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We investigated how upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) given once daily to adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in the Measure Up 1 and 2 clinical trials impacts their symptoms and quality of life over a 16-week period. We compared changes in patient-reported itch, pain, sleep, daily activities, emotional state, mental health, and overall quality of life among patients in the clinical trials who received upadacitinib with those in the same studies who received a dummy (placebo) treatment. Upadacitinib improved patient-reported symptoms and quality of life early in the clinical trials, often within the first 1–2 weeks. The extent of the improvements increased through weeks 4–6 of treatment and lasted through week 16. Patients who received upadacitinib reported greater improvements in symptoms and quality of life than did patients who received placebo. Upadacitinib treatment resulted in rapid and lasting improvements in the well-being of patients with atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis is associated with intense itch, which has been shown to cause sleep disruption that significantly impacts the lives of patients with atopic dermatitis. Despite this, little is known about its burden to the healthcare system and society. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of itch-related sleep loss in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in the UK. Methods: A literature-based decision-analytic model was developed from a healthcare payer and societal perspective. The model quantifies the economic burden by linking the severity of itch to the number of days of sleep disruption. The model captures the direct costs of healthcare resource utilization and treatment alongside the indirect costs of productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism at work over a 5-year time horizon. The patient population considered was patients aged ≥ 15 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and itch-related sleep disruption. Results: The model estimated that itch-related sleep disruption as a result of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis would affect an average of 821,142 people over the time horizon (2022 to 2026). This translates into an average net economic burden of £3.8 billion (£4687 per patient), with an average of 172 million days being affected by sleep disruption per year in the UK. The greatest contributor to the annual average net economic burden was productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism, each accounting for 34%. The direct costs (treatment costs and healthcare resource use) accounted for 32% of the net economic burden. The results showed a high and gradually increasing economic burden over the 5-year time horizon. Conclusions: Sleep disruption has a high economic burden and reducing itch may provide substantial direct and indirect savings. Quantifying the economic burden of itch-related sleep loss may provide support for analyses to inform public health policies for treatment of atopic dermatitis, particularly within the moderate-to-severe level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The experience of itch often poses a burden on patient quality of life and has the capacity to inflict significant suffering. Topical therapies are a mainstay of treatment for many cutaneous and systemic diseases and afford patients the opportunity to manage their conditions without many of the systemic side effects of non-topical therapies. We review a multitude of new topical medications targeting the skin, immune system, and neural receptors. The list includes Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, transient receptor vanilloid inhibitors, topical cannabinoids, and topical acetaminophen. Many of the topical therapies reviewed show promising data in phase 2–3 clinical trials, but further research is needed to compare therapies head-to-head and test their efficacy on a broader range of conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tralokinumab and dupilumab are biological agents licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adult patients who are candidates for systemic treatment. However, no head-to-head studies of their efficacy have been conducted. This study indirectly compared the efficacy of tralokinumab and dupilumab, both in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS), at week 32. Methods: An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using individual patient data (IPD) from the ECZTRA 3 tralokinumab trial and aggregate data from the LIBERTY AD CHRONOS dupilumab trial. IPD were selected by applying inclusion criteria from LIBERTY AD CHRONOS and weighting to match summary baseline characteristics—age, sex, race, body mass index, disease duration, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index—of patients treated with dupilumab. Week 32 outcomes of interest were 50%, 75% or 90% improvements in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90), IGA scores of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1), ≥ 4-point improvement in worst daily pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and mean improvements in DLQI and the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Results: After matching, tralokinumab and dupilumab, both in combination with TCS, showed similar efficacy across clinical response endpoints at week 32 (IGA 0/1, tralokinumab 49.9% vs dupilumab 39.3%; EASI-50, 78.9% vs 77.5%; EASI-75, 71.5% vs 71.9%; EASI-90, 53.3% vs 56.2%). The mean change from baseline in DLQI was statistically significantly larger in the matched tralokinumab plus TCS population than in the dupilumab plus TCS arm (− 12.1 vs − 10.4, p = 0.005). Changes in POEM and worst daily pruritus NRS were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this analysis demonstrate that, in