1. Scholarly publication venue recommender systems
- Author
-
Javad Ghazimirsaeid, Hossein Dehdarirad, and Ammar Jalalimanesh
- Subjects
Review study ,Information retrieval ,Computer science ,RSS ,05 social sciences ,Cosine similarity ,Scopus ,02 engineering and technology ,computer.file_format ,Library and Information Sciences ,Recommender system ,Field (computer science) ,Systematic review ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,020201 artificial intelligence & image processing ,0509 other social sciences ,050904 information & library sciences ,Social network analysis ,computer ,Information Systems - Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this investigation is to identify, evaluate, integrate and summarize relevant and qualified papers through conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) on the application of recommender systems (RSs) to suggest a scholarly publication venue for researcher's paper.Design/methodology/approachTo identify the relevant papers published up to August 11, 2018, an SLR study on four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and ScienceDirect) was conducted. We pursued the guidelines presented by Kitchenham and Charters (2007) for performing SLRs in software engineering. The papers were analyzed based on data sources, RSs classes, techniques/methods/algorithms, datasets, evaluation methodologies and metrics, as well as future directions.FindingsA total of 32 papers were identified. The most data sources exploited in these papers were textual (title/abstract/keywords) and co-authorship data. The RS classes in the selected papers were almost equally used. DBLP was the main dataset utilized. Cosine similarity, social network analysis (SNA) and term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF) algorithm were frequently used. In terms of evaluation methodologies, 24 papers applied only offline evaluations. Furthermore, precision, accuracy and recall metrics were the popular performance metrics. In the reviewed papers, “use more datasets” and “new algorithms” were frequently mentioned in the future work part as well as conclusions.Originality/valueGiven that a review study has not been conducted in this area, this paper can provide an insight into the current status in this area and may also contribute to future research in this field.
- Published
- 2020