Search

To describe the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and visual outcomes in eyes with previous penetrating glaucoma surgery undergoing Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).A retrospective review of the first 227 cases of DSEK performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Data were collected regarding the performance of concurrent ocular procedures, intraoperative complications, postoperative visual outcomes, and postoperative complications, including primary graft failure, donor dislocation, endothelial rejection, and intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation.Fifty-six of the 227 DSEK procedures were performed in 52 eyes with previous trabeculectomy and/or tube shunt implantation. The percentage of procedures performed in eyes with and without a history of penetrating glaucoma surgery that resulted in primary graft failure (5.4% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.71) and donor dislocation (12.5% vs. 15.2%; P = 0.83) were not statistically significantly different. Additionally, the endothelial rejection rate was not significantly different between cases performed in eyes with (1/19.2 eye-years) and without (1/20.1 eye-years) a history of glaucoma surgery (P = 0.99). The incidence of elevated IOP (≥ 25 mm Hg) after DSEK was the highest in eyes with medically controlled glaucoma (47.4%), followed by eyes without a history of glaucoma (18.3%), and was the lowest in eyes with previous glaucoma surgery (11.5%). Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was improved over the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity in 81%, 95%, and 88% of eyes with previous glaucoma surgery, medically controlled glaucoma, and no glaucoma, respectively.DSEK is an effective procedure to improve vision in the majority of eyes with advanced glaucoma after trabeculectomy and/or tube shunt implantation. The incidence of postoperative complications, such as donor dislocation, primary graft failure, and endothelial rejection, is not significantly higher in eyes with a history of glaucoma surgery before DSEK. Because almost 50% of eyes with medically controlled glaucoma before DSEK experienced IOP elevation after surgery, careful monitoring of the IOP after DSEK is especially important in this patient population.

PURPOSE To describe the variations in intraoperative technique, postoperative complications, and visual outcomes associated with Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) after Ophtec iris reconstruction lens implantation. DESIGN Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent DSEK after Ophtec 311 iris reconstruction lens implantation at the Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles. METHODS Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, ophthalmic history, DSEK surgical technique, and postoperative clinical course. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraoperative and postoperative complications and visual outcomes. RESULTS Four patients were identified (1 man and 3 women, age: 43-78). Three of the eyes had undergone prior penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), and each of the eyes had a history of glaucoma, with previous glaucoma surgery having been performed in 2 of the eyes. No intraoperative complications were encountered during the procedures, although an unplanned anterior vitrectomy was required in a previously vitrectomized eye. In each case, a complete air fill of the globe was obtained to ensure adherence of the donor button, and in 3 of the 4 cases, the donor button was sutured to the recipient cornea to prevent potential posterior dislocation. None of the cases developed donor button dislocation or primary graft failure. Corrected distance visual acuities improved to 20/40-20/160, corresponding to a mean improvement of 0.25 (range, 0.12-0.40), limited by irregular corneal astigmatism and advanced glaucomatous optic neuropathy. During a mean follow-up period of 15.6 months (range, 4.9-24.8 months), graft rejection developed in 2 of the 3 eyes with a history of endothelial rejection after PKP (0.42 episode per eye-year). Both of these eyes developed secondary graft failure, which also developed 14 months after DSEK in the other eye with a history of PKP failure before DSEK. CONCLUSIONS DSEK can be successfully performed in eyes with partial or complete aniridia, such as those after Ophtec iris reconstruction lens implantation. Modifications to the standard DSEK technique increase the probability of successful donor adherence and decrease the risk of posterior dislocation of the donor corneal button. However, endothelial rejection may occur at an increased frequency, resulting in secondary graft failure.