combination with TCS, tralokinumab and dupilumab have similar efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD at 32 weeks of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends evaluating patient response to treatment at week 12, with a target response of ≤ 1% body surface area (BSA) affected by plaque psoriasis and an acceptable response of BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement. This post hoc analysis compared the achievement of NPF target and acceptable responses for ixekizumab (IXE) versus other biologics. Methods: Outcomes were evaluated at week 12 for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from four head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs; UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) and one real-world prospective observational study (Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes; PSoHO). RCT patients were treated with IXE or etanercept (ETN; UNCOVER-2/3), guselkumab (GUS; IXORA-R), or ustekinumab (UST; IXORA-S). PSoHO patients were treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (IXE, secukinumab, SEC) and other approved biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients with missing outcomes were imputed as non-responder imputation. For RCT data, statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using Fisher's exact test with no multiplicity adjustments. For real-world data, adjusted comparative analyses were performed using frequentist model averaging (FMA) and reported as odds ratio (OR). Results: Across the four head-to-head clinical trials analyzed, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved target and acceptable responses at week 12 with IXE versus ETN, GUS, or UST. Likewise, the proportion of PSoHO patients achieving target and acceptable response at week 12 was higher with IXE compared with other individual biologics. Adjusted comparative analyses showed that IXE had significantly greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus SEC, GUS, risankizumab (RIS), adalimumab (ADA), UST, and tildrakizumab (TILD) and numerically greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus brodalumab (BROD). Conclusion: Across both clinical studies and real-world settings, more patients treated with IXE achieved NPF target and acceptable responses at week 12 compared with those treated with other biologics. Trial Registration: UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177); IXORA-R (NCT03573323); IXORA-S (NCT02561806); PSoHO (EUPAS24207). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is now considered a systemic disease, and several comorbidities have been described such as cardiovascular diseases, neurologic and psychiatric disorders, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis, etc. Regarding cardiovascular comorbidities, major adverse cardiovascular events have been reported in psoriasis patients by multiple epidemiologic studies. Moreover, smoking, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and reduced physical activity are associated with psoriasis, increasing cardiovascular risk. Consequently, several aspects should be considered when making the treatment decision. The aim of this review manuscript was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs acting on molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis in preventing cardiovascular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune skin disease presenting as nonscarring hair loss. Information on the epidemiology of AA, especially the occurrence of AA and its subtypes within the general population, is scarce. The study aimed to estimate the incidence rates and prevalence of hospital-treated AA and its subtypes in Denmark and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with AA, including comorbidities and use of prescription medications. Methods: This was a cohort study based on data from administrative and health registers in Denmark in 1995–2016. The study included individuals who were (1) registered with a hospital inpatient or hospital-based outpatient clinic diagnosis of AA between 1995 and 2016 in the Danish National Patient Registry covering encounters at all Danish hospitals, (2) alive and resided in Denmark anytime between 1995 and 2016, (3) aged ≥ 12 years, and (4) resided uninterrupted in Denmark during the 12 months before the first AA diagnosis during the study period. Results: During the study period, 2778 individuals with an incident hospital-based diagnosis of AA were identified; 63.1% were female and 28.7% of the patients were aged ≥ 50 years. Over the study period, the overall incidence rate for any hospital-treated AA per 100,000 person-years was 2.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53–2.72), and the overall prevalence in 2016 was 71.7 (95% CI 69.4–74.1) per 100,000 persons. Both incidence rate and prevalence increased over time. Prevalence of most hospital-treated comorbidities or history of medication use was below 10% and was similar in the alopecia totalis (AT)/alopecia universalis (AU) and non-AT/AU subtypes of AA. Conclusion: This cohort study reported incidence rates and prevalence over time and characteristics of individuals with hospital-treated AA in Denmark, which are in agreement with those previously reported in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare, and potentially life-threatening disease. There is limited understanding of patient characteristics in GPP and their correlation with disease progression or healthcare resource utilization. Our review aims to examine real-world evidence on these characteristics and the associated disease burden as related to economic and quality of life factors. Results showed that most patients with GPP experienced flares once a year, lasting from 2 weeks to 3 months, with > 80% of patients having residual disease post-flare, with/without treatment, indicating the long-term nature of