Search

A novel antibody–drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan is a combination of a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting antibody and DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor used to treat HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer. To determine its safety and efficacy in treating HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585), DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), and DESTINY-Breast04 (NCT03734029). We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan that were published before May 2023. The efficacy endpoints included median progressive-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), overall response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The safety endpoints included treatment-related adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. To ensure transparency, this study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website (CRD42023414170). Three RCTs involving 1689 patients were included. Compared with physician-recommended and conventional treatments, trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited statistically significant improvements in PFS, ORR, and CBR. The median OS and DOR failed to be combined; however, the analyzed studies showed that they were longer. The incidence of adverse events was generally higher with trastuzumab deruxtecan than with physician-recommended or conventional treatments. The results of this study suggest that trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective in treating HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer than physician-recommended or conventional treatments. However, trastuzumab deruxtecan-related adverse drug reactions should be closely monitored because of its higher incidence of adverse events. • HER2-targeted therapy is ineffective in locally advanced or metastatic disease. • Trastuzumab deruxtecan may improve function compared to traditional treatments. • We included 1689 breast cancer patients from three randomized clinical studies. • Verification of trastuzumab deruxtecan's efficacy and safety is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present review gives an overview of systematic reviews published in peer reviewed Journals analysing quality of reporting in oncology studies. PUBMED and Cochrane library were searched to identify systematic reviews assessing quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBS). Recommendations and primary endpoints used to assess the quality of reporting were described. Intrinsic quality of reporting was analyzed using an Overall Quality Score for literature Reviews (OQSR). Main evaluation themes were overall quality of reporting (20/58) and reporting of Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) in RCTs (7/58). Reporting recommendations used were not detailed in 56.9% of reviews. Insufficient reporting for the methodological description (randomization, blinding details, and allocation concealment) and the rationale for using specific measure of HRQOL were highlighted. OQSR was significantly higher for reviews published between 2010 and 2014 (after the PRISMA Publication), as compared to those published between 1996–2009 (median OQSR 10 (10–11) versus median OQSR 9 (6–10) respectively, p = 0.0053). Intrinsic quality of reporting is satisfactory and has been improved in the last years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improving quality of life is a key issue for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Lifestyle interventions could positively impact the quality of life of patients. However, there is no clear-cut understanding of the role of diet, exercise and risky behaviour reduction in improving the quality of life of men with PCa. The aim of this review was to systematically summarize randomized controlled trials on lifestyle in PCa patients with quality of life as main outcome. 17 trials were included. Most of them referred to exercise interventions (71%) and involved men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (47%). Exercise studies yielded the greater amount of positive results on quality of life outcomes (67%), followed by dietary interventions (50%) and combined lifestyle interventions (33%). In particular, supervised exercise programs with resistance training sessions were the ones producing greater convincing evidence for benefits on quality of life. Further studies with high methodological quality providing adequate information to develop evidence-based, personalized lifestyle interventions that can effectively ameliorate PCa-related quality of life are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Fatigue is a prevalent and disruptive symptom for many cancer survivors. • Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been tested to reduce fatigue in cancer. • Meta-analyses tested the efficacy of MBIs in cancer for fatigue and vigor/vitality. • MBIs significantly improved fatigue and vigor/vitality compared to controls. • Evidence grade was low due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, and publication bias. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to determine the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in improving fatigue-related outcomes in adult cancer survivors. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases and reference lists of included studies. Separate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for fatigue and vitality/vigor. Twenty-three studies reporting on 21 RCTs (N = 2239) met inclusion criteria. MBIs significantly reduced fatigue compared to controls at post-intervention (g = 0.60, 95 % CI [0.36, 0.83]) and first follow-up (g = 0.42, 95 % CI [0.20, 0.64]). Likewise, MBIs significantly improved vitality/vigor at post-intervention (g = 0.39, 95 % CI [0.25, 0.52]) and first follow-up (g = 0.35, 95 % CI [0.03, 0.67]). The evidence grade was low due to risk of bias, substantial heterogeneity, and publication bias among studies. MBIs show promise in improving fatigue and vitality/vigor in cancer survivors. More rigorous trials are needed to address current gaps in the evidence base. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]