Search

Objective: To identify racial disparities in five-year survival rates in women affected by serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the United States (US)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2010 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Women with a primary malignancy of serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma, using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) Topography Coding and ICD-O-3 Histology Coding, were included in this study. Race and ethnicity were combined into the following groups: Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (NHAPI), Non-Hispanic Other (NHO), and Hispanics. Cancer-specific survival was measured at five years post-diagnosis. A comparison of baseline characteristics was assessed using Chi-squared tests. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: From 2010 to 2016, there were 9,630 women with a primary diagnosis of serous ovarian carcinoma identified in the SEER database. A higher proportion of Asian/PI women (90.7%) were diagnosed with high-grade malignancy (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) compared to NHW women (85.4%). NHB women (9.7%) were less likely to undergo surgery when compared to NHW women (6.7%). Hispanic women had the highest proportion of uninsured women (5.9%), while NHW and NHAPI had the lowest (2.2% each). A higher proportion of NHB (74.2%) and Asian/PI (71.3%) women presented with the distant disease compared to NHW women (70.2%). After adjustment for age, insurance, marital status, stage, metastases, and surgical resection, NHB women had the highest hazard of death within five years compared to NHW women (adjusted (adj) HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, p<0.001). Hispanic women also had lower five-year survival probabilities compared to NHW women (adj HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.30, p<0.001). Patients undergoing surgery had significantly increased survival probability compared to those who did not (p<0.001). As expected, women with Grade III and Grade IV disease both had significantly lower five-year survival probabilities compared to Grade I (p<0.001)., Conclusion: This study reveals that there is an association between race and overall survival in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma, with NHB and Hispanic women having the highest hazards of death compared to NHW women. This adds to the existing body of literature as survival outcomes in Hispanic patients relative to NHW patients are not well documented. Because of the potential interplay between overall survival and several factors including race, future studies should aim to investigate other socioeconomic factors that may be impacting survival., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Shingala et al.)

Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal group of breast cancers. Socioeconomic factors may contribute to differences in survival rates. This study aims to identify racial/ethnic disparities in five-year survival rates among women affected by TNBC in the United States. Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from the 2010-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Patients with a primary malignancy of triple-negative breast cancer were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival was measured at five years post-diagnosis. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2010-2016, there were 26,963 women with a primary diagnosis of TNBC. After adjustment for age, insurance, marital status, stage, and surgery type, Hispanic women had the highest hazard of death when compared to White women (adjusted (adj) HR, 1.14, p<0.001). Further, non-Hispanic Black women also had a lower survival probability when compared to White women (adj HR, 1.06, p=0.002). Conclusion This study reveals that Hispanic women had the highest hazard of death when compared to White women. As TNBC is the most fatal breast cancer, future studies should investigate socioeconomic factors that may worsen prognosis of this disease., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Makhani et al.)

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States. Significant disparities exist among racial and ethnic minorities diagnosed with colorectal cancer compared to non-Hispanic Whites. However, understanding of survival outcomes following curative surgical resection in this population is limited., Objective: To evaluate the association between race and colorectal cancer-specific mortality in patients who were treated with major surgical resection of the colon.  Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database from 2010 to 2016. The patient population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with a primary malignancy of colorectal cancer treated with major surgical resection of the colon. The main outcome measures were survival time at one and five years following diagnosis and cancer-specific death., Results: A total of 120,598 patients with primary colorectal malignancy treated with surgical resection of the colon were identified. Across all racial groups, most patients presented with moderately differentiated colorectal cancer. Non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest proportion of diffuse metastases (p<0.001). After adjusting for covariates, Hispanic respondents had the lowest one-year survival (adjusted HR: 1.26, 95%CI (1.21-1.31) and five-year survival when compared to Whites (adjusted HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.10-1.15). Factors associated with a shorter survival include age ≥ 70 years old, unmarried status, metastatic disease, and high-grade tumors (p<0.001).  Conclusions: Racial disparities exist in the overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer who are treated with surgical resection of the colon. Hispanic patients had the highest hazard of death, followed by Non-Hispanic Asian-Pacific Islanders and Non-Hispanic Blacks, compared to Whites. While surgical resection can be curative, the quality and accessibility of post-operative care may differentiate survival outcomes among racial groups., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Shively et al.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between a marker of dietary intake, the carbohydrate-to-fiber (CF) ratio, and moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2013-2016., Participants: Individuals 18 years and older were included. Participants with total energy intake outside of three standard deviations of the mean, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and those with missing data were excluded., Measurements: The main independent variable, CF ratio, was generated using corresponding variables in NHANES and divided into quartiles. The main outcome was depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).  Results: Among all participants (n=9,728), 8.3% reported to have moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms (n=833). The highest proportion of depressive symptoms was reported in respondents in quartile 4 (Q4), with the highest CF ratio (13.0%; p<0.001). After adjustment, the odds of depressive symptoms significantly increased in Q4 of the CF ratio compared with Q1 (adjusted odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9). The prevalence of depressive symptoms significantly increased in females, lower federal poverty levels, non-married individuals, smokers, and hypertension patients.  Conclusion: This nationally representative sample suggests that a higher CF dietary intake ratio increases the risk of moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms. These results suggest that the CF ratio may help clinicians and patients evaluate their dietary risk for depressive symptoms. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this ratio as a dietary measurement., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Makhani et al.)