Search

Purpose of Review: The purpose is to provide a review of cross-sectional imaging updates in the assessment of gastrointestinal diseases, relevant to clinical practice and research. Recent Findings: New magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents (Eovist) are taken up by hepatocytes and excreted via the biliary tree. As such, a lesion will retain contrast only if hepatocytes are present, which aids in refining the differential diagnosis. Magnetic resonance enterography is a method for non-invasively diagnosing and following various GI conditions, predominantly inflammatory bowel disease. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound uses gas-filled microbubbles providing superb temporal resolution most notably in the arterial phase, which aids in differentiating lesions. Elastography is a new technique which assesses stiffness of liver for evaluating fibrosis. Summary: These new techniques provide more accurate diagnoses and information, often limiting ionizing radiation exposure from other modalities. While ultrasound will still remain the initial imaging modality, familiarity with these other options is valuable for appropriate pathology workup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The small intestine has been difficult to examine by traditional endoscopic and radiologic techniques. Within the past 10 years, advances have led to an explosion of technologies that facilitate examination of the entire small intestine. Wireless video capsule endoscopy, deep enteroscopy using balloon-assisted or spiral techniques, computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography have facilitated the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of patients with small intestinal diseases. These technologies are complementary, each with its advantages and limitations. Capsule endoscopy provides a detailed view of the mucosal surface and has excellent patient acceptance, but does not allow therapeutics. Deep enteroscopy allows careful inspection of the mucosa and therapeutics, but is time consuming and invasive. Enterography (CT or MR) allows examination of the small bowel wall and surrounding structures. The initial best test for detecting small intestinal disease depends on clinical presentation and an astute differential diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]