Search

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to analyze the course of corneal densitometry (CD), endothelial cell density (ECD), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) 5 years after uneventful Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS Sixty uneventful cases (51 patients) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. CD of various corneal layers (anterior, central, posterior, and total layer) and zones (0-2 mm, 2-6 mm, and 6-10 mm) were measured with Scheimpflug tomography. ECD, BCVA, and CCT were also evaluated. RESULTS Total CD at 0 to 2 mm and 2 to 6 mm zones significantly decreased from 33 ± 10 and 27.8 ± 8 grayscale units (GSU) preoperatively to 21.8 ± 3.1 and 22.2 ± 4.2 GSU at 5 years, respectively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, total CD at the 6 to 10 mm zone significantly increased from 30 ± 8.3 GSU preoperatively to 34.6 ± 7.8 GSU at 5 years (P < 0.001). ECD significantly decreased from 2496 ± 267 cells/mm2 preoperatively to 1063 ± 470 cells/mm2 at 5 years (P < 0.001). Similarly, CCT significantly decreased from 686 ± 109 μm preoperatively to 557 ± 37 μm at 5 years (P < 0.001). Postoperative BCVA was significantly better after DMEK for every examination time point. CONCLUSIONS Despite a slight CD increase at all layers of all corneal zones from the second to the fifth postoperative year, the excellent visual outcome was maintained throughout 5-year follow-up. Thus, DMEK seems to effectively treat corneal endothelial disease in the long term.

Purpose To evaluate the short- and mid-term changes of corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP), corneal volume distribution (CVD), and corneal asphericity after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of myopia and astigmatism and compare the results with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Method Thirty eyes of 18 patients who underwent SMILE were compared with a group of 30 eyes of 16 patients who underwent FS-LASIK. The groups were matched for preoperative central corneal thickness and lenticule thickness/ablation depth. Scheimpflug corneal tomography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 months and 3 years. The CTSP was evaluated on 4 concentric rings (2, 4, 6, and 8 mm). The CVD was evaluated at 3 concentric zones (3, 5, and 7 mm). Changes in the anterior and posterior asphericity at a 6-mm zone were also evaluated. Results Between the 2-month and 3-year examination, the CTSP showed a similar increase for both groups at all measured points and rings (P ≥ 0.168). The CVD also showed a similar increase for both groups at all measured zones (P ≥ 0.278). The anterior corneal asphericity remained stable after SMILE (2-mo Q = 0.46 ± 0.27; 3-yr Q = 0.45 ± 0.27; P = 0.711) but decreased significantly after FS-LASIK (2-mo Q = 0.52 ± 0.47; 3-yr Q = 0.47 ± 0.44; P = 0.028). Similarly, the posterior corneal asphericity remained stable after SMILE (2-mo Q = -0.11 ± 0.15; 3-yr Q = -0.11 ± 0.13; P = 0.902) but decreased significantly after FS-LASIK (2-mo Q = -0.13 ± 0.14; 3-yr Q = -0.16 ± 0.15; P = 0.034). Conclusions CTSP and CVD between the 2-month and 3-year examination showed a similar increase after SMILE and FS-LASIK. During the postoperative course, the anterior and posterior corneal asphericity remained more stable after SMILE compared with FS-LASIK.

Purpose We present a challenging case of a 9-year-old patient with refractory neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) who was successfully treated with cenegermin eye drops. Methods A 7-year-old boy developed an ocular infection after a visit to a public swimming pool. After having been unsuccessfully treated for 2 years with antibiotics, steroids, and artificial tears, the patient presented to our clinic with a therapy-refractory NK. We initiated treatment with autologous serum eye drops that showed only weak response. Therefore, treatment with cenegermin eye drops was started. Results After cenegermin therapy, a complete restoration of the corneal surface and an increase in visual acuity were achieved. Conclusions The use of cenegermin is effective in treating pediatric NK.

PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term changes in anterior and posterior corneal irregular astigmatism and curvatures after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS Fifty eyes of 28 patients underwent SMILE for myopic astigmatism. All procedures were performed using the VisuMax® femtosecond laser. A Scheimpflug camera was used for preoperative and 3-year postoperative tomography. Anterior and posterior corneal Fourier parameters (spherical component, regular astigmatism, asymmetry, and irregularity) and curvature data were evaluated and compared within 2 subgroups according to the magnitude of the refractive correction (low myopia group: spherical equivalent (SEQ) ≥ -6 D; high myopia group: (SEQ) < -6 D). Associations between all studied parameters were examined. RESULTS Three years postoperatively, an increase in anterior corneal curvatures and Fourier parameters was detected and the results were strongly correlated with the preoperative SEQ, lenticule thickness, and volume. At the posterior cornea, the flattest radius, corneal astigmatism, spherical component, regular astigmatism, and irregularity decreased only in the high myopia group. A correlation was found between changes in posterior astigmatism and changes in anterior radii (R = 0.349, P = 0.014), SEQ (R = 0.396, P = 0.0049), and lenticule thickness (R = -0.414, P = 0.0031). Moreover, changes in posterior corneal irregularity correlated with the changes in anterior and posterior radii (R = -0.3, P = 0.034, and R = 0.449, P = 0.0012, respectively), changes in preoperative SEQ (R = 0.284, P = 0.0477), and lenticule thickness (R = -0.311, P = 0.0298). CONCLUSIONS Three years after SMILE, there was a reduction of posterior astigmatism in high refractive corrections. This could result in undercorrection in high refractive treatments. Total irregularities increased despite the compensatory effect of the posterior corneal surface.

To compare the course of Scheimpflug corneal densitometry (CD) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).Fifty-four DMEK and 25 DSAEK cases without previous corneal surgery, complicated intraoperative or postoperative course, or vision-limiting ocular comorbidities were included. Pseudophakic eyes of age-matched subjects were recruited as controls (n = 20). Scheimpflug CD of the optically relevant zones (0-2 and 2-6 mm), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, and central corneal thickness were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.CD of the optical zone decreased from 34.4 ± 9.4 grayscale units (GSU) before to 19.2 ± 2.7 GSU at 24 months after DMEK. Respectively, CD decreased from 34.0 ± 13.4 GSU before to 21.2 ± 2.5 GSU at 24 months after DSAEK. Mean central CD in group 3 was 18.1 ± 1.3 GSU. Compared with DSAEK, DMEK cases showed lower central CD at 3 and 6 months (P ≤ 0.012) but not at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. DSAEK showed higher CD values throughout the postoperative period compared with healthy controls (P0.001). DMEK showed higher CD compared with controls at 3, 6, and 12 but not at 24 months after surgery (P = 0.152). Postoperative BCVA was significantly better after DMEK for every examination time point. No difference in endothelial cell density was found between DMEK and DSAEK at any time point.DMEK showed lower CD and better BCVA compared with DSAEK in the first 6 postoperative months. Notably, although CD reached similar levels in the midterm after both DMEK and DSAEK, BCVA remained significantly better after DMEK.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of ultraviolet A radiation on retinal function and structure after the corneal collagen crosslinking procedure. METHODS In the present prospective, single-center cohort study 17 eyes of 17 patients who underwent collagen crosslinking (Dresden protocol) for the treatment of corneal ectasia were examined preoperatively and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively with multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography. The P1 amplitude density (P1-AD) of the central retinal response was documented in 5 concentric rings, with ring 1 (R1) representing the foveal response and rings 2 to 5 (R2-R5) corresponding to successive annuli of stimulation. Visual acuity, corneal densitometry at the 0 to 2 mm zone and at the 2 to 6 mm annulus, and macular thickness (MT; central, 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm zones) were recorded. RESULTS The preoperative values of P1-AD were R1 = 109.96 ± 28.96, R2 = 49.8 ± 14.46, R3 = 29.85 ± 8.9, R4 = 19.33 ± 6.3, and R5 = 16.39 ± 5.48 nV/deg. At 2 weeks, these values were R1 = 77.54 ± 24.47, R2 = 36.55 ± 12.53, R3 = 21.53 ± 7.71, R4 = 15.3 ± 6.13, and R5 = 13.32 ± 5.48, showing a significant reduction for R1-R4 (P ≤ 0.026). The 6-week P1-AD was R1 = 99.8 ± 31.23, R2 = 40.67 ± 16.39, R3 = 24.98 ± 7.13, R4 = 16.35 ± 4.84, and R5 = 13.76 ± 3.98, showing no significant differences compared with preoperative values (P ≥ 0.054). Corneal densitometry increased significantly at 2 weeks (P < 0.001) and remained increased at 6 weeks (P < 0.001), showing statistically insignificant correlations with 2-week P1-AD (P ≥ 0.553). The central MT increased (P = 0.787), whereas MT at 1 mm (P = 0.444), 3 mm (P = 0.039), and 5 mm (P < 0.001) zones decreased. CONCLUSIONS The return of P1-AD to preoperative (physiologic) values at 6 weeks confirms the safety standards of the duration and intensity of ultraviolet A radiation, as proposed by the Dresden protocol. However, temporary postoperative retinal dysfunction cannot be excluded.

