Search

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Denne undersøgelse beror på et casestudie af udviklingen og koordineringen i et omfattende civilt-kommunalt partnerskab kaldet »Tippen Syder«, der udgør en formel samarbejdsorganisering mellem en række centrale civilsamfunds- og kommunale aktører i København. Partnerskabet har siden dets etablering i 2008 stået for at koordinere og udføre naturpleje, formidling og aktiviteter på Sydhavnstippen, et større naturområde i byen ejet af Københavns Kommune og statens udviklingsselskab By & Havn. Med afsæt i den pragmatiske sociolog Laurent Thévenots engagementssociologi udfolder artiklen en integreret analyse og undersøgelse af, hvilke institutionelle og organisatoriske forhold der igennem partnerskabet rammesætter vilkårene for det civile engagement i udviklingen af området. Grundet dets særlige ejerskabsforhold inkarneret i udviklingsmodellen bag By & Havn har Sydhavnstippen som sted en længerevarende og endnu aktuel bypolitisk historik præget af modsatrettede interesser vedrørende områdets fremtidige brug. På den baggrund lægger vi vægt på at vise, at Thévenots analytiske ramme tillader os at integrere centrale intuitioner fra både kritiske bystydier og neo-institutionel teori i en mere omfattende forståelsesramme for de muligheder og udgrænsninger, situationen rummer for de civile aktørers engagement. Herunder argumenterer vi for, at pragmatisk bysociologi tydeliggør en praksisnær begrebsliggørelse af de forskellige niveauer af institutionelle imperativer, som former moralsk-politiske koordineringer i partnerskabet gennem varierende grader af asymmetri og udgrænsning. In this article, we explore through a case study the coordination in a longterm civic-municipal partnership developing the public urban green space Sydhavnstippen, a major recreational greenspace located in the Copenhagen, and owned by the Copenhagen City & Port Development Corporation. Since the partnership's establishment in 2008 key civic- and municipal actors have been collaborating on coordinating and carrying out voluntary nature conservation work, and other activities on the greenspace. Invoking Laurent Thévenots sociology of engagement we unfold an integrated analysis, highlighting how certain institutional and organizational settings frames the urbanpolitical space of civic engagement in the greenspace planning and development. Due to the special landownership embodied in the development model behind City & Port, Sydhavnstippen have long been a contested public urban greenspace characterized by urban-political tensions and ambiguities in regard to its future development. Following this, we argue that Thévenot analytical approach allow us to integrate key insights from both critical and neo-institutional theory, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive framework identifying what possibilities and bounds the situation accommodates for the civic engagements. Furthermore, we argue that pragmatic urban sociology contributes to a novel conceptualization of the different levels of institutional imperatives that shapes and binds the social coordination within the partnership through varying degrees of asymmetry and delimitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dansk Sociologi is the property of Djøf Forlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)