Search

Reviews the various diagnostics for radical electric field profile. Need for detailed physical measurements; Heavy ion beam profile and motional stark effect; Electric field determination through poloidal and toroidal measurement.

New experimental evidence of the correlation between edge sheared E× B flow and reduction of turbulence has been measured in the CASTOR tokamak ( R = 0.4 m, a = 0.085 m, BT = 1 T). A biasing electrode is placed at the separatrix in a configuration which has demonstrated strongly sheared electric fields and consequent improvement of the global particle confinement. A set of movable electrostatic probes (rake, Langmuir, Gundestrup, and rotating Mach) provide redundant, simultaneous measurements of poloidal flow, toroidal flow, electron temperature, density, and radial electric field with high temporal resolution and at the same poloidal location. Particular effort has been made in the optimization of the Gundestrup probe collector geometry in order to reduce the relative uncertainty of Mach number measurements in plasmas with weak flow ( M∥, M⊥ < 0.1). The measurements from the rake, Gundestrup, and rotating Mach probes give three independent radial profiles of E× B shear in ohmic and biased modes. Good agreement is obtained both for the profile shape and its absolute magnitude. The plasma flows, especially the poloidal E× B drift velocity, are strongly modified in the sheared region, reaching Mach numbers as high as half the sound speed. The corresponding shear rates (≈5×106 s-1) derived from both the flow and electric field profiles are in excellent agreement and are at least an order of magnitude higher than the growth rate of unstable turbulent modes as estimated from fluctuation measurements. In addition, we compare the measured E× B ion mass flow with the phase velocity of fluctuations moving poloidally across the Gundestrup collectors. Given the poloidal separation of the collecting plates and the sampling frequency (5 MHz), the maximum detectable phase velocity turns out to be rather modest compared to the measured bulk poloidal flow speed. Therefore the two quantities are only compared when the poloidal speed is low; in that case, they show similar behaviour in response to the applied bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]