Search

Aim: The significance of lymphadenectomy and its indications in patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) of anorectal adenocarcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of inguinal lymphadenectomy for ILNM., Method: This study included patients who underwent surgical resection for ILNM of rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with pathologically positive metastases between 1997 and 2011 at 20 participating centres in the Study Group for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer organized by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analysed., Results: In total, 107 patients were included. The primary tumour was in the rectum in 57 patients (53.3%) and in the anal canal in 50 (46.7%). The median number of ILNMs was 2.34. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in five patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 38.8%. Multivariate analysis identified undifferentiated histological type (P < 0.001), pathological venous invasion (P = 0.01) and pathological primary tumour depth T0-2 (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival., Conclusion: The 5-year overall survival after inguinal lymph node dissection was acceptable, and it warrants consideration in more patients. Further larger-scale studies are needed in order to clarify the surgical indications., (© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Squamous cell carcinomas of the anus are normally treated with synchronous chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Small, localized anal margin tumours may be adequately treated by local excision (LE) alone. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of patients with anal margin tumours treated with LE alone, reserving the use of CRT for salvage on local recurrence (LR)., Methods: Patients with small, localized (stage I/IIA) anal margin tumours treated by LE from October 1999 to September 2018 were identified. The effect of tumour size and resection margin on LR risk was analysed. Outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival were measured., Results: Fifty-five patients with anal margin tumours were identified. Overall 5-year LR, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 8%, 86% and 82% respectively. Of the seven LRs, five were successfully salvaged with CRT with no further recurrence and two were not fit for CRT. Resection margins in non-fragmented tumours and tumour size did not significantly influence LR risk., Conclusions: Most small, localized anal margin tumours can be adequately treated by LE alone with low LR rates. Most patients who developed LR were salvaged using CRT, with no cancer-related deaths reported., (© 2023 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Approximately 25% of anal cancer patients undergo abdominoperineal excision or more extensive surgery. Following surgery, a high perineal complication rate has been reported. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal interventional programme introduced to mitigate the risk of complications. This study aims to describe perineal healing in relation to ERAS compliance, type of resection and method of perineal reconstruction in patients with anal cancer after salvage surgery., Method: This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing abdominal surgery for squamous cell anal cancer in Stockholm between January 2005 and December 2015. Data collection was from registers supplemented by chart review. All patients were followed until death or 1 year after surgery. The associations between ERAS compliance, patient and treatment characteristics and perineal wound healing were evaluated using logistic regression., Results: In total, 101 patients (67 women) were included, of whom 72 were ERAS compliant. Of patients alive, healing after surgery occurred in 61/98 and 84/89 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Perineal healing at 3 months was statistically significantly associated with younger age and type of perineal reconstruction (in favour of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap). No associations were observed at 1 year but almost all wounds were healed., Conclusion: Age and type of perineal reconstruction appear to be significantly associated with improved healing at 3 months whereas compliance to an ERAS protocol and type of resection do not. Nearly all patients had a fully healed perineal wound 1 year after surgery for anal cancer., (© 2020 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: There is a paucity of data on outcomes from local excision (LE) of early anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCCs). This study aimed to assess survival outcomes according to tumour location, perianal (PAT) or anal canal (ACT), and to determine factors associated with R1 excision and outcomes according to T-category., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with early ASCC treated by LE from 2007 to 2019. Data were collected on baseline demographics, tumour location, staging, excision histology, adjuvant treatment, site and timing of recurrence. The main outcome measures were R1 resection, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival and overall survival., Results: Of 367 patients treated for ASCC, 39 (10.6%) patients with complete follow-up data underwent LE: 15 ACTs and 24 PATs. R1 resections were obtained in 27 patients (69.2%) and occurred more frequently in ACTs than PATs (93.3% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.006). Eighteen of 27 patients (66.7%) received adjuvant therapy (chemoradiotherapy [n = 11], radiotherapy alone [n = 