Search

Background:  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a potentially lethal respiratory illness caused by a newly identified coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Given the novelty of the virus, high caseloads, and increasing turnaround time for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, accurate information about the clinical course and prognosis of individual patients was largely unknown. This has forced physicians all over the world to brainstorm attempts to come up with reliable indicators like chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for any changes suggestive of COVID-19; surrogate laboratory parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), or interleukin-6 (IL-6) for assessing the severity of the disease; and other organ-specific tests to identify the multiorgan involvement in severe-to-critical COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans play a significant role in the management of COVID-19 disease and serve as an indicator of disease severity and its possible outcome, which might help in the early identification of patients who might need critical care and earlier prognostication., Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a single center in a level 3 critical care unit (CCU) of a 750-bed teaching hospital in Hyderabad, Telangana, India, over a period of six months. All RT-PCR-positive COVID-19 patients admitted to the CCU with CT chest performed within 24 hours of admission were screened for eligibility for this study. CT severity scoring was based on chest HRCT or CT., Results: Of the 110 patients, a majority (36.36%) were aged between 61 and 70 years. The mean age of our study population was 59.65±11.88 years. Of the 110 patients, the majority were admitted to the hospital for 22-28 days (24.55%), followed by 8-14 days (22.72%), and 21.82% were admitted for one day. Of the 110 patients, a majority were admitted to the CCU for seven days (41.82%), followed by 15-21 days (24.55%); and 19.09% were admitted for 8-14 days. Most of the patients were discharged (65.45%), and we had a 34.55% mortality rate in our study. We found a significant association between chest CT severity score (CTSS) and the age of the patient, duration of hospital stay, and duration of CCU stay using multivariate regression analysis., Conclusion: CTSS could be greatly helpful for the screening and early identification of the disease, especially in those patients awaiting an RT-PCR report or with negative RT-PCR, which would lead to appropriate isolation and treatment measures. Early detection could also help assess the progression of the disease, alter the course of management at the earliest point possible, and improve the prognostication of COVID-19 patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Pamulapati et al.)

Background:  Chest CT scans are done in cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive patients to understand the severity of the disease and plan treatment accordingly. Severity is determined according to a 25-point scoring system, however, there could be interobserver variability in using this scoring system thus leading to the different categorization of patients. We tried to look for this interobserver variability and thus find out its reliability., Methods:  The study was retrospective and was done in a designated COVID center. Some 100 patients were involved in the study who tested positive for COVID-19 disease. The research was conducted over six months (January 2021 to June 2021). Images were given to three radiologists with a minimum of 10 years of experience in thoracic imaging working in different setups at different places for interpretation and scoring further and their scores were compared. Before the study, the local ethics committee granted its approval., Results:  There was no significant variability in the interobserver scoring system thus proving its reliability. The standard deviation between different observers was less than three. There was almost perfect agreement amongst all the observers (Fleiss' K=0.99 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.995-0.998]). Maximum variations were observed in the moderate class.  Conclusion: There was minimum inter-observer variability in the 25-point scoring system thus proving its reliability in categorizing patients according to severity. There was no change in the class of the patient according to its severity. A 25-point scoring system hence can be used by clinicians to plan treatment and thus improve a patient's prognosis., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Jakhotia et al.)

Background Computed tomography (CT) scans and CT severity scores (CTSS) are widely used to assess the severity and prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CTSS has performed well as a predictor in differentiating severe from non-severe cases. However, it is not known if CTSS performs similarly in hospitalized severe cases with hypoxia at admission. Methods We conducted a retrospective comparative study at a COVID-care center from Western India between 25th April and 31st May 2021, enrolling all consecutive severe COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia (peripheral oxygen saturation < 94%). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, ferritin, and CT thorax were done within 24h of admission before being initiated on any anti-COVID-19 therapy. CTSS was calculated by visual assessment and categorized into three severity categories and was correlated with laboratory markers and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was done using John's Macintosh Project (JMP) 15.0.0 ver. 3.0.0 (Cary, North Carolina). Results The median age of the study population (n-298) was 59 years (24-95) with a male preponderance (61.41%, n=183). The 15 and 30-day survivals were 67.64% and 59.90%, respectively. CTSS did not correlate with age, gender, time from vaccination, symptoms, or comorbidities but had a significant though weak correlation with LDH (p=0.009), D-dimer (p=0.006), and NLR (p=0.019). Comparing demographic and laboratory aspects using CT severity categories, only NLR (p=0.0146) and D-dimer (p=0.0006) had significant differences. The 15d-OS of mild, moderate, and severe CT categories were 88.62%, 70.39%, and 52.62%, respectively, while 30d-OS of three categories were 59.08%, 63.96%, and 49.12%, respectively. Conclusion Among hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia at admission, CT severity categories correlate well with outcomes but not inflammatory markers at admission., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Yanamandra et al.)

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of typical and atypical thoracic CT findings in patient groups diagnosed during different periods of the pandemic, examine disease severity using radiological scoring methods, and determine the relationship between atypical CT findings and disease severity., Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty-one patients with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and thoracic CT scan were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as group 1 (March to August 2020) diagnosed in the first six months of the pandemic and group 2 (September 2020 to February 2021) diagnosed in the second six months. CT images of the patients were analyzed for the frequency of typical and atypical findings. Evaluation was made in terms of disease suspicion and severity by scoring methods, and the relationship between atypical findings and disease severity was examined., Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the frequency and distribution patterns of typical CT findings observed in both groups. The most common atypical finding in both groups was nodular lesions. Central distribution, one of the atypical findings, was not seen in group 1, whereas it was present in nine patients in group 2 (p=0.001). The mean CT severity score was higher in group 2, and there was a statistically significant difference between the mean CT scores of both groups (p<0.001). In addition, six (7.2%) patients in group 1 and 34 (50%) patients in group 2 had CT scores above the cut-off value (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between atypical findings and severity score., Conclusion: Other diseases and atypical findings that may accompany COVID-19 pneumonia may increase the rate of misdiagnosis. In the diagnosis of the disease, clinical signs and symptoms and radiological findings should be evaluated together, and it should be kept in mind that lung findings in thorax CT change over time., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Korkmaz et al.)