Search

Background: Elevated uric acid (UA) is a recognized risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to investigate whether this association exists in dyslipidemic patients receiving multifactorial treatment., Methods: An observational study conducted in Greece including 1,269 dyslipidemic individuals followed-up in a lipid clinic for ≥3 years. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by CKD-EPI equation and CKD was defined as ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The correlation was assessed between UA levels and the CKD risk after adjusting for potential confounding factors, after defining the following UA quartiles: Q1: < 4, Q2: 4-5, Q3: 5-6, and Q4: > 6 mg/dL., Results: After excluding patients with baseline eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , gout and those taking UA-lowering drugs, 1,095 individuals were eligible; of those, 91% and 69% were treated with statins and anti-hypertensive drugs, respectively. During their follow-up (6 years; IQR = 4-10), 11.9% of the subjects developed CKD, whereas the median annual eGFR decline was 0.69 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR = 0.45-2.33). Multivariate analysis showed that baseline UA levels (HR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.09-1.45, p = .001), female gender (HR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.14-2.65, p = .01), age (HR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.07-1.12, p < .001), diabetes (HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = .03), cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.02-2.58, p = .04), decreased baseline renal function (eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) (HR = 2.38; 95% CI = 1.14-4.81, p = .02), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction (HR = 0.995; 95% CI = 0.991-0.998, p = .01) were associated with incident CKD. Additionally, patients with UA ≥6 mg/dL exhibited a higher risk of incident CKD compared with those in the lowest UA quartile (HR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.11-3.65, p = .02)., Conclusion: Higher UA levels are correlated with a higher risk of incident CKD in dyslipidemic individuals taking multifactorial treatment.

Objective: There is a paucity of data regarding the attainment of lipid-lowering treatment goals according to the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. The aim of the present study was to assess how applicable these 2013 recommendations are in the setting of an Outpatient University Hospital Lipid Clinic., Methods: This was a retrospective (from 1999 to 2013) observational study including 1000 consecutive adults treated for hyperlipidemia and followed up for ≥3 years. Comparisons for the applicability of current European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) and recent ACC/AHA guidelines were performed., Results: Achievement rates of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets set by ESC/EAS were 21%, 44% and 62% among patients at very high, high and moderate cardiovascular risk, respectively, receiving statin monotherapy. Among individuals on high-intensity statins only 47% achieved the anticipated ≥50% LDL-C reduction, i.e. the ACC/AHA target. The corresponding rate was significantly greater among those on statin + ezetimibe (76%, p < 0.05). Likewise, higher rates of LDL-C target attainment according to ESC/EAS guidelines were observed in patients on statin + ezetimibe compared with statin monotherapy (37, 50 and 71% for the three risk groups, p < 0.05 for the very high risk group)., Conclusion: The application of the ACC/AHA guidelines may be associated with undertreatment of high risk patients due to suboptimal LDL-C response to high-intensity statins in clinical practice. Adding ezetimibe substantially increases the rate of the ESC/EAS LDL-C target achievement together with the rate of LDL-C lowering response suggested by the ACC/AHA.