GPP. The impact of GPP on patients' daily activities was significant, even in the absence of a flare. GPP adversely affected mental health, and anxiety and depression were reported regularly. Patients with GPP had more comorbidities, were prescribed more medication, and had more inpatient and outpatient visits than in matched plaque psoriasis or general population cohorts. Improving the education of healthcare providers in diagnosing GPP, defining disease flares, and managing the disease, as well as making globally accepted clinical guidelines for GPP treatment available, could help to reduce the burden on patients with GPP. Effective therapies that control and prevent GPP flares and manage chronic disease are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a growing awareness among dermatology providers of ocular comorbidities in patients with the chronic inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis (AD). For example, the prevalence of ocular surface diseases (OSD) such as conjunctivitis is higher in patients with AD than in the general population, and the use of some AD treatments may be associated with OSD. In a recent review published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, dermatologists and ophthalmologists provided an overview of the different types, etiology, pathophysiology, and practical management of OSD associated with AD. This review included a suggested treatment algorithm that champions a partnership between dermatology providers and eye care providers for optimal screening, diagnosis, and care. In this podcast article, a dermatologist and ophthalmologist who were authors on this review are joined by a nurse practitioner moderator to discuss how these concepts can be adapted to clinical practice, inclusive of dermatologists, eye care providers, and relevant advanced practice providers. This podcast focuses on the authors' clinical experiences and highlights the key aspects of optimal care, including exploring additional questions to answer with future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory disease characterized by both fluctuating and fixed heterogeneous signs such as facial erythema, papules/pustules, telangiectasia, acute vasodilation (flushing), and phymatous changes, and symptoms such as cutaneous stinging and burning. The shift to a phenotype-based approach to rosacea management has improved the consistency of recommendations across recent published guidelines. Consistent and thorough guidance for the classification, diagnosis, and management of the disease is difficult, as the mechanisms underlying the development of rosacea are still not completely understood nor universally accepted. Here, we provide a critical review of current published guidance, and gaps in the knowledge and management of rosacea. We present the recently approved microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide as an effective topical treatment option for papulopustular rosacea. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used in acne management for many years; however, many clinicians perceive treatment of rosacea with any BPO formulation to be counterintuitive because of concerns of potential skin irritation, while the lack of an accepted mechanism of action on rosacea pathophysiology means that others may be hesitant to use BPO as a treatment. Minocycline foam 1.5% is also an option for the treatment of inflammatory lesions in rosacea, with a decreased risk of systemic adverse events compared with oral minocycline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lebrikizumab and dupilumab are monoclonal antibodies approved for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Both have demonstrated efficacy and safety over the 16-week SOLOs and ADvocate trials. However, AD is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disease, and the long-term maintenance of efficacy is critical for achieving disease control from the perspective of patients, physicians, and regulatory agencies. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) and dupilumab every week or every 2 weeks (QW/Q2W) among adult patients who have achieved treatment efficacy following the induction period of 16 weeks. Methods: Lebrikizumab's efficacy was assessed using individual patient data (IPD) from the ADvocate 1 and 2 monotherapy trials. Dupilumab's efficacy was evaluated using aggregate data from the adult-exclusive SOLO-CONTINUE trial. Due to the absence of a common comparator trial arm, we employed an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), a robust methodology widely accepted by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. This re-weights ADvocate IPD to align with SOLO-CONTINUE's prognostic factors and effect modifiers. We compared lebrikizumab's adjusted outcomes with dupilumab outcomes at week 52, focusing on 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index from baseline (EASI-75), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1, and overall adverse event (AE) rates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test various combinations of matching variables. Results: Adults on lebrikizumab Q4W were more likely to maintain IGA 0/1 through the 36-week maintenance period (weeks 16–52) compared with those on dupilumab QW/Q2W [risk ratio (RR) 1.334; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.74; p = 0.035]. Both treatments demonstrated comparable efficacy in terms of EASI-75 maintenance (RR 0.937; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p = 0.490) and similar AE rates (RR 1.052; 95% CI 0.90–1.23; p = 0.526). Sensitivity analyses substantiated these findings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lebrikizumab Q4W may provide equal or superior long-term maintenance of efficacy measured with EASI-75 and IGA 0/1 compared with dupilumab QW/Q2W, with the advantage of requiring less frequent doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is