Search

We give a classification of torsion classes (or nullity classes) in an abelian category by forming a spectrum of equivalence classes of premonoform objects. This is parallel to Kanda's classification of Serre subcategories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using the nice properties of thew-divisible weight and thew-divisible groups, we prove a factorization theorem for compact abelian groupsK; namely,K = Ktor × Kd, whereKtoris a bounded torsion compact abelian group andKdis aw-divisible compact abelian group. By Pontryagin duality this result is equivalent to the same factorization for discrete abelian groups proved in [9]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the second part of the paper with the same title published inCommunications in Algebrain 2011. It contains applications of the Latticial Osofsky–Smith Theorem to Grothendieck categories and module categories equipped with a torsion theory. Various many different meanings spread in the literature of the relative concepts with respect to a hereditary torsion theory τ on Mod-Rlike τ-essential submodule, τ-complement submodule, τ-CS module, etc. are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

We consider the concept of prime submodule defined by Raggi et al. [7]. We find equivalent conditions for a module M progenerator in σ[M], with τ M -Gabriel dimension, to have a one-to-one correspondence between the set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable τ-torsion free injective modules in σ[M] and the set of τ-pure submodules prime in M, where τ is a hereditary torsion theory in σ[M]. Also we give a relation between the concept of prime M-ideal given by Beachy and the concept of prime submodule in M. We obtain that if M is progenerator in σ[M], then these concepts are equivalent. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Let R be a right perfect ring, and let (ℱ, 𝒞) be a cotorsion theory in the category of right R-modules ℳ R . In this article, it is shown that every right R-module has a superfluous ℱ-cover if and only if there exists a torsion theory (𝒜, ℬ) such that (ℱ, 𝒞) is cogenerated by ℬ. It is also proved that if (𝒜, ℬ) is a cosplitting torsion theory, then (⊥ℬ, (⊥ℬ)⊥) is a hereditary and complete cotorsion theory, and if (𝒜, ℬ) is a centrally splitting torsion theory, then (⊥ℬ, (⊥ℬ)⊥) is a hereditary and perfect cotorsion theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We define and study the symmetric version of differential torsion theories. We prove that the symmetric versions of some of the existing results on derivations on right modules of quotients hold for derivations on symmetric modules of quotients. In particular, we prove that the symmetric Lambek, Goldie, and perfect torsion theories are differential. We also study conditions under which a derivation on a right or symmetric module of quotients extends to a right or symmetric module of quotients with respect to a larger torsion theory. Using these results, we study extensions of ring derivations to maximal, total, and perfect right and symmetric rings of quotients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We show that if A is a representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebra, then every P• ∈ Kb(&Pscr;A) with HomK(Mod-A)(P•,P•[i]) = 0 for i ≠ 0 and add(P•) = add(νP•) is a direct summand of a tilting complex, and that if A, B are derived equivalent representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebras, then there exists a sequence of selfinjective Artin algebras A = B0, B1,.., Bm = B such that, for any 0 ≤ i < m, Bi+1 is the endomorphism algebra of a tilting complex for Bi of length ≤ 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Let R and S be two rings. Each category equivalence between a torsion class of left (right) R-modules and a torsion-free class of left (right) S-modules is represented by a left (right) quasitilting triple. Suppose we have a pair of equivalences T &rlarr;Y and X &rlarr; F between the torsion class T of R-modules and the torsion-free class Y of S-modules and between the torsion class X of S-modules and the torsion-free class F of R-modules. Denote by (R, V, S) and (S, U, R) the quasi-tilting triples representing these equivalences. We say that (R, V, S) and (S, U, R) are complementary if (T, F) and (X, Y) are torsion theories in R-Mod and S-Mod, respectively. We find necessary and sufficient conditions on the bimodules [SUBR]V[SUBS] and [SUBS]U[SUBR] to have the complementarity of (R, V, S) and (S, U, R). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]