Search

Introduction: Advanced airway management and ventilation of trauma patients are often needed during acute stabilization and resuscitation and later, in those admitted. In addition to endotracheal intubation for advanced airway management, tracheostomy is commonly used in critically ill patients when prolonged mechanical ventilation is required. However, the outcomes associated with airway management approaches and the timing of a tracheostomy in critically ill patients are mixed. This protocol intended to compare the effect of tracheostomy in major trauma patients vs. management with non-invasive techniques and endotracheal intubation during admission, examine complications and outcomes associated with the three types of airway management approaches, and explore the association of clinical and social determinants of health variables with complications in patients requiring advanced airway management., Methods: A total of 911 adult trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center surgical intensive care unit (SICU) were included in this retrospective, single-center, quantitative study from 2019 to 2021. Descriptive and correlational analyses were used to examine outcomes of ventilator days, length of stay, pneumonia, readmission, mortality, and associations with the airway management approach. The outcomes of ventilator days and length of stay were compared between groups with a one-way ANOVA, and differences between groups on outcomes of pneumonia, readmission, and mortality were estimated using crosstabulations and chi-square (x²) statistics. Hypothesized relationships of clinical and social determinants of health variables associated with outcomes of ventilator days, hospital length of stay, pneumonia, readmission, and mortality in patients requiring advanced airway management ≥ four days were estimated., Results: There was no significant difference in outcomes of pneumonia and mortality between the advanced airway management groups (p=0.856 and p=0.167, respectively). There were significant differences in ventilator days, length of stay (LOS), and readmission. Between the groups: endotracheal intubation only, early (<10 days post-intubation) tracheostomy, and late (>10 days post-intubation) tracheostomy in SICU patients (p <0.001, p=0.028, and p=0.003, respectively). Specifically, patients in the early tracheostomy group had a higher readmission rate (33.3%) as compared to endotracheal tube patients (2.3%) and late tracheostomy patients (0.0%). Social determinants of health variables (smoking and functional dependence) were also significantly correlated with readmission in the early tracheostomy and endotracheal tube airway management groups (p=.047 and p=.022, respectively). Additionally, clinical variables of injury severity scores, ED arrival systolic blood pressure (SBP), and presence of pre-existing comorbidities were found to be significantly associated with complications of pneumonia, readmission, and mortality within the patients (n=229) requiring advanced airway approaches., Conclusion: Adult trauma patients with early tracheostomy airway management may experience a higher readmission rate related to the complexity of their injuries than patients managed with endotracheal intubation or late tracheostomy. Clinical and social determinants of health factors may be associated with complications. Further studies examining these associations in larger samples are needed to examine the validity of these findings., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Good Samaritan University Hospital issued approval (IRB # 22-010). As this research included experimentation on human subjects' data, this study was approved by the institution’s ethics committee, the Good Samaritan University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB # 22-010), receiving an exempt category designation 45 CFR 46.104 Category 4(iii) (2018 Requirements) prior to conducting the research. This research was conducted according to established ethical guidelines, and informed consent was obtained from the participants according to the federal requirements described in 45 CFR 46.104. This research study complies with all regulations and informed consent was obtained as required by 45 CFR 46.104. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Cunningham et al.)

Introduction: Recent revisions of national field triage guidelines recommend the addition of age-specific systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement for identifying the most severely injured children requiring transport to a trauma center. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency in which blood pressures are documented by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers and the role this measurement has had, among other factors, in triage decisions., Methods: This is an exploratory descriptive study with a retrospective review from the trauma registry database of all pediatric trauma admissions that arrived by EMS at a level II pediatric trauma center from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022., Results: Two hundred ninety-eight patient records of patients aged 0 to 14 were included. EMS providers documented blood pressure in 70.1% of the total sample. A significant difference in the frequency of this documentation was seen between ages zero to nine and = > 10 years (χ 2 (1,298) = 28.98 p <0.001). No children ages zero to nine years had SBP of < 70 mmHg + (2x age in years) documented by EMS. There were two children aged = > 10 who had a documented SBP < 90 and 12 children with documented EMS heart rate > SBP., Conclusion: Many children transported by EMS in this hospital's catchment area did have a field blood pressure measurement documented, but the frequency was significantly less in younger-aged children. The blood pressure measurements of children determined to have severe injuries in the sample did not meet the inclusion criteria for high risk of serious injury by the newly established national guidelines. This suggests other prehospital criteria, such as mechanism of injury or visual cues, prompted EMS to transport these pediatric trauma patients to a regional trauma center for specialized care., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board of Good Samaritan University Hospital Office issued approval 2023.06.20.07.15. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Frederick et al.)

