Search

Simulating cross-shore sediment transport and associated sandbar migration is still a challenging task for phase-averaged coastal morphological models. Numerical studies have mostly relied on beach morphology prediction for calibration and validation, without examining in much detail the underlying hydrodynamics, sediment concentrations and transport rates. This paper reports on a new three-dimensional coastal morphodynamic model based on the hydrodynamic model of Zheng et al. (2017), combined with an advection-diffusion type suspended sediment transport model and the extended SANTOSS near-bed sediment transport formula of Van der A et al. (2013), to represent the key cross-shore transport mechanisms. The model is are calibrated based on comprehensive measurements from a large-scale laboratory experiment involving regular plunging breaking waves over an evolving sandbar, covering detailed comparisons on hydrodynamics, sediment suspension, transport rates, and bed level evolution. Separate validation using large scale wave flume experiments were also conducted to confirm the model's performance on different conditions. Good agreements are obtained between measurements and model results, which demonstrates the model's ability to reproduce cross-shore sediment transport processes under breaking waves correctly, given that the appropriate parameterizations for intra-wave processes are included. Model results also reveal the onshore near-bed transport is related to wave-induced near-bed streaming, wave skewness and asymmetry, and bed slope effects at different locations across the beach surface. Wave breaking-induced turbulence enhances the near-bed transport within the bed boundary layer which needs to be taken into account in order to achieve good model prediction skills. • A new phase-averaged morphodynamic model is developed to represent cross-shore sediment transport and beach morphology. • The model is calibrated based on comprehensive measurements to ensure good representation of all physical processes. • Model validation demonstrate the effectiveness of the model parameters for the related sediment transport processes. • Wave asymmetry and breaking turbulence to the near bed sediment onshore transport and resuspension is very important. • Detailed modelling of near bed process to include breaking turbulence to the sediment transport predictions is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long-distance transport of Yellow River sediments has formed an omega-shaped ('Ω') distal muddy deposit in the Yellow Sea. Numerous studies have investigated the sediment dynamics and sedimentary evolution of the deposit, but several key questions remain unanswered due to insufficient observations. To reveal the mechanisms of sediment dynamics and quantify sediment transport and deposition processes, this study collected field datasets in the depocenter of the muddy deposit off the Shandong Peninsula. Bottom mounted tripods were deployed from August 18 to 27, 2017, and from February 23 to March 2, 2018, during which two strong wind events with speeds of over 10.8 m/s occurred. The results showed that near-bed suspended sediment concentration responded directly to varying hydrodynamic conditions, and significant differences in suspended sediment concentration between two wind events could be ascribed to a number of factors (e.g., tidal current, wave periods, wind stress, turbulence). The harmonic analysis demonstrated that suspended sediment variations during the spring tide were directed mainly by resuspension, while resuspension and advection contributed equally at neap tide. The variations in background suspended sediment concentration can be ascribed to the residual current. Furthermore, the sediment transport pattern is similar to the pattern of water circulation. Generally, the along-shore suspended sediment flux is about one order of magnitude higher than the cross-shore flux. In summer, the suspended sediment was transported mainly downcoast. In winter, sediment was transported downcoast during wavy periods and upcoast during calm periods. Advection dominated sediment flux in most cases, except during wavy periods when local resuspension increased significantly, and the contribution of resuspension term to along-shore flux was up to 87%. Meanwhile, cross-shore flux also increased significantly under strong winds, which was simultaneously modulated by downcoast and offshore winds. After statistical analysis, we found that offshore winds controlled the cross-shore sediment transport in winter. Using parameterized calculation and statistical analysis, the average accumulation rate of the study site was estimated to be 0.6 cm/yr. During calm periods, lower background sediment concentration in summer led to lower deposition rates than in winter. In addition, the frequent strong wind events in winter cause extremely high erosion rates. This study provides new perspectives on quantitative variations in suspended sediment transport and regional erosion/deposition from synoptic to seasonal variations in the distal mud deposit. • In-situ observations at the bottom boundary layer were conducted in summer and winter on the muddy deposit off the Shandong Peninsula. • The advection dominates sediment flux in most cases, except for during wind gusts when local resuspension increases significantly. • Combining parameterized method and observational data, the accumulation rate is estimated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Net wave-induced sheet-flow sediment transport rate, Q net , can be produced by two co-existing effects: nonlinear waveshape and wave propagation, which alter the intra-wave boundary layer flow and sediment concentration. A intriguing question is whether the two effects can be simply added (the additivity hypothesis). This paper addresses this question based on simulations of a one-phase numerical model for sheet-flow sediment transport and examinations of the governing equations for boundary layer flow and sediment concentration. The additivity for the mean velocity (or streaming) is first demonstrated under typical field conditions. The main reason is that the two driving forces, i.e., momentum transfer produced by wave propagation and intra-wave asymmetry of flow turbulence produced by nonlinear waveshape, do not affect each other. The net sediment flux is separated into wave- and current-related components. Since the mean concentration profile is determined by the first-order process, the 'current'-related flux produced by the two effects, following the mean velocity, can be superimposed. After examining the leading Fourier components, the wave-related flux is also found to follow the additivity hypothesis. The findings are confirmed by numerical experiments. The implication of this work is that a practical formula for Q net can be designed with two separate components for nonlinear-waveshape and wave-propagation effects. • Simulations were conducted to study the effects of wave propagation and nonlinear waveshape on net sheet-flow transport rate. • The boundary layer streaming due to the two effects can be simply added. • The two effects produce net transport rates without much mutual interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]