PURPOSE Evaluation of spherical component (SC), regular astigmatism (RA), and irregular astigmatism (IA, ie, Asymmetry and Irregularities) 3 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and comparison to femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). METHODS Thirty-two eyes of 21 patients who underwent SMILE for myopia and astigmatism were compared with 32 eyes of 21 patients treated with FS-LASIK. Scheimpflug images were obtained preoperatively and 3 years postoperatively. Fourier analysis of keratometric-derived parameters (SC, RA, Asymmetry, and Irregularities) of the anterior, posterior, and total cornea were evaluated at 4 concentric rings (ring 1, 2 mm diameter; ring 2, 4 mm; ring 3, 6 mm; ring 4, 8 mm) and over the entire 8-mm zone. RESULTS After FS-LASIK, over the 8-mm zone, the RA and IA of the anterior cornea increased significantly (P ≤ 0.002), whereas SMILE induced an insignificant increase in RA and Asymmetry (P ≥ 0.276) and a decrease in Irregularities (P = 0.770). At the 8-mm zone of the posterior cornea, the Irregularities increased significantly (P = 0.027) after FS-LASIK, whereas SMILE induced no significant changes in the examined variables (P ≥ 0.347). RA and IA of the total cornea increased significantly after FS-LASIK (P ≤ 0.001), whereas SMILE induced an insignificant increase in RA and Asymmetry (P ≥ 0.092) and a significant decrease in Irregularities (P < 0.001). FS-LASIK induced a greater decrease in SC of the total cornea at ring 4 (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS FS-LASIK resulted in a greater increase in RA and Irregularities and greater flattening of the midperiphery of the anterior and total cornea compared with SMILE. The posterior cornea remained unaffected after SMILE, whereas more Irregularities were induced after FS-LASIK over the 8-mm zone.

PURPOSE To compare the rebubbling rate and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with 5% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas versus 100% air as a tamponade for graft attachment. METHODS Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series including 368 consecutive pseudophakic eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy that underwent DMEK in a tertiary referral center between October 2010 and August 2015 using either air (group 1, 191 eyes) or 5% SF6 (group 2, 177 eyes) as a tamponade. The rebubbling rate, complications, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, and endothelial cell density were analyzed before and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. RESULTS The rebubbling rate was 20.4% (39/191, group 1) versus 6.8% (12/177, group 2; P < 0.001). Complications included cystoid macular edema (n = 5, group 1, and n = 10, group 2; P = 0.14) and 1 case of presumed allograft rejection (n = 1, group 2). The follow-up period was 12 ± 8 months for group 1 and 6 ± 4 months for group 2. BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) had improved after 12 months from 1.43 ± 0.63 to 0.18 ± 0.26 (group 1, P < 0.001) and from 1.8 ± 0.63 to 0.18 ± 0.17 (group 2, P < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with BCVA ≥0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 12 months was 70.9% (90/127, group 1) and 78.4% (40/51, group 2; P = 0.3). Endothelial cell loss at 12 months after DMEK was 44 ± 18% (group 1) versus 33 ± 15% (group 2, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS The use of a tamponade with 5% SF6 yielded a significantly lower incidence of graft detachment requiring surgical reintervention with no detrimental effect on graft endothelial cells. Thus, routine use of 5% SF6 for a graft tamponade in DMEK is recommended.

