Search

This paper examines the experiences of healthcare providers (n = 10), policymakers (n = 5), and drug users (n = 5) in Puerto Rico (PR) after Hurricane Maria hit in September 2017. We draw upon ecosocial theory and theories of coloniality to interpret the findings from semi-structured interviews conducted between 2018–2020. The data from the study reveal the unacknowledged absence of illicit drug use in public policies on emergency management in response to the catastrophe and its association with barriers in the provision of health care services (i.e. mental health, opioid agonist therapy, and harm reduction) for drug-using patients. These individuals have been largely invisible in policy discussions on healthcare post-Maria. Our analysis highlights three intersecting factors that should be addressed in post-disaster policymaking addressing substance users. First, changes in the government's medical plan one year after the Hurricane hampered the coordination of services for patients and providers. Therefore, the aid offered tended to be exclusively economic rather than addressing disparities in health service access. Second, policies have not addressed the mistreatment and prejudice toward substance users in hospital and emergency room settings. Third, there was evidence of relapses in the use of controlled substances and the replacement of routine drugs with fentanyl due to the interruption of regular transportation, affecting supplies and illegal substances. Failure to address addiction constitutes a real threat to the survival of a significant population in PR and embodies the historical oppression wrought by colonialism, discrimination, and stigma in a society that dismisses substance users in its public and budgetary policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prevention of chronic diseases happens within systems of action across whole communities. In local communities, organisations play important roles that influence health, but many are in non-health sectors where health or 'prevention' is not their main remit. In this paper, we explore how organisations in communities perceive their role as part of a local system of chronic disease prevention. We use interview data from 'Prevention Tracker', an investigation undertaken with Australian communities that aimed to describe how local prevention systems are organised. Four communities participated – one regional, one remote, and two urban. In each, local advisory groups identified key informants for semi-structured interviews (n = 80). We applied the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion as a sensitising framework to categorise responses; and undertook inductive thematic analysis to generate deeper insights into organisations' orientation to prevention. While some respondents clearly recognised and articulated linkages between their organisation's activities and prevention, sometimes drawing from health promotion principles to do so, many did not and were prompted by the interview to consider their contributions. A proportion explicitly distanced themselves from prevention despite their work directly addressing the social determinants that underscore health. For some, this distancing reflects a tactical decision to reduce competition and promote partnership between organisations, and to engage clients. This study demonstrates that diverse organisations make contributions to prevention – often outside of 'core business' – whether or not the organisations themselves realise, relate to and/or self-identify as playing this role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite significant engagement with new and emerging issues in public health practice, the public health literature has few theoretical explanations for how new practices emerge, take root, and become institutionalized. In this contribution, we utilize Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concepts of field, habitus and capital, and in-depth interviews with public health practitioners to document and describe the emerging field of public health adaptation to climate change Ontario, Canada. In doing so, we identify and explain three types of climate change action and associated practices – 'wait and see', repackaging existing actions and championing new actions – that practitioners relate to climate change adaptation in Ontario (i.e. business as usual, repackaging existing actions and championing climate new actions). We discuss the typology in relation to the dominant and emerging logics that practitioners ascribe to promoting practical action on this sub-field of environmental health practice to promote a discussion of how social change occurs within a well-established field of professional practice. Findings suggest, that change and innovation can result from exogenous shocks that force practitioners to adopt new practices (e.g. the increasing frequency and intensity of climate-related impacts on health), how the 'rules' of a given field are interpreted by practitioners and made actionable, and through the negotiation of new rules by practitioners with a 'radical habitus' who champion particular issues, albeit resulting in significant professional risk. We discuss these findings in relation to Bourdieu's theory, concluding there is significant room for practitioner agency to cultivate normative dispositions and influence the adoption of policy and practice-change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Public health professionals may be confronted with unique ethical challenges in outbreak response situations. We conducted interviews with twenty-two public health professionals involved in responses to the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone and Liberia to explore how they understood and experienced the ethical challenges involved in this work. The concerns covered in these interviews ranged dramatically, but three themes emerged as unique contributions from a subset of individuals integrally involved with the frontline response, who framed concerns about representation as key ethical issues. These included concerns regarding misrepresentations of West Africans as 'resistant' to the epidemic response, failures in material and information resources provided in the response, and representations of 'rationality' between responders and publics. Such concerns suggest that perspectives advanced in the critical public health literature in recent decades are circulating amongst public health professionals involved in outbreak response, although discord amongst respondents suggests the need for more deliberate efforts to reframe thinking about resistance, resources, and rationality in future public health outbreak responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]