1. Lexical Influences on Auditory Streaming
- Author
-
John M. Deeks, Matthew H. Davis, Jolijn Monstrey, Alexander J. Billig, and Robert P. Carlyon
- Subjects
Auditory perception ,Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all) ,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all) ,Speech recognition ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Phonetics ,Acoustics ,Biology ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Identity (music) ,Acoustic Stimulation ,Report ,Perception ,Auditory Perception ,Humans ,Attention ,Affect (linguistics) ,Percept ,Syllable ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,Meaning (linguistics) ,media_common - Abstract
Summary Biologically salient sounds, including speech, are rarely heard in isolation. Our brains must therefore organize the input arising from multiple sources into separate “streams” and, in the case of speech, map the acoustic components of the target signal onto meaning. These auditory and linguistic processes have traditionally been considered to occur sequentially and are typically studied independently [1, 2]. However, evidence that streaming is modified or reset by attention [3], and that lexical knowledge can affect reports of speech sound identity [4, 5], suggests that higher-level factors may influence perceptual organization. In two experiments, listeners heard sequences of repeated words or acoustically matched nonwords. After several presentations, they reported that the initial /s/ sound in each syllable formed a separate stream; the percept then fluctuated between the streamed and fused states in a bistable manner. In addition to measuring these verbal transformations, we assessed streaming objectively by requiring listeners to detect occasional targets—syllables containing a gap after the initial /s/. Performance was better when streaming caused the syllables preceding the target to transform from words into nonwords, rather than from nonwords into words. Our results show that auditory stream formation is influenced not only by the acoustic properties of speech sounds, but also by higher-level processes involved in recognizing familiar words., Highlights • Linguistic processing affects perceptual organization • The acoustic elements of words fuse more readily than those of nonwords • Bistable speech sounds share dynamics with other ambiguous perceptual objects
- Full Text
- View/download PDF