PURPOSE To compare visual rehabilitation after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. METHODS The medical records of patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty were retrospectively evaluated. A DMEK (n = 25 eyes) and a DSAEK (n = 25 eyes) group were formed. Specific matched pairs consisting of 1 DMEK and 1 DSAEK eye with the same preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were built and compared with regard to visual rehabilitation, subjective refraction, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell density. RESULTS Preoperative median BSCVA (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was for both groups 0.7 (range, 0.2-1.70). At 12 months, median BSCVA was 0.0 (range, -0.08 to 0.7) after DMEK and 0.3 (range, 0.1-0.52) after DSAEK (P < 0.001). The spherical equivalent changed after DMEK from 0.0 D (range, -2.75 to 4.63 D) to 0.5 D (range, -1 to 2.5 D) and after DSAEK from -0.32 D (range, -2.50 to 1 D) to 0.63 D (range, -2.38 to 2 D). Central corneal thickness decreased from 718 μm (range, 566-1041 μm) to 533 μm (range, 460-605 μm) after DMEK and from 650 μm (range, 527-749 μm) to 605 μm (range, 486-650 μm) after DSAEK. Endothelial cell density decreased from 2448 cells/mm (range, 2106-3000 cells/mm) to 1263 cells/mm (range, 589-2282 cells/mm) after DMEK and from 2348 cells/mm (range, 2156-2781 cells/mm) to 1327 cells/mm (range, 664-1972 cells/mm) after DSAEK. CONCLUSIONS DMEK patients showed faster rehabilitation and higher BSCVA at all postoperative visits; however, the decline in graft's endothelial cell count and change in the spherical equivalent were similar for both procedures.

To compare the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) during corneal flap preparation in porcine eyes when using a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome.The present study was conducted at a university hospital and a private clinic.The vitreous IOP was directly measured with a cannula through the optic nerve in 24 porcine globes (n = 12 for each device). In the first procedure (worst-case procedure), the eye interface was lowered against the globe until abortion of the docking maneuver when using the IntraLase femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) or the suction ring was pressed very firmly against the globe when using the Amadeus microkeratome (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). In the second procedure (regular procedure), a normal lamellar flap creation was performed using each of these devices.During the worst-case procedure, a maximum IOP of 260 ± 53 mm Hg (mean ± SD) was reached with the IntraLase and 318 ± 59 mm Hg was reached with the Amadeus. During the regular procedure, the maximum IOP increased to 135 ± 16 mm Hg when using the IntraLase femtosecond laser and to 152 ± 24 mm Hg with the Amadeus microkeratome.In the worst-case procedure, the maximum IOP levels were lower in the IntraLase group. No significant difference in maximum IOP levels could be obtained during the regular procedure. The duration of the suction phase is longer when using the IntraLase femtosecond laser.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve of standardized "no-touch" Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) of a single surgeon in a clinic without an in-house eye bank facility. METHODS: For 25 eyes of 22 patients, Descemet graft preparation and DMEK surgery were performed according to the protocols of the Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery with minor modifications. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, subjective refraction, Scheimpflug tomography, and endothelial cell density of the donor tissue were documented before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery; intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: No donor tissue was lost owing to preparation failure of the Descemet graft allowing all surgeries to be completed as planned. At 6 months after the surgery, 83% of eyes reached ≥ 20/40 (≥ 0.5), 48% ≥ 20/28 (≥ 0.8), and 30% (7/23) ≥ 20/20 (≥ 1.0) (n = 23). The mean change in both spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder in the same interval was minimal (0.03 diopter). Mean donor endothelial cell density decreased from 2444 cells per square millimeter (± 198 cells/mm2) before the surgery to 1331 cells per square millimeter (± 491 cells/mm2) at 6 months after the surgery. Partial graft detachment requiring rebubbling occurred in 9 cases (36%). One eye developed primary graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: This case series shows that DMEK by a beginning surgeon can achieve good results without preparing the graft in an eye bank. Use of backup tissue can be avoided by strictly adhering to the Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery techniques and by harvesting the graft the day before surgery to avoid last-minute cancellation.