7]) for R1 excision or re-excision, following which LRR developed in one of 10 (10.0%) patients in the ACT cohort and one of eight (12.5%) patients in the PAT cohort. There was no difference in 5-year LRR-free survival (82.0% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.252), disease-free survival (58.2% vs. 78.4%, P = 0.200) or overall survival (86.2% vs. 95.7%, P = 0.607) between the ACT and PAT cohorts., Conclusions: LE is a feasible treatment option for early ASCCs of the perianal margin but not the anal canal. Acceptable long-term outcomes can still be achieved with adjuvant therapy in the presence of a positive margin. Larger prospective studies to assess LE as a treatment strategy, such as the ACT3 trial, are warranted., (© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: As the understanding of anal dysplasia continues to develop, controversy remains regarding treatment of these lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion type (flat vs exophytic) and the association between morphology and dysplasia., Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected pathological database of patients > 17 years old who underwent operative excision/biopsies for presumed anal condyloma or dysplasia from 2009 to 2018. The analysis includes comparisons between patient factors, phenotype and grade of dysplasia., Results: Sixty-nine patients had 423 lesions. The mean age of the study population was 48.2 years. 62.3% were men and 46.4% of patients were black. 47.8% of patients were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and 39.1% were men who have sex with men (MSM). There were 176 (41.6%) flat lesions and 234 (55.3%) exophytic lesions. Exophytic lesions were 2.5-fold more likely to be associated with a higher grade of dysplasia than flat lesions (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.09-6.32). Neither lesion type nor dysplasia severity was associated with human papillomavirus, lesion location or patient characteristics, including race, MSM or HIV status., Discussion: Exophytic lesions were more than twice as likely to have advanced dysplasia compared with flat lesions. A clearer understanding of the association between gross lesion appearance and dysplasia will allow more appropriate counselling of patients and the development of better screening and treatment guidelines for anal condylomata and dysplasia., (Colorectal Disease © 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: This report summarizes the early experience of implementing elective colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: A pathway to minimize the risk of including COVID-19-positive patients for elective surgery was established. Prioritization and additional safety measures were introduced into clinical practice. Minimal invasive surgery was used where appropriate., Results: Thirty-eight patients were prioritized, and 23 patients underwent surgery (eight colon, 14 rectal and one anal cancer). The minimal invasive surgery rate was 78%. There were no major postoperative complications or patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Histopathological outcomes were similar to normal practice., Conclusion: A safe pathway to offer standard high-quality surgery to colorectal cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is feasible., (© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: A variety of tissue flaps have been described for the closure of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APE) or exenteration for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer and salvage surgery for anal cancer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMFs) as a reconstruction option in these patients. This is of particular benefit when using a laparoscopic approach for the abdominal component of the operation, avoiding disruption of the abdominal wall and risk of herniation with other reconstruction options, e.g. vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps., Method: This is a retrospective single centre case series of patients who underwent reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMFs using a novel weave technique, from January 2008 to August 2017., Results: There were 25 patients (16 female), with a median follow-up of 19 months (3-102). The indications for BPGMFs were cancer resection (21) and perineal hernia (4). The median length of stay was 14 days (6-60). All-cause mortality was 36% within the follow-up period. A healed perineal wound was achieved in 72% of patients within 30 days (84% of patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The overall donor site complication rate was 20% (including infection, dehiscence, numbness, haematoma and seroma) and 28% for the perineal site (including infection, dehiscence and prolapse)., Conclusions: BPGMFs provide an important option for reconstruction of the perineum particularly with a minimally invasive approach or with two stomas., (© 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Up to 30% of patients with squamous cell cancer of the anus (SCCA) will require a salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) for either persistent or recurrent disease. The objective of this study was to assess cancer-related outcomes in patients with (i) persistent or (ii) recurrent SCCA., Method: Embase and MEDLINE were searched. Publications were included if they assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence or metastatic disease after salvage APR for persistent or recurrent SCCA., Results: A total of 28 retrospective case series (study size ranged from nine to 111) met our inclusion criteria. The median time to salvage APR was 2.