Search

Aim The COVID‐19 pandemic has forced surgeons to adapt their standard procedures. The modifications introduced are designed to favour minimally invasive surgery. The positive results obtained with intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in the right colon and rectum prompt us to adapt these procedures to the left colon. We describe a ‘don't touch the bowel’ technique and outline the benefits to patients of the use of less surgically aggressive techniques and also to surgeons in terms of the lower emission of aerosols that might transmit the COVID‐19 infection. Methods This was an observational study of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in left colectomy. We describe the technical details of intracorporeal resection, end‐to‐end stapled anastomosis and extraction of the specimen through mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location. Results We present preliminary results of 17 patients with left‐sided colonic pathologies, 15 neoplasia and two diverticular disease, who underwent four left hemicolectomies, six sigmoidectomies and seven high anterior resections. Median operating time was 186 min (range 120–280). No patient required conversion to extracorporeal laparoscopy or open surgery. Median hospital stay was 4.7 days (range 3–12 days). There was one case of anastomotic leak managed with conservative treatment. Conclusion Intracorporeal resection and end‐to‐end anastomosis with the possibility of extraction of the specimen by a mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location may present benefits and also adapts well to the conditions imposed by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Future comparative studies are needed to demonstrate these benefits with respect to extracorporeal anastomosis.

Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice. Method A cross-sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist. Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type-III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%. Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.