1. Water distribution in dentin matrices: Bound vs. unbound water
- Author
-
Débora Lopes Salles Scheffel, Anuradha Prakki, Kelli A. Agee, Ghada H. Naguib, Tariq S. Abuhaimed, Hyea Hwang, Martha G Brackett, Franklin Chi Meng Tay, Lorenzo Breschi, David H. Pashley, Manar Abu Nawareg, Seung Soon Jang, Geneviève Grégoire, Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay, Chen Chen, Agee, Kelli A, Prakki, Anuradha, Abu-Haimed, Tariq, Naguib, Ghada H., Nawareg, Manar Abu, Tezvergil-Mutluay, Arzu, Scheffel, Debora L.S., Chen, Chen, Jang, Seung Soon, Hwang, Hyea, Brackett, Martha, Grégoire, Geneviéve, Tay, Franklin R., Breschi, Lorenzo, and Pashley, David H.
- Subjects
Hydrogen bonding ,Materials science ,Evaporation ,In Vitro Techniques ,Article ,Acetone ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Acid Etching, Dental ,Dry weight ,Adhesive dentistry ,Materials Testing ,Dentin ,medicine ,Humans ,Bound water ,Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate ,General Materials Science ,Relative humidity ,Desiccation ,Composite material ,Tooth Demineralization ,General Dentistry ,ta313 ,Ethanol ,Hydrogen bond ,Dental Bonding ,Water ,Resin Cements ,Bulk water ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,chemistry ,Mechanics of Materials ,Dentin-Bonding Agents ,Solvents ,Dentistry (all) ,Molar, Third ,Adsorption ,Collagen ,Materials Science (all) ,Nuclear chemistry - Abstract
Objective This work measured the amount of bound versus unbound water in completely-demineralized dentin. Methods Dentin beams prepared from extracted human teeth were completely demineralized, rinsed and dried to constant mass. They were rehydrated in 41% relative humidity (RH), while gravimetrically measuring their mass increase until the first plateau was reached at 0.064 (vacuum) or 0.116 g H2O/g dry mass (Drierite). The specimens were then exposed to 60% RH until attaining the second plateau at 0.220 (vacuum) or 0.191 g H2O/g dry mass (Drierite), and subsequently exposed to 99% RH until attaining the third plateau at 0.493 (vacuum) or 0.401 g H2O/g dry mass (Drierite). Results Exposure of the first layer of bound water to 0% RH for 5 min produced a -0.3% loss of bound water; in the second layer of bound water it caused a -3.3% loss of bound water; in the third layer it caused a -6% loss of bound water. Immersion in 100% ethanol or acetone for 5 min produced a 2.8 and 1.9% loss of bound water from the first layer, respectively; it caused a -4 and -7% loss of bound water in the second layer, respectively; and a -17 and -23% loss of bound water in the third layer. Bound water represented 21-25% of total dentin water. Chemical dehydration of water-saturated dentin with ethanol/acetone for 1 min only removed between 25 and 35% of unbound water, respectively. Significance Attempts to remove bound water by evaporation were not very successful. Chemical dehydration with 100% acetone was more successful than 100% ethanol especially the third layer of bound water. Since unbound water represents between 75 and 79% of total matrix water, the more such water can be removed, the more resin can be infiltrated. © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials.
- Published
- 2015