Search

In the present study, some modifications were made to the zona-free nuclear transfer technique in the mouse in order to achieve greater efficiency. Firstly, a 1-h interval was allowed between cumulus removal and zona pellucida digestion. Secondly, acid Tyrode's was selected for zona pellucida removal, because contrary to pronase, it allows embryo survival during parthenogenic activation in the absence of calcium. Even when the exposure time to pronase was reduced to as little as 1 min or washed with fetal calf serum to inhibit the enzyme, the percentage of lysis during activation in the absence of calcium was still very high. Thirdly, electrofusion was performed at room temperature (21 degrees C), instead of 30 degrees C as in our previous experiments. Finally, embryos were cultured in groups of 12-15, instead of individually, using a "well of the wells" system during activation and culture. When compared, parthenogenic activated control embryos showed an increase in the development to blastocyst when cultured in pairs instead of individually. By the end of the experiments and using embryonic stem (ES) cells, there was a significant increase in fusion rate (1.5-fold increase) and in development to morula/blastocyst from cleaved reconstructed embryos (1.5-fold increase) when compared with the results before the modifications. A 2.4-fold increase in overall efficiency was achieved from the oocyte to morula/blastocyst stages.

Choosing the right nuclear donor is the most critical decision in cloning by nuclear transfer (NT), or nuclear cloning, because the cloned animal will be a genetic copy of the donor cell genome used for NT. Both donor cell type and cell cycle stage are important methodological parameters and influence nuclear cloning efficiency. Cloning, however, is a multi-step procedure and the exact contribution of the nuclear donor to overall cloning success must be determined in comparative studies. This requires strict standardization of isolation, purification, and culture protocols, and application of stringent identification criteria in order to obtain a homogenous donor cell population. In all these respects, the standards in the cloning field are currently poor. The aim of this review is to provide a brief guideline for the major practical aspects of donor cell selection, cell cycle synchronization and preparation for NT.

In the present study, a zona-free nuclear transfer (NT) technique, which had been originally developed in cattle, was modified for the mouse. Steps involved in this approach include removing the zona pellucida and enucleating without a holding pipette; sticking donor cells to the cytoplast before electric pulses are applied to fuse them and culturing reconstructed embryos individually in single droplets, to prevent aggregation. Control zona-free and zona-intact embryos from mated donors showed no significant difference in development to blastocyst, but did show reduced development to term. Removal of the zona pellucida affected the response to activation by strontium in the absence of calcium as a significant proportion of zona-free control oocytes and embryos reconstructed by NT lysed during this treatment. A comparison between cumulus and ES cells as donor cells revealed significant differences in fusion efficiency (58.1 +/- 4.0%, n = 573 vs. 42.9 +/- 2.2%, n = 2064, respectively, p < 0.001), cleavage (77.2 +/- 3.4%, n = 334 vs. 40.8 +/- 2.7%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.001) but not for development to morula/blastocyst (8.7 +/- 2.1%, n = 334 vs. 13.9 +/- 1.8%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.1). The stage at which embryo development arrested was also affected by donor cell type. A majority of embryos reconstructed from cumulus cells arrested at two-cell stage, usually with two nuclei, whereas those reconstructed from ES cells arrested at one-cell stage, usually with two pseudo-pronuclei. After transfer of ES cell-derived NT embryos, a viable cloned mouse was produced (3.0% of transferred embryos developed to term). These observations establish that a zona-free cloning approach is possible in the mouse, although further research is required to increase the efficiency.

As the demand for cloned embryos and offspring increases, the need arises for the development of nuclear transfer procedures that are improved in both efficiency and ease of operation. Here, we describe a novel zona-free cloning method that doubles the throughput in cloned bovine embryo production over current procedures and generates viable offspring with the same efficiency. Elements of the procedure include zona-free enucleation without a holding pipette, automated fusion of 5-10 oocyte-donor cell pairs and microdrop in vitro culture. Using this system, zona-free embryos were reconstructed from five independent primary cell lines and cultured either singularly (single-IVC) or as aggregates of three (triple-IVC). Blastocysts of transferable quality were obtained at similar rates from zona-free single-IVC, triple-IVC, and control zona-intact embryos (33%, 25%, and 29%, respectively). In a direct comparison, there was no significant difference in development to live calves at term between single-IVC, triple-IVC, and zona-intact embryos derived from the same adult fibroblast line (10%, 13%, and 15%, respectively). This zona-free cloning method could be straightforward for users of conventional cloning procedures to adopt and may prove a simple, fast, and efficient alternative for nuclear cloning of other species as well.

The few viable clones obtained at the end of a typical cloning experiment are genetic copies of the donor cell genome of a non-reproductive (somatic) or embryonic cell used for nuclear transfer. Nuclear totipotency has to be reestablished by erasing epigenetic constraints imposed on the donor genome during differentiation in a process which involves active chromatin remodeling. Various donor cell types and cell cycle combinations have proven to be capable of generating cloned offspring. However, an ideal nuclear donor may have not yet been found. This review summarizes current theoretical aspects of donor cell selection. It focuses on the impact of genetic and epigenetic differences between donor cell types on successful mammalian cloning.

The few viable clones obtained at the end of a typical cloning experiment are genetic copies of the donor cell genome of a nonreproductive (somatic) or embryonic cell used for nuclear transfer. Nuc...