a scarcity of data beyond 1 year for the use of dupilumab to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) in a real-world setting. This study aimed to evaluate the 2-year effectiveness of dupilumab among adult and pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD included in a real-world, longitudinal database study. Methods: PROSE is an ongoing, prospective, observational, multi-center registry in the USA and Canada, designed to collect real-world data from patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD who initiate dupilumab in accordance with country-specific prescribing information. Assessments include body surface area affected by AD (BSA), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Patient Global Assessment of Disease (PGAD) questionnaire score, and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 764 patients who enrolled in PROSE, 632 (83%) remained in the study at the time of this interim analysis. Improvements were observed at the first post-baseline clinic visit (approximately 3 months) in the clinician-assessed measures (mean BSA and EASI scores); improvements were sustained throughout the 2-year period covered in the present study. Consistent and sustained improvements were also observed over the 2-year period in the patient-reported measures of P-NRS, POEM, and DLQI, and in the proportion of patients reporting "very good/excellent" in answer to the question in the PGAD questionnaire: "Considering all the ways in which your eczema affects you, indicate how well you are doing". Dupilumab treatment was well tolerated, with safety findings consistent with those previously reported in studies of dupilumab for the treatment of AD. Conclusions: In the real-world PROSE registry, patients with moderate-to-severe AD experienced sustained improvement in disease control, symptoms, and quality of life up to 2 years after initiating dupilumab treatment. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 03428646. 5v18Ci3NqU6719FdQ_Njj3 Video abstract (MP4 20,717 kb) Plain Language Summary: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term disease that affects the skin of patients, causing rash, inflammation, and intense itching, all leading to profound negative effects on their quality of life. In short-term studies, dupilumab has been shown to improve the signs and symptoms of AD, and to improve patients' quality of life. However, there is currently little information about the effectiveness of dupilumab when patients use it over the long term in the real world. This study used data from the ongoing PROSE registry, which is collecting information on 764 adults and adolescents (aged ≥ 12 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who are using dupilumab in the real world; patients were allowed to use other AD treatments and could even stop using dupilumab. Most patients (83%) were evaluated after 2 years of treatment. The study looked at how physicians judged changes over time in the severity of patients' AD. Importantly, it also used measures to allow patients themselves to report how they felt treatment affected their AD, the amount of itch they experienced, and their quality of life. Improvements in the severity of AD were already seen at 3 months, and they were maintained over the 2-year period. Patients also reported consistent and sustained improvements in their AD symptoms and quality of life during the 2 years of treatment. This analysis shows that patients with AD who began dupilumab treatment can have sustained long-term improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For decades, topical corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment for mild-to-moderate inflammatory skin diseases, even though only short-term use is approved for these agents and systemic inflammation is not addressed. Increased understanding of the immunopathogenesis of these conditions, especially for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, has facilitated the development of antibody-based drugs that neutralize single key cytokines or their associated receptors, such as interleukin (IL)-17A/F, IL-23, and IL-17RA in psoriasis and IL-13 and IL-4Rα in atopic dermatitis. However, oral therapy is still preferred by many patients owing to the ease of use and needle-free administration. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been approved for both oral and topical use for inflammatory skin diseases. In this review, we present a summary of an emerging class of selective PDE4B/D inhibitors under clinical development and compare the differences in selectivity of this new generation of PDE4 inhibitors with the less selective currently approved PDE4 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on clinical trials of systemic treatments in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) reported between 2014 and 2023, we used linear regression to investigate relationships between baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and (1) study start date, (2) EASI response, and (3) rescue medication rates. Analysis 1 was conducted with all patients from monotherapy and combination therapy trials; analyses 2 and 3 used monotherapy trial placebo arms. Across 32 trials with a baseline inclusion criterion of EASI ≥ 16, baseline mean EASI scores decreased with study start date. The lowest and highest baseline mean EASI scores were 25.1 and 33.6 (median 21.1 and 30.5), reported for the WW001 Phase 2 trial of rademikibart (formerly CBP-201; start date, July 2020) and the SOLO1 Phase 3 trial of dupilumab (start date, December 2014), respectively. In placebo arms, lower baseline EASI scores tended to be associated with greater percent reductions in EASI scores at Week 16 and less rescue medication usage. The WW001 trial placebo arm had the lowest baseline EASI score (mean 25.2; median 22.1), lowest rescue medication rate (14.3%), and