During donor tissue preparation for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), either microkeratome or femtosecond laser can be used for intrastromal cutting. We compared morphological and functional outcomes after DSAEK using both cutting techniques.In this retrospective study, 22 uneventful DSAEK surgeries were reviewed. Eight donor corneas were prepared for DSAEK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Fourteen corneas were processed using an Amadeus II microkeratome (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). The postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was measured. Furthermore, corneal optical coherence tomography scans (RTVue; Optovue, Fremont, CA) were conducted and analyzed for graft cornea thickness and posterior surface irregularities using regression analysis (SPSS; IBM, Chicago, IL) on a second-order polynomial curve as a model for the posterior surface.The graft thickness was 166.3 ± 58.2 μm (mean ± SD) in the femtosecond laser group and 172.7 ± 48.2 μm in the microkeratome group. The best-corrected visual acuity of 0.48 ± 0.20 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) in the femtosecond laser group was significantly poorer when compared with 0.33 ± 0.11 in the microkeratome group (P = 0.038). Moreover, the root mean square error between the posterior corneal surface and an ideal parabola surface was significantly higher in the femtosecond laser group (9.9 ± 2.2 μm) than in the microkeratome group (5.7 ± 2.2 μm; P0.001).Our study underlines the current superiority of a microkeratome-assisted preparation of the stromal-endothelial lamella before DSAEK surgery compared with the curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted processing.

Objective: To determine the intrastromal layer of corneal deposits in granular corneal dystrophy (GCD). Design: Investigative case report. Methods: A 32-year-old woman with bilateral decreased vision because of corneal deposits was examined with cross-sectional scans using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results: Visual acuity was 20/100 OU. Multiple confluent gray-white patches with an irregular shape were seen in the corneal stroma, leading to a diffuse opacification. OCT disclosed multiple hyperreflective dots in the anterior and deeper stromal layers. Conclusion: When severe corneal opacities obscure the clinical differentiation between anterior and deep infiltrates, OCT may determine the layers of the accumulation and select an appropriate surgical procedure.

Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPD) is a rare bilateral, autosomal-dominant disease. The presence of the epitheliumlike endothelium and the thickening of Descemet's membrane by the posterior collagenous layer (PCL) has been reported in the majority of published cases. Reepithelialization of the posterior cornea in donor tissue has been reported only once. Therefore, to examine this process we examined, by light and electron microscopy, three corneal buttons (an original and two subsequent keratoplasties after 3 and 4 years, respectively) from the left eye of a patient with bilateral disease. Our study showed a repopulation of the posterior surface of the donor corneas by the host epitheliumlike endothelium, which was of identical morphology in each case. In contrast to the previously published work, a posterior collagenous layer in the failed grafts was absent from the axial cornea, where the epitheliumlike endothelium was in direct contact with donor Descemet's membrane. A PCL at the periphery in the failed transplants was of the fibrocellular type and differed from the fibrillar PCL in the first keratoplasty specimen. The fibroblastlike cells within the fibrocellular PCL were distinct from the underlying epithelial-like cells and contained numerous tertiary phagolysosomes. We suggest that the major contributor to the fibrocellular PCL in the repeat keratoplasties was a fibrous ingrowth from the host/graft junction and not the epitheliumlike endothelium. It appears that the synthetic capacity of the epitheliumlike endothelium was similar to that of the normal epithelium and was much lower than that of normal native endothelium.