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.6-5.0 months, six studies] for persistent disease and 27.6 months (IQR 15.0-32.7 months, five studies) for recurrent disease. The median 5-year OS from the time of salvage APR was 45.0% (IQR 32.0%-52.3%, 10 studies) for persistent disease and 51.0% (IQR 36.0%-60.9%, 11 studies) for recurrent disease. The median 5-year DFS following salvage APR was 44.0% (IQR 29.5%-53.0%, 10 studies) for all patients. Following salvage APR, the median locoregional recurrence rate was 23.5% (IQR 15.8%- 46.9%, 19 studies) and 9.0% (IQR 6.4%-13.3%, 16 studies) of patients developed metastatic disease after salvage APR., Conclusion: Our review characterizes the best evidence for outcomes following salvage APR for patients with persistent or recurrent SCCA. The evidence is limited by the quality of included studies, as many were single centre case series., (Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Chemoradiotherapy remains the first line of treatment for anal cancer with surgery reserved for cancer recurrence or persistence. The low incidence of anal cancer means that the numbers undergoing surgery is small with centralization for excision to regional cancer centres. We present our experience of abdominal perineal excision, with reconstruction of the perineal defect (APERR), within a tertiary centre., Method: Over a 15-year period, data were collected retrospectively from notes of patients who underwent an APERR. The aim was to look at disease-free and overall survival and complications associated with flap reconstruction., Results: In the study period, 29 patients [median age = 62 (range: 42-81; interquartile range: 54-68) years] underwent APERR. Median follow-up was 77 (4-200) months. Thirteen patients died during follow-up; eight from their disease, with a median survival time of 16 (4-63) months. Five-year survival was 67%. Nine (31%) patients had recurrence during the follow up period; this was local (n = 2), regional (n = 4), distant (n = 2) or a combination (n = 1). Sixteen (55%) patients developed 24 complications, including nine (31%) flap complications and 10 (34%) parastomal hernias. Flap complications were flap failure (n = 1) requiring direct closure, flap dehiscence (n = 2), necrosis of flap tip (n = 1), wound infection (n = 4) and a bulky flap (n = 1) requiring liposuction., Conclusion: APERR of anal cancer is a feasible technique with excellent oncological treatment and acceptable long-term complications, although a higher than expected rate of parastomal hernia was noted., (Colorectal Disease © 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Primary anorectal melanoma is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis due to early distant metastasis. The prognostic value of positive loco-regional lymph nodes and the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival are unclear. We have investigated this by analysis of data obtained from a national representative database, controlling for potential confounders., Methods: Data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multiple imputation analysis was performed to deal with missing data. Cox regression models were formulated using different prognostic factors including site of origin, gender, size, race, rate of lymph node metastasis (ratio between positive lymph node count and total lymph nodes harvested), extent of lymphadenectomy (none, level I etc.), age, type of surgery, stage of disease and administration of radiotherapy., Results: Our population was composed of 208 patients who underwent surgery between 1998 and 2012. Rate of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.027; hazard ratio 1.873, 95% CI 1.076-3.261) and race (P = 0.019; hazard ratio 2.291, 95% CI 1.148-4.575) were found to be independent predictors of survival., Conclusion: Based on the data retrieved from the SEER database, metastasis to loco-regional lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor, but lymphadenectomy does not improve survival., (Colorectal Disease © 2016 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate what clinicopathological factors predict lymph node metastases and to investigate their association with survival., Method: Patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for primary anorectal melanoma in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 1989 and 2011 were studied retrospectively. The associations between clinicopathological factors and lymph node metastases and prognosis were determined., Results: Forty-three patients underwent a potentially curative resection with a median follow-up of 20 months; the 5-year overall survival rate was 29.6% with median overall survival of 28 months. Tumour diameter > 3 cm was associated with mesorectal and mesenteric lymph node metastases (P = 0.013). Perineural invasion (hazard ratio 5.683; 95% CI 1.978-16.328; P = 0.001) was the only factor that independently predicted survival., Conclusion: Tumour diameter was associated with mesorectal and mesenteric lymph node metastases; therefore, wide local excision may not be appropriate for surgery with curative intent for patients with a tumour diameter ≥ 3 cm. Perineural invasion was an important prognostic factor for anorectal melanoma., (Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: To examine the short-term outcomes of perineal reconstruction with a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap following abdominoperineal excision (APE)., Method: Retrospective case note review of all patients undergoing APE and primary VRAM reconstruction between July 2001 and February 2012 in a district general hospital tertiary referral centre for APE. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification, which grades complications from I to V in order of increasing severity., Results: Fifty-five consecutive patients (31 men, median age 65, range 38-84 years) underwent APE with VRAM flap reconstruction, 15 for anal cancer and 40 for rectal cancer. Median length of stay was 11 days but was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (8 vs 12 days; P < 0.01) and in patients who did not experience any complications (P < 0.05). Four patients (7%) had major complications (Grade 3 and above) directly related to the flap or donor site., Conclusion: VRAM reconstruction of the perineum can be safely performed following APE with results that compare favourably with other techniques. Most flap complications are minor, although these are still associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay., (Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine factors related to treatment failure following chemoradiotherapy for squamous cancer and to compare the outcome of salvage surgery in one unit with national audit standards published by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) (ACPGBI position statement for management of anal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2011; 13(Suppl. 1): 1-52)., Method: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated with radical intent between 1997 and 2010 in a single tertiary referral oncology institute were prospectively identified. Multivariate analysis was used to establish factors associated with treatment failure. Cancer-specific end-points after salvage surgery were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis., Results: Ninety-five patients received chemoradiotherapy with radical intent with a 5-year overall survival of 83% (all stages) at a median follow up of 35 months. Of these, 11 (12%) required salvage surgery, five of whom were Stage T4 at presentation. Six patients had failed to respond to chemoradiotherapy and five presented with recurrence at a median of 10 (10-36) months. Only Stage T4 disease at presentation was predictive of the need for salvage surgery (OR 5.6, CI 4.9-6.3, P = 0.015). There was no surgical mortality and no delayed perineal healing where a myocutaneous flap was used. The resection margin was involved in one (9%) patient. The 5-year survival rate was 64%. Audit standards for case selection, local control, survival and perineal complications were achieved., Conclusion: Long-term survival was achieved in two- thirds of patients following salvage surgery after failed primary chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer in a multidisciplinary oncological unit. Stage T4 disease at presentation strongly predicted the need for subsequent salvage intervention., (Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Minimal data are available on the role of pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the pelvic organs. This study aimed to highlight our experience of pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent and re-recurrent SCC of the pelvic organs., Method: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for recurrent SCC of the pelvic organs arising from the embryological cloaca from 1994 to 2010 was performed., Results: Twenty-four patients (median age 59, range, 27-79 years) underwent pelvic exenteration for recurrent SCC of the anus (18), cervix and upper vagina (2), lower vagina (1) and the vulva (3). Nine patients with anal SCC had undergone abdominoperineal excision prior to pelvic exenteration. Ten (41.7%) patients underwent a complete pelvic exenteration procedure, while sacrectomy was performed in 13 (54.2%) patients. There was no 30-day inpatient mortality. An R0 resection was achieved in 15 (62.5%) patients. Three (12.5%) had R1 resections while 6 (25%) had R2 resections. In the 15 patients with an R0 resection, 7 (46.7%) developed metastatic disease at a median of 18 (range 10-131) months. After a median follow-up of 26 (range 4-169) months, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 64% [95% confidence interval (CI), 44-84%] and 57% (95% CI 35-79%), respectively., Conclusion: Pelvic exenteration for recurrent SCC of the cloaca is safe and feasible even after previous salvage surgery. An R0 resection can be achieved in 62.5% of the patients with reasonable early survival though less than published recurrent rectal cancer studies., (Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Parastomal herniation of end colostomies can be chronically debilitating for patients and a difficult problem to treat. To prevent parastomal hernia (PSH) formation an extraperitoneal colostomy (EPC) approach has been developed in open colorectal surgery and some studies have suggested a potential advantage to this approach. Here we describe our technique of laparoscopic extraperitoneal stoma formation and present our experience to date., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection between March 1999 and March 2011. We performed the EPC technique as follows: under laparoscopic guidance, a smooth tip instrument was used to gently separate the peritoneum from the posterior aponeurotic plane to create an extraperitoneal tunnel running from the skin incision to the left flank of the abdominal cavity to join the previously dissected paracolic gutter. The colon was exteriorized and the position was checked to ensure the absence of torsion or kinking., Results: Twenty-two patients underwent a standard laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with