Search

What is «liquidable» and how should this concept be faced by arbitrators and judges? Can an enforcement judge determine concepts such as costs, interests and/or penalties if the arbitral tribunal has not provided any parameters? What fundamental rights might be violated? In accordance with international arbitration practice, we will deal here with the problems arising from the division of functions between judges and arbitrators in relation to the enforcement of the «liquidable» concepts.

What is «liquidable» and how should this concept be faced by arbitrators and judges? Can an enforcement judge determine concepts such as costs, interests and/or penalties if the arbitral tribunal has not provided any parameters? What fundamental rights might be violated? In accordance with international arbitration practice, we will deal here with the problems arising from the division of functions between judges and arbitrators in relation to the enforcement of the «liquidable» concepts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La ejecución de los actos administrativos cuenta con una regulación parcial en la Ley Orgánica de Procedimientos Administrativos, que recién cumple treinta años de vigencia, y con una regulación sectorial que ha venido desarrollándose durante las últimas dos décadas y que ha contribuido a ampliar las modalidades de ejecución contempladas en la ley, mediante la adopción de medidas administrativas cautelares o provisionales que adopta la administración pública en el marco de los procedimientos administrativos.

Execution of administrative actions has a partial regulation on the Organic Law of Administrative Procedures. This law had just 30 years effect and a sector-specific regulation that has been developed over the past two decades; all this has been contributed to expand execution modalities provided in law by means of adopting precautionary or provisional administrative measures made by the Public Administration in the frame of administrative procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]