Search

Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising immunotherapy for various malignancies. However, its use is associated with challenges, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a potentially severe complication. This retrospective study aims to analyze the risks, outcomes, and healthcare burden of CRS in patients undergoing CAR-T therapy. Method Data from the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were utilized, comprising 415 CAR-T-related hospitalizations. They were categorized into those with CRS (n = 68) and those without CRS (n = 347). Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, race, income, insurance status, and comorbidities, were compared. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, and access to complications, associations, and interventions. Statistical analyses, including multivariable models, were employed to assess associations. Results Hospitalizations with CRS did not exhibit significant differences in age, gender, race, income, or insurance status compared to those without CRS. The multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71 to 8.69, p = 0.151), LOS (coefficient = -2.1 days, 95% CI: -5.43 to 1.21, p = 0.207), or total hospital charges (coefficient = $207,456, 95% CI: $6119 to $421,031, p = 0.057) between the two groups. The CRS group had a higher incidence of fever (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.15 to 3.17, p = 0.014), acute respiratory failure (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.40, p= 0.049), and the need for intubation/mechanical ventilation (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.14 to 5.88, p = 0.024). Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) was significantly associated with CRS (aOR = 6.72, 95% CI: 2.03 to 22.18, p = 0.002). Conclusion While the development of CRS in CAR-T-treated patients did not significantly increase mortality, LOS, or total hospital charges, it was associated with specific risks and outcomes, including fever, respiratory failure, and HLH. This study emphasizes the importance of vigilance in recognizing and managing CRS in CAR-T therapy to optimize patient outcomes. The findings contribute valuable insights to guide clinical decision-making in the context of CAR-T therapy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Patel et al.)

One of the most widely accepted forms of treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD) is the implementation of stents into the vessel. This area of research is constantly evolving, ranging from bare-metal stents through drug-eluting stents and, more recently, approaching bioresorbable stents and polymer-free stents. This article reviews the evolution of all these devices and emphasizes how they might be further evolved to provide an optimal coronary stent and overcome unsolved challenges in stent development. We thoroughly evaluated a number of published studies in order to advance coronary stent technologies. Additionally, we looked for various literature that highlighted the inadequacies of the coronary stents that are currently available and how they might be modified to create the optimum coronary stent. Coronary stents have significantly improved clinical outcomes in interventional cardiology, but there are still a number of drawbacks, including an persisted risk of thrombosis due to endothelial injury and in-stent restenosis. Gene eluting stents (GES) and customized coronary stents with self-reporting stent sensors are appealing alternatives to existing stent approaches. Considering the adequacy of these gene eluting stents (GES), customized coronary stents produced by novel 4D printing technologies and integrated self-reporting stent sensors should be assumed for anticipating future advancements to optimal coronary stent devices; however, more interventional evidence is required to determine the future prospects of these stent innovations., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Patel et al.)

Due to the rapid development of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expedited the authorization of immunizations to counteract life-threatening COVID-19 effects. COVID-19 immunization was seen as an essential component of surviving endemically with COVID-19. Although there were no major adverse event reports that mandated an early authorization of the mass vaccination approval in initial studies, a few significant adverse events were reported after real-world usage. The most prevalent adverse events are regional reactions, such as discomfort at the injection site. Anaphylactic shock and acute responses were quite infrequent. Current evidence strongly convince the community that the advantages of immunization outweigh the risks. The review investigates the potential adverse reaction in the form of myocarditis caused by the COVID-19 vaccine. Age, sexuality, vaccination type, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic modalities were among the confounding factors associated with vaccine-induced myocarditis. This picture depicts COVID-19 immunization-induced myocarditis and the treatment options available to practitioners. Further evaluation is needed to establish the underlying cause of this association. We compiled the most recent data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced myocarditis after reviewing available research. Information sources including PubMed and Google Scholar were evaluated retrospectively., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Sharma et al.)

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is exacerbating the worldwide healthcare crisis. The pandemic has had an impact on nearly every system of our body. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave immediate authorization of several vaccines to avoid critical COVID-19 outcomes following the rapid spread of the COVID-19. There have only been a few cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination-induced immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) so far. There should be enough information to identify whether some vaccination adverse effects, such as ITP, are caused by the vaccine. This study aims to determine how common ITP occurs after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, as well as gender, age, symptoms, biomarkers, predicted outcomes, and sequelae. We looked at a number of research and compiled the best evidence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia currently available. To find the recommended reporting items, the search technique included keywords like "Immune thrombocytopenia," "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV-2," and "Vaccination." The search results were grouped using Boolean operators ("OR," "AND")., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Sharma et al.)