a large reduction in least squares mean EASI scores (− 39.7%) at Week 16. In summary, baseline mean EASI scores have decreased across clinical trials conducted during the last decade. Less severe AD at baseline tended to be associated with greater placebo response and less use of rescue medications in placebo arms. Intertrial differences in variables, such as baseline AD severity, limit the validity of indirectly comparing clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, blocks cytokine signaling involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. This ethnic-bridging study evaluated deucravacitinib pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: This phase I, double-blind, single-/multiple-dose study randomized healthy Chinese subjects 4:1 to a single dose of deucravacitinib 6 mg or placebo (group 1) or deucravacitinib 12 mg or placebo (group 2) on day 1; groups 1 and 2 received deucravacitinib 6 mg and 12 mg once daily, respectively, or placebo on days 5–19. Blood samples were collected on days 1–5 (0 predose–96 h postdose), day 5 (0–24 h postdose), days 9 and 12 (0 h), and day 19 (0–24 h postdose). Deucravacitinib and metabolite (BMT-153261, BMT-158170) concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry; pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Urine was collected on days 1–4 (4 h predose–96 h postdose). Safety was monitored throughout. Results: Forty healthy Chinese subjects (groups 1 and 2: deucravacitinib, n = 32; placebo, n = 8) were enrolled. Deucravacitinib was rapidly absorbed after single-/multiple-dose administration, with median time to maximal plasma concentration of 1.5–2.3 h. Systemic exposure after single or multiple doses increased approximately twofold with twofold dose increase. Modest deucravacitinib accumulation was observed after multiple-dose administration (1.3- to 1.4-fold increase in area under the curve [AUC] under one dosing interval). Metabolite-to-parent ratios for maximal plasma concentration and AUC remained consistent in each dose group. Mean urinary percent recovery and renal clearance were similar between dose groups. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild/moderate, with no serious treatment-related AEs, deaths, or discontinuations due to AEs. Conclusion: Deucravacitinib was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Deucravacitinib exhibited rapid absorption, dose-related increases in exposure, comparable half-life, and no evidence of time-dependent pharmacokinetics, suggesting minimal effect of Chinese ethnicity on deucravacitinib pharmacokinetics. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03956953. Plain Language Summary: Deucravacitinib, a new oral medication, blocks an enzyme called tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), which is activated in plaque psoriasis. This reduces thick, scaly patches of skin, itching, and other symptoms. How a drug is absorbed and its effects can vary between patients of different races and ethnicities. We studied the safety of deucravacitinib in healthy Chinese volunteers. We also studied how bigger or smaller doses of deucravacitinib change how much of it is absorbed into the blood. We found that most side effects of deucravacitinib were mild or moderate compared to volunteers taking placebo, a look-alike pill that contains no drug. The most common side effects were skin rashes and headaches. No serious side effects were related to deucravacitinib. Deucravacitinib was quickly absorbed into the blood. The time it took for deucravacitinib to reach its maximum amount in the blood was similar regardless of how large of a dose was initially taken. Increasing the amount of deucravacitinib taken also increased the total amount of deucravacitinib absorbed, both in terms of the total amount absorbed and the maximum amount in blood at one time. These results in healthy Chinese volunteers were similar to the results of other studies in a general population of many races and ethnicities. Deucravacitinib works the same in Chinese patients as in patients of other ethnicities. Chinese patients will not need to adjust their dose when taking deucravacitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, is approved in the United States to treat adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO). This study compared the long-term efficacy of deucravacitinib and adalimumab using results from long-term extension (LTE) trials. Methods: Open-label LTE trials were identified for an indirect treatment comparison (deucravacitinib: POETYK PSO-LTE [NCT04036435]; adalimumab: REVEAL extension [NCT00195676]). To ensure study design comparability, patients initially randomized to placebo and switched to deucravacitinib or adalimumab after week 16 were compared. The primary outcome was an ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 112 postrandomization. Secondary outcomes were PASI 75 at week 52 and an ≥ 90% reduction in PASI score (PASI 90) at weeks 52 and 112. Missing PASI data were imputed. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted; individual patient-level data from POETYK PSO-LTE were reweighted to balance baseline characteristics with those from the REVEAL extension. Results: Before reweighting, on average, patients in the POETYK PSO-LTE (N = 329) versus the REVEAL (N = 345) extension were older, had a lower body weight, received more prior systemic treatments, and had higher baseline PASI scores and week 16 placebo PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates. Following reweighting, adjusted week 112 PASI 75 response rates were significantly higher for deucravacitinib versus adalimumab (67.2% vs. 54.0%; mean difference [95% CI], 13.2 [4.0–22.5] percentage points). Deucravacitinib had a numerically higher adjusted week 112 PASI 90 response rate (41.3% vs. 34.0%; mean difference [95% CI], 7.3 [−2.0 to 16.7] percentage points). The treatments had similar