Search

Introduction: Dupilumab has significantly improved the signs, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in randomised, controlled clinical trials. However, there is a need to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in real-world clinical practice. The PROLEAD study was designed to examine the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in moderate-to-severe AD in a real-world setting in Germany. Here, we present 12-week effectiveness and safety results with dupilumab from PROLEAD. Methods: PROLEAD is a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study being conducted at 126 routine care sites across Germany. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD who require systemic therapy were treated with dupilumab as indicated by the Summary of Product Characteristics. Data collected included physician assessments (EASI, BSA, SCORAD, and IGA) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs [POEM, DLQI, EQ-5D-5L, Peak Pruritus NRS and MOS Sleep Scale]). Results: Of 839 patients assessed for eligibility, 828 were included. The full analysis and safety analysis sets comprised 775 and 818 patients, respectively. The number of patients receiving concomitant therapy decreased from baseline to Week 12. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) percentage change in EASI score from baseline to Week 12 was –67.5% (48.4%) and was comparable across the four body regions. The proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 was 59.4% at Week 12. Mean (SD) Peak Pruritus NRS decreased from 7.4 (2.3) at baseline to 3.4 (2.6) at Week 12. Improvements from baseline to Week 12 were reported in all PROs assessed. No new safety signals were observed. Discussion: Improvements in efficacy outcomes and adverse event rates in a real-world setting were more favourable than in phase 3 clinical trials. Conclusions: The 12-week findings of PROLEAD demonstrate that treatment with dupilumab is effective and well tolerated, with rapid onset of action in signs, symptoms and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe AD in the real world. Trial Registration Number: DUPILL08907; NIS-Nr. 433. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dupilumab is the first biologic licensed to treat patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who require systemic therapy. PROLEAD was designed to document the real-world effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The present study aims to describe the baseline characteristics of patients treated with dupilumab in Germany. Methods: PROLEAD is a national, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study, with a 2-year observation period. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab were included. Baseline characteristics, physician assessments, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. Results: The study involved 126 sites throughout Germany. Of 839 patients assessed for eligibility, 828 were included, with baseline data available for 817 patients. Mean (standard deviation, SD) age of patients was 43.4 (15.8) years, with 396 (48.5%) patients being female. Overall, 66.6% of patients received their first diagnosis of AD during childhood. In total, 423 (51.8%) patients had co-existing atopic and type 2 inflammatory diseases, including allergic conjunctivitis (36.8%) and bronchial asthma (22.5%). Overall, 61.4% of patients had received systemic therapy, most commonly oral corticosteroids (49.9%). Approximately half of patients (51.3%) had received UV/phototherapy prior to baseline. Treatment with moderate-potent (Class 2) or potent (Class 3) topical corticosteroids was the most common concomitant treatment at baseline. However, 50.4% of patients had not received concomitant AD treatment with dupilumab at baseline. The most reported reason for initiating dupilumab was "Topical therapy alone was not sufficient" (95.1%). Mean (SD) physician assessments: EASI: 22.9 (14.5); SCORAD: 63.3 (16.2); IGA: 3.3 (0.7). Mean (SD) PROs: DLQI: 13.9 (7.1); peak pruritus NRS: 7.4 (2.3). Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD present a long medical history, impaired quality of life, and high prevalence of co-existing type 2 inflammatory diseases. Dupilumab was used as a first-line systemic treatment in 38.6% of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease. Many patients are initiating a systemic therapy, if the disease is not adequately controlled with topical treatment only. Currently, there is little real-world evidence on the AD-related medical care situation in Germany. This study analyzed patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with systemically treated AD for the German healthcare system. Methods: In this descriptive, retrospective cohort study, aggregated anonymized German health claims data from the InGef research database were used. Within a representative sample of four million insured individuals, patients with AD and systemic drug therapy initiation (SDTI) in the index year 2017 were identified and included into the study cohort. Systemic drug therapy included dupilumab, systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and systemic immunosuppressants (SIS). Patients were observed for one year starting from the date of SDTI in 2017. Results: 9975 patients were included (57.8% female, mean age 39.6 years [SD 25.5]). In the one-year observation period, the most common systemic drug therapy was SCS (> 99.0%). Administrations of dupilumab (0.3%) or dispensations of SIS were rare (cyclosporine: 0.5%, azathioprine: 0.6%, methotrexate: 0.1%). Median treatment duration of SCS, cyclosporine and azathioprine was 27 days, 102 days, and 109 days, respectively. 2.8% of the patients received phototherapy; 41.6% used topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor. Average annual costs for medications amounted to € 1237 per patient. Outpatient services were used by 99.6% with associated mean annual costs of € 943; 25.4% had at least one hospitalization (mean annual costs: € 5836). 5.3% of adult patients received sickness benefits with associated mean annual costs of € 5026. Conclusions: Despite unfavorable risk–benefit profile, this study demonstrated a common treatment with SCS, whereas other systemic drug therapy options were rarely used. Furthermore, the results suggest a substantial economic burden for patients with AD and SDTI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]