total mesorectal excision. Colostomy was constructed extraperitoneally (EPC) or transperitoneally (TPC) in 12 and 10 patients respectively. There were five complications requiring operative intervention: two stomal necrosis and one surgical site infection in the TPC group and two small bowel occlusions in the EPC group. Four patients from the TPC group developed PSH at 24, 36, 48 and 72 months respectively while there were no cases of PSH in the EPC group., Conclusion: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colostomy showed a potential reduction of PSH in our series of patients., (© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is the only curative treatment for recurrent or persisting squamous cell carcinoma of the anus after radiochemotherapy. A vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reduces perineal morbidity. The sexual life (SL) of women after APR is unknown. Aims of this study were to evaluate SF of women after APR., Method: 47 women alive after APR performed between 1996 and 2007 were included. SL was evaluated using the female sexual function index (FSFI) score., Results: 29 (62%) women answered the questionnaire: 15 (52%) had a VRAM and 16 (55%) a colpectomy. Among the 21 patients with SL before surgery, 16 (76%) still had intercourse with a mean FSFI score of 19.5 ± 10.9 [4.8-36]. Main difficulties reported were troubles of lubrication, orgasm, and dyspareunia. Confection of a VRAM did not influence the recovery of SL (P = 0.717). Colpectomy reduced return of SL (P = 0.026)., Conclusion: Among women who had SL before APR, 76% still had sexual intercourse after. Colpectomy seems to reduce SL., (© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Objective: Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal excision (APE) for anorectal cancer represent a considerable source of morbidity for patients. Strategies to improve wound healing include reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps. This is an evidence-based review of reconstruction of pelvic defects after APE, using rectus abdominus (RAM), gracilis and gluteus maximus flaps., Method: A Pubmed search was performed using MESH headings., Results: Thirty-six studies reported outcomes of interest. Five controlled studies reported improved outcomes after APE and chemoradiotherapy with RAM reconstruction and two controlled studies reported improved outcomes with gracilis reconstruction. There were seven patients with total flap loss after RAM reconstruction, in a combined 300 patients. There were eight patients with complete cutaneous necrosis after gracilis reconstruction in a combined 83 patients., Conclusion: Data from the controlled studies support the use of myocutaneous flaps for single-stage reconstruction after APE in the presence of chemoradiotherapy. Ultimately, the choice of flap depends on the goals of reconstruction, size of the defect and the availability of donor tissue. The implications of an expanding role for radiotherapy in the treatment of low rectal cancer and radical dissection to achieve negative circumferential margins, necessitate close co-operation between colorectal and reconstructive surgeons to achieve APE with reduced wound morbidity.

Objective: To evaluate the role of the V-Y bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap (GLM) in the reconstruction of large perineal defects after wide surgical resections for pelvic malignancies., Method: Twelve consecutive patients (seven females and five males), of mean age 59 years (36-78), with primary or recurrent pelvic malignancies (rectal, anal and vulvar carcinoma), underwent either abdomino-perineal rectum excision with partial sacrectomy or total pelvic exenteration. The perineal defect was reconstructed by means of a GLM flap. Intra-operative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications and long-term outcome were retrospectively assessed., Results: One patient died postoperatively. All the remaining patients had at least one early and/or late complication. After a mean follow-up of 31.2 months, seven patients were alive. No major functional impairment in daily activities was observed. Five patients experienced a slight discomfort in either walking, sitting or cycling., Conclusion: Gluteus maximus myocutaneus flap is a useful technique for the repair of perineo-pelvic defects after abdomino-perineal rectum excision with partial sacrectomy.

This is a report of adenocarcinoma arising in an ileal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with rectal mucosal stripping performed by Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) for ulcerative colitis. The CUSA was introduced to simplify and optimize ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with mucosectomy and has been shown to shorten the operative time and reduce blood loss. Its use however, may increase the number of pathology specimens made uninterpretable on account of tissue ablation. In the present case, even though preoperative colonoscopy had clearly shown dysplasia, the surgical pathology report could not detect any neoplasia in the specimen; hence, the patient was not surveyed for pouch cancer. Six years later, the patient presented with intestinal obstruction caused by cancer. While protocols for universal pouch surveillance remain somewhat controversial, we conclude on the basis of this case and a review of the literature that in RPC with mucosectomy performed by CUSA, pouch cancer surveillance is particularly important because remnants of rectal epithelium may have been left behind and tissue ablation may have made the surgical pathology report uninterpretable.