Introduction Falls during hospitalization are a leading cause of preventable trauma-related injuries. Factors associated with fall risk include an unfamiliar environment, changes in health status, and efficacy based on the home environment. Assessing fall efficacy with an individualized prevention plan can decrease falls. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the effect of implementing a fall efficacy screening and intervention on reducing patient falls. Methods The study utilized a quasi-experimental, cross-sectional design with a convenience sample of patients admitted to an in-patient adult medical unit within a community hospital over a twelve-month period. Sampling times included pre-implementation, immediately post-implementation, and a second post-implementation phase. The intervention consisted of an admission fall efficacy screening tool and an individualized educational initiative. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics of central tendency and dispersion, along with inferential statistics using independent sample t-tests, chi-square tests, correlations, and binary logistic regression. Results Among the study participants (n=2,074), the total sample had an average age of 67.7 (+/- 17.4) years and had mean scores of 13.3 (6.9) on the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International and 51.8 (20.3) on the Morse Fall Scale. Fifty-two percent of the study population were female; 16.2% of the patients were diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or CVA-like symptoms. Fall rates decreased with a rate of change of -4.15% after efficacy screening and intervention. Males demonstrated higher efficacy in avoiding falls compared to females (t(828) = 3.369, p <0.001). Patients with a CVA diagnosis demonstrated higher efficacy scores compared to non-CVA patients (t(2071) = -3.348, p <0.001). FES risk groups (OR of 5.632, 95% CI (2.171-7.892)) and age over 65 (OR 1.21, 95% CI (1.006-1.442)) were significant predictors of a fall when patients with a primary CVA diagnosis were omitted from the sample (p= 0.022 and 0.046 respectively). Conclusion The findings suggest that efficacy screening may be associated with decreased falls for acute care non-CVA inpatient populations over 65 years of age. Further research into the predictive utility of fall efficacy screening in acute care CVA and non-CVA hospitalized patient populations aged 65 years and above is recommended., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Good Samaritan University Hospital Office of the IRB issued approval IRB#: 2019.05.22.01. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Ragione et al.)

Introduction: Although numerous risk factors and prediction models affecting morbidity and mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients have been previously identified, there are scant published data on predictors for perioperative Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) admission in this patient population. Determining if a patient will need an SICU admission would not only allow for the appropriate allocation of resources and personnel but also permit targeted clinical management of these patients with the goal of improving morbidity and mortality outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify specific risk factors predictive of SICU admission in a population of geriatric hip fracture patients. Unlike previous studies which have investigated predominantly demographic, comorbidity, and laboratory data, the present study also considered a frailty index and length of time from injury to presentation in the Emergency Department (ED)., Methods: A total of 501 geriatric hip fracture patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center were included in this retrospective, single-center, quantitative study from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. Using a logistical regression analysis, more than 25 different variables were included in the regression model to identify values predictive of SICU admission. Predictive models of planned versus unplanned SICU admissions were also estimated. The discriminative ability of variables in the final models to predict SICU admission was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves' area under the curve estimates., Results:  Frailty, serum lactate > 2, and presentation to the ED > 12 hours after injury were significant predictors of SICU admission overall (P = 0.03, 0.038, and 0.05 respectively). Additionally, the predictive model for planned SICU admission had no common significant predictors with unplanned SICU admission. Planned SICU admission significant predictors included an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 15 and greater, a higher total serum protein, serum sodium <135, systolic blood pressure (BP) under 100, increased heart rate on admission to ED, thrombocytopenia (<120), and higher Anesthesia Society Association physical status classification (ASA) score (P = 0.007, 0.04, 0.05, 0.002, 0.041, 0.05, and 0.005 respectively). Each SICU prediction model (overall, planned, and unplanned) demonstrated sufficient discriminative ability with the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.869, 0.601, and 0.866 respectively. Finally, mean hospital Length of Stay (LOS) and mortality were increased in SICU admissions when compared to non-SICU admissions., Conclusion: Of the three risk factors predictive of SICU admission identified in this study, two have not been extensively studied previously in this patient population. Frailty has been associated with increased mortality and postoperative complications in hip fracture patients, but this is the first study to date to use a novel frailty index specifically designed and validated for use in hip fracture patients. The other risk factor, time from injury to presentation to the ED serves as an indicator for time a hip fracture patient spent without receiving medical attention. This risk factor has not been investigated heavily in the past as a predictor of SICU admissions in this patient population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Trejo et al.)