Search

Introduction: Cerebral swelling often occurs during craniotomy for cerebral tumors. Poor brain relaxation can increase the risk of cerebral ischemia, possibly worsening the outcome. The surgical team should identify any risk factors that could cause perioperative brain swelling and decide which therapies are indicated for improving it. The present investigation aimed to elucidate the risk factors associated with brain swelling during elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors., Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, observational study included 52 patients scheduled for elective supratentorial tumor surgery. The degree of brain relaxation was classified upon the opening of the dura according to a four-point scale (brain relaxation score: 1, perfectly relaxed; 2, satisfactorily relaxed; 3, firm brain; and 4, bulging brain). Moreover, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, arterial blood gas, and plasma osmolality were recorded after the removal of the bone flap., Results: This study showed that the use of preoperative dexamethasone was associated with a brain relaxation score of ≤2 (p = 0.005). The median midline shift of 6 (3-0) mm and median hemoglobin level of >13 g/dL were associated with a brain relaxation score of ≥3 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). The dosage of mannitol (0.25 g/kg   versus 0.5 g/kg), physical status, intraoperative position, tumor diameter and volume, peritumoral edema and mass effect, World Health Organization (WHO) grading, mean arterial pressure, PaCO 2 , osmolality, and core temperature were not identified as risk factors associated with poor relaxation., Conclusion: The use of preoperative dexamethasone was associated with improved brain relaxation, whereas the presence of a preoperative midline shift and a higher level of hemoglobin were associated with poor brain relaxation., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Pérez de Arriba et al.)

Introduction The use of orthopedic implants is a cause for concern for the release of its integrating metals and the systemic complications that may occur. Instrumented spine arthrodesis is the recommended treatment for many spine diseases. Different segmental fixation devices, commonly made of titanium and its alloys, are used in these surgeries. The use of this metal for spinal fusion has introduced the possibility of generating microscopic metal particles that are present in the tissues of the surrounding implants (peri-implant environment). In fact, metal debris has been found in the paraspinal soft tissues of patients with posterior lumbar instrumentation and showed to be particularly high in patients undergoing revision procedures of pseudoarthrosis. In addition, part of the metals might also dissolve (either from the released particles or directly from the implant surface) and circulate in the body fluids, accumulating (eventually) in remote organs. Material and methods A prospective study was designed with patients who were to be operated by the pathology of the lumbar spine to perform a vertebral arthrodesis composed of a titanium alloy (n=32). Two subgroups were differentiated according to the type of surgery performed: a) Posterolateral arthrodesis (N=5); b) Circumferential arthrodesis intervertebral implant of polyester-ether ketone (PEEK) (N=8) or titanium (N=19). The blood sample was taken before surgery and one year later. The samples were analyzed by mass spectrophotometry with a double focus inductive coupling plasma source (DF-ICP-MS). Results Blood titanium levels prior to surgery were similar to those in other publications (0.7449 micrograms per liter -1  (µgL -1 ), Standard Deviation (SD)=0.562). The average titanium concentration levels found after surgery was 2.5406 µgL -1  (SD=3,69), near 3.5-fold increase. After surgery, there was a significant mean increase in serum titanium levels of 1.7957 µgL -1  (SD=3.5765, Range=-0.57 µgL -1 ; 14.60 µgL -1 ). There is a statistically significant increment (p=0.00049) of the titanium concentration in the serum of the patients after surgery. If we analyze the patients in three groups according to the type of implants used (posterolateral, circumferential with PEEK, and circumferential with titanium), there are no differences between those who did not have an intersomatic device implanted and those in which PEEK implants were implanted, but with those in which it was titanium it was p=0.006 and p=0.018, respectively. Conclusions Patients undergoing vertebral instrumentation experience a significant increase in serum titanium levels compared to before surgery levels. The use of an intersomatic device did not show differences in titanium release with not using it when it was PEEK. There are significant differences between patients without intersomatic implants or those who had a PEEK implant with those in whom it was titanium, with a significant increase in blood titanium levels., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.