Search

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality worldwide, whose burden is expected to increase in the next decades, because of numerous risk factors, including the aging of the population. COPD is both preventable and treatable by an effective management including risk factor reduction, prevention, assessment, and treatment of acute exacerbations and co-morbidities. The available agents approved for COPD treatment are long-acting or ultra-long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) bronchodilators, as well as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with LABAs. ICS use has been restricted only to selected COPD patients by the most recent documents, mainly based on the risk of exacerbations. However, several observational studies showed a high rate of prescription of ICS in COPD, irrespective of clinical recommendations, questioning the efficacy of these compounds in unselected patients with COPD and leading to possible increase risk of side effects related to ICS use. After examining the low levels of adherence in primary care and in the clinical settings to national and international recommendations for the treatment of COPD in different countries, the most common drivers of the prevailing use of ICS are critically reviewed here by examining their pros and cons, aimed at identifying evidence-based drivers for a proper selection of patients who may benefit from the proper use of ICS. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder characterized by reduced serum levels of alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) and increased risk for developing both early-onset lung emphysema and chronic liver disease. Laboratory diagnosis of AATD is not just a matter of degree, although the AAT serum level is the most important determinant for risk of lung damage. While being a single-gene disease, the clinical phenotype of AATD is heterogeneous. The current standard of care for patients affected by AATD-associated pulmonary emphysema is replacement therapy with weekly i.v. infusions of pooled human purified plasma AAT. Although no treatment for liver disease caused by deposition of abnormal AAT in hepatocytes is available, innovative treatments for this condition are on the horizon. This article aims to provide a critical review of the methodological steps that have marked progress in the detection of indicators described in the literature as being “clinically significant” biomarkers of the disease. The development and routine use of specific biomarkers would help both in identifying which patients and when they are eligible for treatment as well as providing additional parameters for monitoring the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]