Introduction Hyper-cytokinemia is a dreaded complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection and an important predictor of mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current evidence at best is still ambiguous for use of tocilizumab in cytokine storm in COVID-19. Moreover, the factors that are associated with beneficial response from tocilizumab are unknown in COVID-19. We aimed to study the clinical outcomes especially mortality vis-à-vis clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients administered tocilizumab and identify predictors of mortality benefits amongst deceased vs recovered COVID-19 patients. Methods The present study is a retrospective observation of the demographic, clinical, and biological data of all the consecutive patients treated with tocilizumab for COVID-19 pneumonia at the COVID tertiary care centre from July 2020 to October 2020 at Ahmedabad, India. We compared the deceased group with those who recovered/discharged and evaluated patient-level demographics, clinical attributes, and laboratory investigations available to identify subgroups in whom tocilizumab reduced mortality. Results Of the 112 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 56.84 ± 13.56 years and 80 (71.4%) were male. There were 97 (86.6%) patients in the survivors and 15 (13.39%) in the deceased group. Deceased were older than the recovered group (mean: 66.14, SD: 14.41 vs mean: 55.36, SD: 12.98; p=0.04). Hypertension (33.03%) was the commonest comorbidity observed. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with cancer and type-2 diabetes (p=0.05 and p=0.01, respectively). Level of D-dimer and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed trends towards significance as a predictor of mortality (p=0.07 and p=0.08, respectively) not reaching significance. D-dimer level > 5,000 nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) was the significant predictor of subsequent deaths (p<0.0001). Fourteen patients reported adverse events of tocilizumab. Patients who developed in-hospital complications (such as septic or vasodilatory shock and/or sepsis, acute kidney injury, multiorgan dysfunction) had significantly higher mortality (p<0.0001, p=0.009, and p=0.03, respectively). Conclusion Tocilizumab might be more beneficial in younger patients without sepsis/ septic shock, acute kidney injury, multiorgan dysfunction, and who were non-ventilated. The predictors of mortality amongst Asian Indians treated with tocilizumab were older patients, the presence of type-2 diabetes, cancer, in-hospital complication (such as acute kidney injury, sepsis/septic shock, multiorgan dysfunction), higher D-dimer > 5,000 ng/mL. A larger study with pre-defined inclusion cut-offs of these variables may aid in defining patient's characteristics of Asian Indians who may benefit from tocilizumab in COVID-19., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Desai et al.)

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a significant disease burden and is among the leading causes of hospital readmissions, adding a significant burden on healthcare resources. The association between 30-day readmission in a COPD patient undergoing bronchoscopy and a wide range of modifiable potential risk factors, after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, has been assessed, and comparison has been made with COPD patients not undergoing bronchoscopy. Methods We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the 2016 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) of 30-day all-cause readmission among COPD patients undergoing bronchoscopy. A Cox's proportional hazards model was used to obtain independent relative risks of readmission following bronchoscopy in COPD patients as compared to patients not undergoing bronchoscopy. Our primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause readmission rate in both groups. Other secondary outcomes of interest were the 10 most common reasons for readmission, resource utilization, independent predictors of readmission, and relative proportion of comorbidities between the index admission (IA) and the readmission in both groups. Results The overall rate of readmission following bronchoscopy in COPD patients as compared to patients not undergoing bronchoscopy was 17.32% and 15.87%, respectively. The final multivariate model in the bronchoscopy group showed that the variables found to be an independent predictor of readmission were: pulmonary hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-4.25; P < .01), adrenal insufficiency (HR 4.47; 95% CI 1.44-13.85; P = .01) and discharge to rehab status. Independent predictor variables of admission in Group B were gender (women < men; HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.88-0.93; P < .01), and type of insurance (Medicaid > Medicare > private insurance). For all patients undergoing bronchoscopy, the mean length of stay (LOS) for IA was 11.91 ± 20.21 days, and LOS for readmission was 5.87 ± 5.48 days. The mean total cost of IA for patients undergoing bronchoscopy was much higher than that of readmission ($26,916 vs. $12,374, respectively). The entire LOS for readmission was 1,265 days, with a total cost of $2.66 million. For patients not undergoing bronchoscopy during the IA, mean LOS for IA was 4.26 ± 4.27 days, and mean LOS for readmission was 5.39 ± 5.51 days, which was longer than the IA in Group B but still shorter than LOS for readmission in Group A (patients undergoing bronchoscopy). The mean total cost of readmission was higher than the IA ($8,137 for IA vs. $10,893 for readmission). The total LOS in this group of patients was 313,287 days, with the total cost of readmission at $628 million. Conclusions Patients undergoing bronchoscopy have a slightly higher rate of 30-day readmissions as compared to patients not undergoing bronchoscopy, and the LOS is also slightly higher in this group during subsequent readmissions as compared to readmission in patients not undergoing bronchoscopy in IA. The readmission rate in COPD patients is impacted by a variety of social, personal, and medical factors. Patients with multiple medical comorbidities have a higher risk of readmission. In our understanding, bronchoscopy in a patient with acute exacerbation of COPD should be reserved for selected patients, and the rationale should be clarified, as it affects the overall LOS and healthcare expenditure., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, AlHafidh et al.)

Cor triatriatum dexter (CTD) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly in which a membranous structure divides the right atrium (RA) into two chambers. Persistence of the right valve of the sinus venosus, which usually regresses as a part of normal embryological development, is responsible for membranous partition. There is a high incidence of right-sided congenital abnormalities of the heart associated with this condition. Clinical manifestations vary depending on the degree of partitioning or septation of the RA. We present a case of CTD discovered as an incidental finding during transthoracic echocardiography and further discuss the role of two-dimensional echocardiography as a noninvasive diagnostic tool., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2019, Bindra et al.)