Search

Number processing induces spatial attention shifts to the left or right side for small or large numbers, respectively. This spatial-numerical association (SNA) extends to mental calculation, such that subtractions and additions induce left or right biases, respectively. However, the time course of activating SNAs during mental calculation is unclear. Here, we addressed this issue by measuring visual position discrimination during auditory calculation. Thirty-four healthy adults listened in each trial to five successive elements of arithmetic facts (first operand, operator, second operand, equal and result) and verbally classified their correctness. After each element (except for the result), a fixation dot moved equally often to either the left or right side and participants pressed left or right buttons to discriminate its movement direction (four times per trial). First and second operand magnitude (small/large), operation (addition/subtraction), result correctness (right/wrong) and movement direction (left/right) were balanced across 128 trials. Manual reaction times of dot movement discriminations were considered in relation to previous arithmetic elements. We found no evidence of early attentional shifts after first operand and operator presentation. Discrimination performance was modulated consistent with SNAs after the second operand, suggesting that attentional shifts occur once there is access to all elements necessary to complete an arithmetic operation. Such late-occurring attention shifts may reflect a combination of multiple element-specific biases and confirm their functional role in mental calculation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present study we considered the two factors that have been advocated for playing a role in emotional attention: perception of gaze direction and facial expression of emotions. Participants performed an oculomotor task in which they had to make a saccade towards one of the two lateral targets, depending on the colour of the fixation dot which appeared at the centre of the computer screen. At different time intervals (stimulus onset asynchronies, SOAs: 50,100,150 ms) following the onset of the dot, a picture of a human face (gazing either to the right or to the left) was presented at the centre of the screen. The gaze direction of the face could be congruent or incongruent with respect to the location of the target, and the expression could be neutral or angry. In Experiment 1 the facial expressions were presented randomly in a single block, whereas in Experiment 2 they were shown in separate blocks. Latencies for correct saccades and percentage of errors (saccade direction errors) were considered in the analyses. Results showed that incongruent trials determined a significantly higher percentage of saccade direction errors with respect to congruent trials, thus confirming that gaze direction, even when task-irrelevant, interferes with the accuracy of the observer’s oculomotor behaviour. The angry expression was found to hold attention for a longer time with respect to the neutral one, producing delayed saccade latencies. This was particularly evident at 100 ms SOA and for incongruent trials. Emotional faces may then exert a modulatory effect on overt attention mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies using spatial cueing paradigms have demonstrated that observing gaze direction may trigger a reflexive visual orienting in the direction of the other person’s gaze. Recently, it has been reported that facial expression may enhance the reflexive orienting of attention to gaze stimuli. However, some researchers have also suggested that, rather than facilitating attentional orienting away from the face, emotional expressions may, in fact, delay or prevent orienting. In the present study we investigated the effects of facial expression and gaze direction on a visual orienting oculomotor task to test whether an angry face may or may not interfere with visual orienting. Participants performed an oculomotor task in which they had to make a saccade towards one of two lateral targets, depending upon the colour of the fixation dot which appeared at the centre of the computer screen. The instruction dot remained visible for 50 ms and then disappeared. At different time intervals (stimulus onset asynchronies, SOAs: 50, 100, 150 ms) following the onset of the instruction cue, a real face (gazing either to the right or to the left) was presented at the centre of the monitor. Gaze direction could be congruent or incongruent with respect to the instruction and target location. Facial expression was also manipulated. In half of the trials the diverted gaze (i.e., congruent or incongruent) appeared with an angry expression, whereas in the other half the face had a neutral expression. Participants were instructed to saccade either to the target on the left or to the target on the right (the targets were visible throughout the trial), as indicated by the instruction dot, while completely disregarding the face because it was irrelevant for the task. Eye movement recordings on correct trials showed that saccades congruent with the direction of the distracting gaze had shorter latencies than incongruent ones. However, the time-course of this effect varied depending on the facial expression. With a neutral expression, the congruency effect was found only at the shortest SOA (50 ms). On the contrary, for the angry face the congruency effect occurred at the longer SOAs. These findings suggest that gaze direction (even when task-irrelevant) is capable of interfering with the orienting of visual attention, and that faces with an angry expression may hold attention and affect its orienting longer than a neutral expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]