The development of adenocarcinoma in the anal transitional zone, after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, is rare. We report the first Asian and sixth known case. A 41-year-old Indian lady had a long standing history of ulcerative colitis. Restorative proctocolectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy was performed. She remained asymptomatic until 3 years later when she complained of discomfort on defecation. A poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the anal transition zone was diagnosed and she subsequently underwent an abdomino-perineal resection. The previously reported cases in the literature are reviewed. We also discuss the suggested surveillance for high-risk patients who have undergone an ileal-anal pouch anastomosis.

The currently accepted first line treatment for epidermoid anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Tumour size and adjacent organ involvement are the key in the pretreatment assessment for T1-T4 tumours respectively. Residual or recurrent disease following initial CRT, is best treated by salvage anorectal excision. Pathological staging systems of resections were historically validated when surgery was the primary treatment and are therefore in need of revision. We propose a new pathological staging system for salvage anorectal excision specimens to allow improved prognostic guidelines postoperatively.

Objective: Chemotherapy and radiation (C-XRT) is the first-line therapy for epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal (ECAC). Treatment failure occurs in up to 33% of patients. Salvage-abdominoperineal resection (APR) is the treatment of choice for locoregional failure but pre-operative radiation may increase wound complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient survival and wound complications after salvage-APR for C-XRT failure., Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of all patients who failed initial C-XRT for ECAC diagnosed between 1992 and 2002. We evaluated patient demographics, treatment, tumour characteristics, survival and postoperative complications., Results: Nineteen patients were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 55 years. Eight (42%) patients had persistent disease; 11 (58%) had tumour recurrence. APR was performed in 15 patients. Perineal wound complications occurred in 12 (80%) patients; half were major complications. Primary flap reconstruction at time of APR was performed in 5 (33%) patients; 2 experienced major wound complications. Overall-survival after salvage APR was 40% (6/15) and disease-free survival was 47% (7/15) at a median follow-up of 14 months (range 2-95 months). Recurrence after salvage-APR occurred in 7 (47%) patients at a median follow-up of 5 months (range 3-19 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed an advantage for recurrent over persistent disease with 2-year and 5-year survival rates of 75%vs 34% and 28%vs 0%, respectively., Conclusions: Failure of C-XRT for ECAC is associated with a poor prognosis. Although salvage APR may be curative in some patients, perineal wound complications are frequent and primary flap reconstruction is not reliable.

Objective: Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer should identify patients with extrarectal spread, who might benefit from pre-operative radiotherapy, and patients with minimal sphincteral involvement, who can avoid permanent colostomy. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to predict tumour stage and sphincter status., Patients and Methods: Thirty-three patients with a rectal tumour were pre-operatively assessed by MRI with a phased-array coil. Imaging results were correlated with the final pathological findings., Results: The overall accuracy of pre-operative staging with MRI was 88% (k = 0.75) for extramural tumour invasion and 59% (k = 0.26) for lymph node metastases. MRI correctly evaluated the infiltration of the anal sphincters in 87% of patients (7 of 8 patients with low rectal tumour)., Conclusion: MRI provides the surgeon with valuable information regarding extramural tumour spread and sphincteral involvement, enabling appropriate selection of patients for pre-operative adjuvant therapy or sphincter-saving surgery.

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for most patients with epidermoid anal cancer. Pre-treatment staging is based on size for T1-T3 lesions and clinical and radiological assessment of adjacent organ invasion for T4 lesions. For patients with residual or recurrent carcinoma, anorectal excision offers the best chance of oncological salvage. Pathological staging systems for anorectal excision specimens were validated at the time when surgical treatment was first line therapy. A validated staging system is necessary for salvage surgical excision specimens following an attempt to cure by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the purpose of prognosis and further treatment planning.