Search

Purpose: To investigate the visual, refractive, and biomechanical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with two different cap thicknesses., Methods: Thirty-four patients were included in this prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study. Subjects were randomized to receive SMILE surgery with a 110-m cap thickness in one eye and 145-µm cap thickness in the fellow eye. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), total higherorder aberrations (THOAs) and corneal biomechanical properties were compared 3 months after surgery., Results: Postoperative refractive and visual outcomes, CS and THOAs were similar between the two groups ( P > 0.05 for all parameters). At 3 months postoperatively, there was a significant difference in Corvis ST Biomechanical Index (CBI); stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP A1), and Integrated Radius between the two groups (all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Eyes with thicker SMILE corneal caps showed no advantage regarding visual acuity, CS and THOAs over eyes with thinner caps. However, higher cap thickness may result in better corneal biomechanical properties postoperatively., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in first-degree relatives of patients with keratoconus (KCN) and compare with the normal population., Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 210 eyes from 105 family members of 28 patients with KCN and 210 normal eyes of 105 controls were enrolled. In each eye, corneal topography, tomography, and aberrometry were performed and compared between the 2 groups., Results: This study included 61 female (58.1%) and 44 male participants (41.9%) and 105 age-matched and sex-matched controls with normal topographic cornea. In 14 of 105 first-degree relatives (13.33%) of patients with KCN, KCN was diagnosed with a male preponderance (71.5% male, 28.5% female). Tomographic indices and irregularity indices in 3 and 5 mm zone in Orbscan were significantly higher in the relative group. In addition, other irregularity indices of TMS-4 topography including surface regularity index, surface asymmetry index, difference sector index, SDP, and irregular astigmatism index were significantly higher in family members of patients with KCN. The most prevalent topographic pattern in the control group was the symmetric bowtie (57.1%) and in the relative group was the asymmetric bowtie (39.5%). In addition, significantly thinnest corneal pachymetry was detected in the relative group. Root mean square of all HOAs including vertical trefoil, vertical coma, horizontal coma, horizontal trefoil, quadrifoil, and fourth-order spherical aberrations were significantly greater in the relative group than controls., Conclusions: Owing to the high prevalence of undiagnosed KCN susceptibility in family members with KCN, keratorefractive surgery should be considered cautiously in these individuals. In addition, comprehensive preoperative examination should be considered to detect subtle topographic and HOAs in these individuals., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare early corneal biomechanical changes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)., Methods: The study comprised 74 patients eligible for refractive surgery, equally allocated to PRK (37 patients) and SMILE (37 patients). Corneal biomechanical properties were recorded and compared between the 2 groups at preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using a dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera equipped with a noncontact tonometer., Results: Both procedures significantly affected corneal biomechanical properties at 3 months after surgery. Patients in the PRK group showed significantly better results for deformation amplitude ratio (DA ratio) ( P = 0.03), maximum inverse radius (InvRadMax) ( P = 0.02), and A2 time ( P = 0.03). The mean changes in DA ratio, HC radius, InvRadMax, and Ambrosio relational thickness were significantly higher in the SMILE group in comparison with those of the PRK group (all, P < 0.05). In both groups, change in CCT was significantly correlated with changes in DA ratio and InvRadMax ( P < 0.05)., Conclusionss: Both SMILE and PRK refractive surgeries significantly altered corneal biomechanical properties but the changes were more prominent after SMILE., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest. We warrant that this paper is original and has not been published in another journal., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)