week 52 adjusted PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates. Conclusion: In this interim analysis, adults with moderate to severe PsO had higher long-term response rates at 2 years when treated with deucravacitinib versus adalimumab. Deucravacitinib response rates remained stable whereas adalimumab response rates declined in year 2. Plain Language Summary: Plaque psoriasis is an inflammatory disease that causes red, itchy, dry patches (called plaques) on the skin. The disease cannot be cured, but the symptoms can be treated. Deucravacitinib and adalimumab are two treatments approved for use in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis; deucravacitinib is an oral medication and adalimumab is injected with a needle under the skin. Each treatment has proven its efficacy compared with placebo (a pill or injection with no active effect) in separate clinical trials, but because no two clinical trials are exactly alike, the results cannot be accurately compared. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison is a method used to compare the results of one clinical trial with those of another when a direct comparison is not possible; characteristics from the patients in one trial are made to match the patient population in the other trial, and the adjusted results are compared. We performed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of an open-label extension trial of deucravacitinib with an open-label extension trial of adalimumab to study the long-term efficacy of each treatment. At 1 year of treatment, we observed that similar proportions of patients receiving each treatment achieved a 75% or 90% improvement from their baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, called PASI 75 or PASI 90, respectively. At 2 years of treatment, similar proportions achieved PASI 90, but the proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib who achieved PASI 75 was greater than that of patients receiving adalimumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, a newly approved oral medication for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, demonstrated efficacy versus apremilast and placebo in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) indirectly compared deucravacitinib with other relevant systemic biologic/nonbiologic treatments. Methods: Online databases were searched for RCTs published through October 2021. Eligible studies were head-to-head comparisons between systemic therapies and/or placebo reporting 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Comparisons included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, and IL 12/23 inhibitors, and systemic nonbiologics. A multinomial Bayesian NMA was used to derive estimates of the relative efficacy of deucravacitinib and other systemic therapies. Response probabilities for each treatment and corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for achieving a PASI response were calculated over short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up (weeks 10–16, 24–28, and 44–60). Results: The NMA included 47 RCTs. Deucravacitinib showed the highest PASI 75 response rates among nonbiologic systemic therapies across time points. Deucravacitinib PASI 75 response rate (95% CrI) over short-term follow-up was 54.1% (46.5–61.6), within the range of first-generation biologics (etanercept, 39.7% [31.6–48.3]; infliximab, 79.0% [74.0–83.5]). At mid-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 increased to 63.3% (58.0–68.4). At long-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 was 65.9% (58.0–73.4), comparable to first-generation biologics adalimumab (62.8%; 55.3–69.6) and ustekinumab (68.0%; 64.6–71.5). Conclusions: Patients receiving deucravacitinib were more likely to achieve PASI 75 response versus apremilast and methotrexate across all time points. The long-term PASI 75 response rate for deucravacitinib was similar to those of adalimumab and ustekinumab. The approval of deucravacitinib offers patients the choice of an oral therapy with long-term efficacy similar to that of some biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For children aged 6–11 years with uncontrolled severe atopic dermatitis (AD), 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab resulted in substantial clinical benefit compared with placebo with an acceptable safety profile. However, longer-term safety and efficacy data are important to inform longitudinal AD management. Objectives: This analysis of data from an open-label extension study (LIBERTY AD PED-OLE, NCT02612454) reports the long-term safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of dupilumab in children with severe AD who had participated in the pivotal dupilumab LIBERTY AD PEDS study (NCT03345914). Methods: Enrolled patients initially received subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). The q4w regimen could be uptitrated to dupilumab dose regimens of 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w; for body weight < 60 or ≥ 60 kg, respectively) for patients who did not achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear skin) at week 16, or prior to week 16 as rescue treatment. Additional patients were uptitrated to a weight-tiered q2w regimen following a protocol amendment. Patients who maintained an IGA score of 0/1 continuously for a 12-week period after week 40 discontinued dupilumab. They were monitored for relapse and were reinitiated on dupilumab if required. Results: Data for 321 patients (mean age 8.6 years) were analyzed, 254 (79%) of whom had completed the scheduled 52-week visit at the database lock. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate. By week 52, 41% of patients achieved an IGA score of 0/1, and 97%, 82%, and 50%, respectively, had at least a 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement from the parent study baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). By week 52, 29% of patients in the overall population had clear/almost clear skin sustained for 12 weeks and had stopped medication; of these, 40% relapsed and were subsequently reinitiated on treatment, with a mean time to reinitiation of 13.5 (standard deviation 5.2) weeks. Following reinitiation of dupilumab, 41% of the patients with evaluable data at the time of database lock had regained an IGA 0/1 clinical response. Conclusions: Consistent with results seen in adults and adolescents, long-term treatment with dupilumab in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD showed an acceptable safety profile and incremental clinical benefit. A substantial proportion of children who stopped dupilumab treatment after achieving clear/almost clear skin subsequently experienced disease recurrence, and required reinitiation of dupilumab, suggesting that continuous treatment may be necessary for maintenance of clinical benefit. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02612454. Plain Language Summary: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic disease that causes recurrent inflamed and rough skin rashes with itching and often soreness. In children with AD, treatment with a medication called dupilumab has shown improvements in their disease and quality of life. But most clinical trials of dupilumab in children have only lasted for 16 weeks. We investigated the effect of dupilumab in children treated for a longer time. The 321 children (aged 6–11 years) who were included in this study had taken part in a clinical trial of dupilumab because they had severe AD. They were treated with either dupilumab or a placebo (a dummy treatment) for 16 weeks. When that trial ended, they were then all treated with dupilumab for up to a year. Their average AD severity continued to get steadily better over a year of extended treatment, with almost all children reaching 50% skin improvement compared with their AD before treatment. Many children reached a point where their skin was clear or almost clear of AD for a period, and following the rules of the study they stopped taking dupilumab. In many of them, their AD slowly returned without treatment. But if they started to take dupilumab again, their AD improved, and some could even achieve skin clearance again. Over the longer term, the safety of dupilumab was similar to what was seen with short-term treatment. This study showed that children with AD aged 6–11 years benefited from receiving dupilumab for a longer period of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Near-complete skin clearance has become a rapidly achievable treatment goal for patients with psoriasis receiving systemic biologic therapies. However, real-world evidence for durability of near-complete skin clearance and risk factors associated with loss of near-complete skin clearance is limited. Methods: This study described durability of near-complete skin clearance (≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from initiation; PASI90) and identified clinical factors or patient characteristics associated with loss of PASI90 among patients with psoriasis from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (April 2015–August 2021). Included patients had PASI > 5 at biologic initiation and achieved PASI90 at approximately 6 months from initiation (index). A Kaplan-Meier estimate described time to loss of treatment response over 24 months follow-up from index. Proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of loss of treatment response. Results: This study included 687 patient initiations (instances of patients initiating a biologic). Following achievement of PASI90, treatment response was maintained in more than half of patient initiations (54%). Treatment response was maintained at 6, 12, and 18 months from index in an estimated 73% (95% [confidence interval] CI 70–77%), 60% (95% CI 56–63%), and 50% (95% CI 47–54%) of patient initiations, respectively. Adjusted hazards regression suggested non-White race, full-time employment, greater body weight, concomitant psoriatic arthritis, prior use of biologics, and clinically meaningful skin symptoms were associated with loss of treatment response. Conclusions: Among real-world patients with psoriasis who achieved PASI90 with biologic therapy, about one-quarter lost response at 6 months, and half lost response at 18 months. Prior use of a biologic therapy and clinically meaningful skin symptoms at index, including itch and skin pain, were associated with loss of treatment response. Therefore, dermatologists may consider focusing on patient-reported symptoms as part of any intervention designed to reduce the likelihood of loss of response to biologic therapies. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02707341. Plain Language Summary: Many people with psoriasis are treated with biologic medications that work to improve symptoms associated with psoriasis, including inflammation. These medications can lead to almost clear skin for many people. However, there is limited information available about how long almost clear skin can be maintained with biologic medications, and what predicts who is likely to lose it. To explore these questions, we examined a database of patients with psoriasis (the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry) that records how clear patients' skin is and the medications they take. Out of every 100 patients, 54 maintained almost clear skin and stayed on their original medication for 2 years after first having almost clear skin. Out of every 100 patients, 73, 60, and 50 maintained almost clear skin and remained on their original medication at 6, 12, and 18 months after they had achieved this response. The results indicated that patients who were not White, worked full time, previously used a biologic medication, or had itchy and/or painful skin after they had achieved almost-clear skin were more