Search

Real-world treatment and monitoring patterns have not been well documented among imatinib-treated chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients. Thus, we evaluated these patterns and responses to imatinib in CP-CML patients.This retrospective study, based on the Georgia Cancer Specialists' electronic medical record (EMR) system, identified CP-CML patients initiating treatment with imatinib from 01/01/2002 to 11/01/2011 who were subsequently followed for ≥6 months.A total of 177 patients met the study criteria. Imatinib dose modification occurred in 59 patients (33%). Rates of treatment interruption, discontinuation, and switching to another therapy were 16%, 24%, and 23%, respectively. Of 27 patients discontinuing imatinib for lack of efficacy, 9 (33%) had initial dose escalation; 26 patients (96%) eventually switched to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. By 3 months, 168 patients remained on imatinib, of whom 96 (57%) had undergone cytogenetic and/or molecular testing. The frequency of response monitoring fluctuated over time, with rates as high as 28% for cytogenetic and 69% for molecular testing. Cumulative response rates steadily increased; 18 month rates were 47% for complete cytogenetic response and 26% for major or complete molecular response. There were no cases of progression and/or death among 38 patients who were regularly monitored for molecular response within the first 12 months of imatinib. Ten of 98 patients (10%) not regularly monitored had progressed or died.Almost one-third of patients initiating imatinib for CP-CML required dose modification, treatment interruption, or discontinuation. Opportunities for improved monitoring in this setting were identified. Limitations include those inherent to retrospective analyses based on EMR and the uncertain extrapolability of the results.

Monitoring treatment response is an integral part of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. The guidelines recommend regular monitoring using standard methods (e.g., real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction based on the international scale for molecular response) and treatment adjustment when failure is detected among patients treated with imatinib. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world monitoring and therapy adjustment in this patient population in the US.Twenty-nine physicians from community practices across the US participated in an online chart review. Adult patients with chronic phase CML who initiated imatinib as first-line therapy during 2006-2010 were selected. Information was collected up to 36 months after imatinib initiation, including response monitoring, response status, and therapy adjustment upon treatment failure.The study included 297 eligible patients. By 18 months, 47% of patients had received cytogenetic response assessment continuously as recommended by the guidelines. The corresponding proportion was 39% for continuous molecular response assessment. Among patients who experienced treatment failure by 18 months, only 14%-38% of patients switched to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Leukemia Net guidelines.Major limitations included limited generalizability and the inability to accurately assess molecular response due to the variations in testing methods during the study period.Based on the guidelines, the rates of treatment monitoring and switching upon failure were low, demonstrating the need for improvement in CML care in community settings in the US.

Molecular monitoring using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts using the international scale (IS) is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European LeukemiaNet for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). This study assessed the impact of the frequency of qPCR testing on progression-free survival (PFS).This retrospective chart review of 402 CML-CP patients on first line imatinib therapy, performed by 38 community-based US physicians, analyzed the impact of the frequency of molecular monitoring on the risk of progression and PFS.Time to progression and progression-free survival.Over the 3 year study, 13.2% of patients did not have any qPCR monitoring and 46.3% had 3-4 qPCR tests per year; 5.7% of CML-CP patients progressed to accelerated/blast phase or died. Compared to patients with no qPCR monitoring, those with 3-4 qPCR tests per year had a lower risk of progression (HR = 0.085; p = 0.001) and longer PFS (HR = 0.088; p = 0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders, as did those patients with 1-2 qPCR tests per year (both p0.02). Results were consistent after adjusting for Sokal score when available.This is the first study to document the clinical impact of frequent molecular monitoring, and the findings underscore the importance of regular molecular monitoring in delivering quality care for CML. These findings could be subject to unobserved confounders.