Search

Purpose: In Singapore, optometrists' roles are limited compared to their counterparts elsewhere. The purpose of the survey is to investigate optometrists' current roles, views on extended roles, self-reported primary eye care knowledge, needs for continuing professional education (CPE) and views on suitable modes for CPE.Methods: Members of the Optometrist and Optician Board (OOB) were invited via email to take part in an anonymous online survey. The survey questions covered the following areas: current scope of practice, self-rated primary eye care knowledge, confidence in screening, co-managing minor eye conditions, CPE and referral behavior.Results: A total of 230 optometrists completed the survey (response rate 30%). Their current roles were limited to diagnostic refraction (92%), colour vision assessment (65%), contact lens fitting and dispensing (62%) amongst others. The average self-rated score for primary eye care knowledge was 8.2 ± 1.4; score range 1-10 (1-Very poor, 10-Excellent). Self-rated confidence scores for screening for cataract, diabetic retinopathy, chronic glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration were 2.7 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.9, 4.0 ± 1.9 and 3.8 ± 1.8, respectively. 71% of the optometrists felt that they should undertake regular CPE to improve their primary eye care knowledge. Blended learning (eLearning and traditional face-to-face lectures) (46.1%) was the most preferred mode for CPE delivery.Conclusion: Optometrists in Singapore represent a skilled underutilized primary eye care provider. Though their self-reported primary eye care knowledge is high, their confidence in screening and co-managing chronic eye conditions is low. Enabling them for extended primary eye care role would require further training.Significance: Singapore ageing population has led to greater eye care demands. Task-shifting from ophthalmologists to optometrists has been proposed in the literature to handle this growing care demands. At this juncture, this study provides evidence based answers to issues revolving around optometrists' readiness for a role expansion in Singapore. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Compliance with practitioner recommended lens care guidelines was assessed and compared in two test groups: patients belonging to a subscription membership group and a nonaffiliated group of 2-week frequent replacement (2WFR) soft contact lens wearers.Methods: Wearers (143 members and 149 nonmembers), whose clinical records were available for 18-24 months from September 2010 to August 2012, were queried by a written questionnaire: (1) source of lens purchase; (2) "rub" or "no-rub" care solution; (3) replacement interval of lens care products; (4) lens cleaning method; (5) noncompliant behaviors; and (6) replacement frequency of lens storage cases.Results: The questionnaires were completed by 104 members and 100 nonmembers. Of member group wearers, 63.0% correctly recognized the types of lens care products used ("rub', "no-rub") vs. 77.4% of nonmembers. Of member wearers, 82.2% used "rub" and rubbed each time vs. 76.3% of nonmembers. The replacement interval for care products was 26.2% (members) and 27.6% (nonmembers) for 1 month or less, while replacement frequency of storage cases was 22.3% and 19.2% for 1 month or less in each group respectively. There were no significant differences observed between each of these group comparisons (p>0.05, Fisher exact test).Conclusions: Compliance with practitioner recommended lens care regimens was equally poor in both test groups. Subscription membership of CLs which does not provide lens care products is not accompanied by an increase in compliance with lens care practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]