Search

Background Despite new methods for treating complete stenosis of the nasolacrimal duct dacryocystorhinostomy remains the standard operation. Implanting a nasolacrimal polyurethane stent through the nasolacrimal duct to preserve the natural lacrimal pathway seems to offer alternative procedure with similar success rate and without skin incision and general anesthesia. We examined whether an anatomically correct position increases its success rates. Methods This prospective study included 40 patients (mean age 57 years). The polyurethane stent was implanted during dacryocystography, and its position was checked at follow-up visits after 6 months. In the event of an additional canalicular stenosis a 45-mm-long stent was implanted, in the other patients a 35-mm-long stent. Results A dacryocystographically correct position was found in only 21 of 40 patients; in the other 19 the stent did not enter the nose under the inferior concha. However, there was no correlation between correct position under the inferior concha and success rate. In 8 of the 40 patients the stent was not patent. Conclusion The postoperative success rate cannot be predicted by the radiographic position along the ductus nasolacrimalis.

Both dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy are well established in the evaluation of stenoses of the lacrimal drainage system. They provide limited information about the ductal anatomy itself and about periductal structures. MR imaging was evaluated for its capability to directly visualize the lacrimal drainage system in detail and simultaneously provide functional characterization of dacryostenosis. Subjects and methods: Twenty-seven lacrimal drainage systems of 23 patients suffering from epiphora were examined in an MR unit before and after conjunctival and intravenous application of Gd-DTPA using a surface coil. Results: Dacryostenosis was found in 23 of 27 lacrimal systems. Stenoses were localized to the canalicular (n = 3), saccular (n = 8), and ductal (n = 12) level, and were classified as stenosis or occlusion. Conclusion: MR imaging with conjunctival contrast application allows within one examination both detailed morphological and functional assessment of the lacrimal drainage system with depiction of surrounding structures. Limitations arise mainly from demands on technical and patient-related preconditions.