likely to change their medication and/or no longer have almost-clear skin. These results suggest that dermatologists may consider focusing on patient-reported characteristics when deciding how to treat their patients, to reduce the likelihood that they lose their response to the medication they are prescribed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disease that affects men and women of all ages, including children. PRP is characterized by follicular and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and salmon-colored scaling plaques. The exact pathogenesis of PRP is still unknown; most PRP cases are acquired, but some cases may show a familial occurrence, often associated with a mutation in the CARD14 gene. Due to the rarity of PRP, treatment recommendations are based mainly on case reports, small case series and expert opinions and still represent a major therapeutic challenge, especially in children. A growing number of reports on treatment with biologicals, particularly anti-TNFα, has been published. However, an involvement of the IL-23/Th17 axis in both psoriasis and PRP pathogenesis may suggest that this pathway may be a potential therapeutic target. Here, we present three pediatric patients with PRP successfully treated with risankizumab. All patients exhibited a severe course of PRP and lack of response to conventional therapy, including acitretin, cyclosporine and phototherapy. A single dose of 75 mg risankizumab resulted in almost complete clearance of skin lesions in case 1 and 2 at week 4. In patient 3, clear skin was achieved after the second administration of risankizumab (150 mg). All patients continue the treatment with risankizumab, and no adverse effects have been reported up to the present time. Our study demonstrates that risankizumab, an IL-23 blocker, shows good efficacy and safety among pediatric patients with PRP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The treatment landscape for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) continues to expand. This network meta-analysis (NMA) updates a previously conducted NMA to include data from the most recent phase 3 trials to assess the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: Data from recent phase 3 monotherapy trials of lebrikizumab, ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967), were included in the analyses, along with other eligible phase 3/4 randomized placebo-controlled trials for abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib identified through a systemic literature review in Silverberg et al. (Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 12(5):1181–1196, 2022). The proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement ≥ 90% from baseline (EASI-90), EASI improvement ≥ 75% from baseline (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥ 4), and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline (IGA 0/1) were evaluated using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results: The updated NMA analyzed 13 unique placebo-controlled trials involving 7105 patients in 32 arms across 6 targeted therapies. Upadacitinib 30 mg was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary timepoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, generally followed by abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg or abrocitinib 100 mg. Baricitinib 2 mg and tralokinumab were generally ranked lower across outcomes. Conclusions: Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD, especially as new treatments continue to emerge. After incorporating recent placebo-controlled phase 3 data of lebrikizumab, upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, and abrocitinib 200 mg remain the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12–16 weeks of therapy in AD. These updated findings can help healthcare providers when creating a patient's personalized treatment plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Apremilast, the first oral targeted treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis, is associated with diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, which have contributed to treatment discontinuation. This study describes early apremilast discontinuation rates in patients with psoriasis, including a cohort with gastrointestinal (GI) comorbidities, and associated characteristics. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used IBM® (now Merative™) MarketScan® commercial and Medicare claims data to identify adults with psoriasis who filled their first apremilast prescription between September 1, 2014 and March 31, 2020. Discontinuation was defined as a gap of > 30 days after exhausting the days' supply of a prescription fill. The GI comorbidity cohort included patients with ≥ 1 claim for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or other GI comorbidity during the study period. Results: Discontinuation rates were high, regardless of previous biologic treatment or GI comorbidities. Among all patients, 25.5% discontinued within 60 days and 56.4% discontinued within 180 days. Patients who discontinued were more likely to be younger, female, and have IBD, Crohn's disease, or a mental health disorder. At 180 days, patients who used biologics previously were more likely to discontinue than biologic-naive patients. Patients with IBD discontinued at a greater rate than those without IBD at 60 days (30.3% vs 24.4%; P = 0.018) and 180 days (63.6% vs 57.2%; P = 0.026). Differences in discontinuation rates were minimal between GI comorbidity groups; patients with IBS discontinued at numerically higher rates than those without IBS. Conclusions: High rates of early discontinuation were observed for patients with and without GI comorbidities. Early discontinuation, whether attributable to poor tolerability or effectiveness, suggests the need for additional oral treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]