Search

Objective The aim of this paper was to analyse the results of treatment of anal fistulas retrospectively. Methods Between 1992 and 2004, 407 patients were operated on for perianal fistula. In the follow-up period, 107 patients were lost, so 300 patients were analysed in the study. The mean follow-up time was 4.2 years. Analysed parameters included: types of surgical procedures in different kinds of fistulas and postoperative complications. Various types of surgical procedures and their effectiveness were described. Late results were assessed taking into account healing time, duration of sick leave, recurrence rate and incidence of anal sphincter dysfunction. Severity of gas and stool incontinence was assessed according to the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. Results In our study, subcutaneous fistula was diagnosed in 23.3%, inter-sphincteric in 18%, trans-sphincteric in 37.7%, supra-sphincteric in 16% and extra-sphincteric in 5% of patients. Single-tract fistulas were present in 88.7% and multi-tract fistulas were present in 11.3%. Overall, 242 patients had primary fistulas and 58 patients had recurrent fistulas. The most frequently performed procedures were cutting seton (139 patients) and radical fistulectomy (104 patients). Recurrent fistulas developed in 14.3%. Postoperative gas and/or stool incontinence was noticed in 10.7%. The recurrence rate was 5.4% in patients with primary fistula and in 51.7% patients presenting with a recurrent fistula. Gas and stool incontinence developed in 3.7% of patients with primary fistulas and in 39.7% of patients presenting with recurrent fistulas. Recurrence rate was 12% in the patients of single-tract fistulas and 32.4% in the patients of multi-tract fistulas. Postoperative gas and/or stool incontinence occurred in 8.3% of patients of single-tract fistulas and in 29.4% of patients of multi-tract fistulas. Conclusions The complication rate was 10-fold higher in patients presenting with a recurrent fistula than in those with primary fistulas and threefold higher in patients with multi-tract fistulas than in those with single-tract fistulas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The necessity, timing and benefits of follow-up after rectal cancer surgery remain controversial, with two years traditionally considered adequate to detect most local recurrences. This unit has a policy of lifetime follow-up, and this paper investigates, at 23 years, the value of prolonged surveillance.Six hundred and sixty consecutive patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer were prospectively followed-up between 1978 and 2002, and local or systemic recurrence recorded. This analysis was performed on the 509/660 (76%) patients who underwent potentially curative surgery.Total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed in 422/509 (83%) patients, mesorectal transection in 78 (15%), and local excision in 9 (2%). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 23 years (mean = 9.7). Seven (1.4%) patients had local recurrence alone, 11 (2.2%) local plus systemic, and 86 (17%) systemic recurrence alone. Of the local recurrences 3 (17%) became evident within 1 year, 9 (50%) within 2 years, 16 (89%) within 5 years, and 2 (11%) presented after 5 years, at 5.6 and 5.8 years. Of the systemic recurrences 26 (27%) became evident within 1 year, 57 (59%) within 2 years, 93 (96%) within 5 years, and 4 (4%) presented after 5 years at 5.3, 5.3, 5.4 and 7.9 years.This long-term surveillance of patients undergoing curative surgery for rectal cancer demonstrates that most local and systemic recurrences occur within 5 years. Almost half occurred more than 2 years after surgery. However, those centres wishing to set standards of care, or evaluate current or new therapies in rectal cancer treatment, should be aware that unexpected late recurrences occasionally develop. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]