1. Ecological and molecular perspectives on responders and non-responders to probiotics and prebiotics
- Author
-
Keisuke Yoshida, Takane Katayama, Miriam N Ojima, Toshitaka Odamaki, Mikiyasu Sakanaka, and Lin Jiang
- Subjects
Milk, Human ,biology ,business.industry ,Ecology ,Synbiotics ,Probiotics ,Prebiotic ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Biomedical Engineering ,Oligosaccharides ,Bioengineering ,biology.organism_classification ,law.invention ,Probiotic ,Non responders ,Prebiotics ,Infant formula ,law ,Humans ,Medicine ,Bifidobacterium ,business ,Biotechnology - Abstract
Bifidobacteria are widely used as a probiotic for their health-promoting effects. To promote their growth, bifidogenic prebiotics, including human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), have been added to supplements and infant formula. However, the efficacy of both probiotic and prebiotic interventions is often debated, as clinical responses vary significantly by case. Here, we review clinical studies that aimed to proliferate human-residential Bifidobacterium (HRB) strains in the gut, and we highlight the difference between responders and non-responders to such interventions through an ecological, niche-based perspective and an examination of the prevalence of genes responsible for prebiotic assimilation in HRB genomes. We discuss the criteria necessary to better evaluate the efficacy of probiotic and prebiotic interventions and the recent therapeutic potential shown by synbiotics.
- Published
- 2022