Search

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by extensive clinical and biological heterogeneity. Despite vast advances in understanding the molecular pathology in AML during the last two decades few new AML therapeutics have been approved by the European Medicines Agency. Since 2005 only the epigenetic modulators decitabine and azacytidine, as well as histamine (plus interleukin- 2) have been approved against AML. None of these have outstanding efficiency, and decitabine and azacytdine have only been incorporated in frontline therapy of AML with limited enthusiasm. The majority of AML patients are frail and elderly, and lack of mild but effective agents for this patient cohort constitutes a major unmet need as overall survival remains poor. Along with the recent advancements in the molecular characterization of AML, numerous targeted therapies have been tested in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the biological rationale for a selection of these novel therapeutic approaches, including epigenetic modifiers, agents targeting signalling pathways and inhibitors of nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. Further we discuss some of the possible shortcomings in current trial design that could explain the apparent incoherence between our improved biological knowledge and the lack of progress in therapy development of AML.

Characterization of epigenetic events in carcinogenesis has led to the discovery of a new class of oncogenes and thereby a new class of therapeutic targets. Among the new therapeutic approaches are modulation of protein lysine acetylation through inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs deacetylate histones as well as transcription factors and can modulate gene expression through both these mechanisms in normal and malignant cells. Furthermore, acetylation is an important posttranslational modulation of several proteins involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in normal as well as cancer cells. Even though several HDAC inhibitors have been characterized in vitro, only a limited number of these agents are in clinical trials. Various HDAC inhibitors differ in their toxicity profile when comparing the side effects described in the available clinical studies of HDAC inhibition in the treatment of cancer. These drugs may also affect normal hematopoiesis; hematologic toxicity is common to many drugs but stimulation of hematopoiesis seems to occur for others. HDAC inhibitors usually affect < 10% of the genes in cancer cells. Divergent effects of HDAC inhibition on the global gene expression profiles have been described when testing various cancer cells, and this is further complicated by altered HDAC expression induced by HDAC inhibitors. However, increased p21 expression seems to be a common characteristic for most studies, suggesting an important role of this molecule during HDAC inhibitory treatment. Even though the initial studies are encouraging, additional in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization is definitely needed.

Regulation of cell death (apoptosis) is frequently affected in the development of malignant diseases, and all molecular steps from extracellular signalling receptors through intracellular pathways, cell death rheostats and cell death executioners may be involved. Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic member of a family of anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins that is upregulated in a variety of cancers and specifically overexpressed through chromosomal translocation in some non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Experimental attenuation of Bcl-2 lowers the threshold for undergoing chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Therefore, therapeutic targeting of Bcl-2 appears as an attractive approach currently intensely explored using mRNA degradation strategies and small inhibitory molecules. One phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide antisense against Bcl-2 mRNA, oblimersen (Genasense, G3139), has been used in a substantial number of clinical trials. In this review we will discuss the current developments of G3139, and scrutinize its proposed mechanism of action. Several studies indicate that G3139 involves various intracellular mechanisms and modulation of the immune system. To this date G3139 has not been justified in cancer therapy due to modest or absent effects. But, surprisingly, some of its off-target effects may represent useful therapeutic principles. Therefore, antisense uptake improvements and new design of the oligonucleotide may provide us with useful therapeutics, including both the targeted gene and new anticancer mechanisms. This may be another example of how targeted therapy molecules evolve into multimodality drugs when moved from laboratory bench to bedside use, and illustrate our limited ability for target prediction and scant understanding of biological systems when designing therapeutic strategies.

The anti-oncogene TP53 is frequently mutated in human cancer, but in hematological malignancies this is a rare feature. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) more than 90% of the patients comprise wild type TP53 in their cancer cells, but if TP53 is mutated or deleted the disease is often found to be chemoresistant. In this review we define proteomics of the oncogene product p53 as the study of proteins in the p53 regulating signaling networks, as well as the protein study of members of the p53 family itself. Various messenger RNA splice forms as well as a multitude of post-translational modifications give a high number of protein isoforms in the p53 family. Some of the proteomic techniques allow detection of various isoforms, such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in combination with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and this methodology may therefore increasingly be used as a diagnostic tool in human disease. We introduce the p53 protein as an illustration of the complexity of post-translational modifications that may affect one highly connected protein and discuss the possible impact in AML diagnostics if the p53 profile is reflecting cell stress and status of signal transduction systems of the malignancy.

Global gene expression analysis by way of DNA microarrays and real time quantitative PCR provides an important supplement to established diagnosis and classification of malignant disease. A comprehensive molecular understanding of the regulatory modules involved in carcinogenesis should also be important for improved identification of therapeutic targets and thus for future individualized therapy, e.g., by allowing therapeutic synergy when designing combination therapy against vulnerable points in the malignant cells. The therapeutic potential of knowledge obtained from global gene expression analysis of malignant cells is crucially dependent upon a similarly fine-grained knowledge of gene regulation in normal cells. The deviant gene expression patterns should therefore be assessed on a background of gene expression associated with housekeeping functions, particular differentiation stages and epiphenomena due to genomic instability. Since malignant cells originate from transformed precursor cells, such reference information can be obtained from investigations of embryonic and somatic stem cells. Much has recently been learned about the regulatory modules of normal hematopoietic stem cells and their malignant counterparts, and new biologically and clinically relevant patient subgroups as well as novel prognostic and therapeutic molecular markers have been identified. The present review weighs up the results and their potentialities with reference to gene expression analysis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Myeloid malignancies frequently harbor specific mutations in protein tyrosine kinases leading to oncogenic cell signaling. The most extensively investigated example is chronic myeloid leukemia, where the pathogenic tyrosine kinase fusion protein Bcr-Abl is a successful target for disease control by the specific inhibitor imatinib mesylate. In acute myeloid leukemia the receptor tyrosine kinase Flt3 is frequently mutated and inhibitors to impair the oncogenic signaling are in development. In this review we exemplify oncogenic signaling and how signal pathways can be unraveled with help from proteomics-based technologies. The distinction between cell extract and single cell approaches aiming at rigorous standardization and reliable quantitative aspects for future proteomics-based diagnostics is discussed.