Search

The Sars coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in increased morbidity and mortality; however, there is limited understanding of how excess mortality is distributed among different racial and ethnic subgroups and vascular diseases., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study design using data from the United States (US) Center for Disease Control (CDC) Wide Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (Wonder) database. The database contains death certificate information for all US residents by cause of death as ascertained by the treating physician. We examined the trends of excess death by vascular disease specific mortality among different racial and ethnicity subgroups. Excess deaths were defined as the difference between observed numbers of deaths in specific time periods and the expected numbers of deaths in the same time periods. We compared mortality rates during the reference period of 2018-2019 (pre-pandemic) with the study period of 2020-2021 (pandemic years). We also compared excess mortality rates among racial and ethnic subgroups (Non-Hispanic white, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic individuals). Vascular disease was categorized by administrative diagnostic codes (ICD10): Vascular disease (I26, I82, I70-73, I74) and its subtypes Arterial thrombosis (I74), venous thromboembolism (I26, I82) and atherosclerotic disease (I70-73)., Results: Compared to 2018-2019, there was a 1.3 % excess mortality associated with vascular disease, a 12.2 % excess mortality due to arterial thrombosis mortality, and an 8.0 % excess mortality due to thromboembolism in 2020-2021. Black individuals demonstrated higher excess vascular mortality (6.9 %) compared to white individuals (-0.3 %) P < .001, higher excess venous thromboembolism mortality (14.1 % vs 5.1 % P = 0.002) and higher atherosclerosis mortality (2.1 % vs -2.6 % P = 0.002). Hispanics compared to white individuals had higher excess vascular mortality (5.1 % vs -0.3 % P = 0.03) and excess venous thromboembolism mortality (24.2 % vs 5.1 % P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant and persistent increase in vascular mortality. Excess mortality has disproportionately affected Black and Hispanic individuals compared to white individuals, highlighting the need for further studies to address and eliminate these health care disparities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no disclosures pertinent to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with high cardiovascular risk and mortality. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) has been linked to adverse events in patients with mild-moderate CKD. We sought to investigate whether MPO levels are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with CKD. We studied participants with mild to moderate CKD in the prospective chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC). We followed patients for incident heart failure (HF), death, and composite outcome (myocardial infarction, incident peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular accident and death). A total of 3872 patients were included (2702 without CVD, 1170 with CVD). After multiple adjustments, doubling of MPO in patients with prior CAD was associated with risk of HF (HR 1.15 [1.01-1.30], P = 0.032) and mortality (HR 1.16 [1.05-1.30], P = 0.005), and composite outcome of MI, PAD, CVA and death (HR 1.12 [1.01-1.25], P = 0.031). In this cohort of patients with mild to moderate CKD and CAD, MPO levels are independently associated with incident HF, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is one of the most common leukemias experienced in adults and conveys significant morbidity and mortality. While the traditional anthracycline based treatments of AML involves cytarabine, developments in alternatives (liposomal cytarabine, fludarabine, cladribine, azacitidine, decitabine), and targeted agents (midostaurin, gilteritinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax) exist. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events, notably pericardial toxicity, have been observed in small studies; however, to date little is known about the comparative pericardial toxicity among these newer regimens. Due to the paucity of data, we sought to investigate the reported pericardial events and mortality associated with treatments for AML. Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all adverse events associated with FDA approved treatments for AML (2002-2022). Pericardial events were defined as pericarditis, pericardial effusion and tamponade. We excluded any individuals with age <18 years old. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with pericardial events. Out of 94,262 reported adverse events, 675 pericardial toxicities were included (243 pericarditis, 479 tamponade). Pericardial events occurred less often in Cladribine (0.3%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P < 0.001), Venetoclax (0.3%, P < 0.001), enasidenib (0.3%, P value < 0.001), and ivosidenib (0.3%, P < 0.001) compared to Cytarabine (0.9%). Tamponade events occurred significantly less often in cladribine (0.1%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P = 0.001), enasidenib (0.1%, P = 0.006), ivosidenib (0.1%, P = 0.01), and venetoclax (0.1%, P < 0.001) compared to cytarabine 0.7%. After adjusting for age and sex, Cladribine (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.18-0.68], P = 0.008) and Fludarabine (ROR 0.65 [0.45-0.92], P = 0.03), venetoclax (ROR 0.57 [0.41-0.79], P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with lower incidence of reported pericardial events. While cytarabine has been the routinely used and/or drug of choice for induction chemotherapy for AML, alternatives like cladribine may have a greater safety profile regarding pericardial toxicities. Future studies should be directed at further investigating cardiovascular safety profiles of AML induction therapy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the leading cause of long-term graft dysfunction in patients with heart transplantation and is linked with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosing CAV is coronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound during traditional invasive coronary angiography. Invasive imaging, however, carries increased procedural risk and expense to patients in addition to requiring an experienced interventionalist. With the improvements in non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities such as transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, an alternative non-invasive imaging approach for the early detection of CAV may be feasible. In this systematic review, we explored the literature to investigate the utility of non-invasive imaging in diagnosis of CAV in >3000 patients across 49 studies. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses for each imaging modality. Overall, all 4 imaging modalities show good to excellent accuracy for identifying CAV with significant variations across studies. Majority of the studies compared non-invasive imaging with invasive coronary angiography without intravascular imaging. In summary, non-invasive imaging modalities offer an alternative approach to invasive coronary imaging for CAV. Future studies should investigate longitudinal non-invasive protocols in low-risk patients after heart transplantation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)