Search

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab have demonstrated efficacy for prevention of bleeds among patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) compared to on-demand (OD) use. Evidence investigating clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of non-inhibitor PwHA switching from prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to emicizumab has not been well-established within large real-world datasets. This study aimed to investigate billed annualized bleed rates (ABRb) and total cost of care (TCC) among non-inhibitor PwHA switching from FVIII-prophylaxis to emicizumab-prophylaxis. This retrospective, observational study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, a US administrative claims database. The date of first claim for emicizumab was defined as the index date. OD patients and inhibitor patients were excluded. Bleeds were identified using a list of 535 diagnosis codes. Bayesian models were developed to estimate the probability ABRb worsens and TCC increases after switching to emicizumab. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test statistical significance of changes in ABRb and TCC after switch. Among the 121 identified patients, the difference in mean ABRb between FVIII-prophylaxis (0.68 [SD = 1.28]) and emicizumab (0.55 [SD = 1.48]) was insignificant (p =.142). The mean annual TCC significantly increased for patients switching from FVIII-prophylaxis ($518,151 [SD = $289,934]) to emicizumab ($652,679 [SD = $340,126]; p <.0001). The Bayesian models estimated a 21.0% probability of the ABRb worsening and a 99.9% probability of increasing TCC after switch. This study found that in male non-inhibitor PwHA, switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab incurs substantial cost increase with no significant benefit in ABRb. This evidence may help guide providers, payers, and patients in shared decision-making conversations around best treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the characteristics and initial treatment patterns, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs of patients newly diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-related plexiform neurofibromas (PN).Methods: This was a retrospective study of individuals enrolled in the IBM MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid database from 1 October 2014 to 31 December 2017. Patients aged ≤18 years at the index date (first diagnosis of NF1 or PN, whichever occurred later) with at least 1 ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for both NF1 and PN were included. All-cause HCRU and the associated direct costs during the follow-up period were calculated per patient per year (PPPY) in 2018 USD.Results: A total of 383 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 448 days. Most patients were diagnosed by a specialist (63.5%). During the follow-up period, pain medications were used by 58.5% of patients, 25.1% were treated with chemotherapy, 7.1% received surgery for PN, 1.6% received MEK inhibitors, and 0.8% received radiation. Mean PPPY inpatient, outpatient, ER, pharmacy, and other visits were 1.4, 17.3, 1.6, 13.6, and 25.8, respectively. Mean ± SD (median) total PPPY healthcare costs were $17,275 ± $61,903 ($2889), with total medical costs of $14,628 ± $56,203 ($2334) and pharmacy costs of $2646 ± $13,303 ($26).Conclusions: This study showed that many pediatric patients newly diagnosed with NF1 and PN were initially treated with supportive care only, highlighting a substantial unmet medical need. This study also highlights the considerable economic burden among patients with NF1 and PN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]