Search

IntroductionFrailty status affects outcomes after heart transplantation, but the optimal way to assess frailty prior to transplant remains unknown.MethodsThis single-center, observational study assessed 44 heart transplant candidates for frailty using three methods. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) were used as two physical assessments of frailty. The Frailty Risk Score (FRS) was used as a chart-review based assessment measuring 20 different biopsychosocial and functional components, including biomarkers, depression, cognitive impairment, and sleep.ResultsWe determined the correlation between FRS, SPPB, and FFP and how each correlated with clinical outcomes. Of 44 participants, mean age was 60 years. FRS correlated with SPPB and FFP (P = .043, P

After kidney transplantation, infection and death are important clinical complications, especially for the growing numbers of older patients with limited resilience to withstand adverse events. Evaluation of changes in gene expression in immune cells can reveal the underlying mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. A cohort of 60 kidney transplant recipients was evaluated. Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 3 months after kidney transplantation was analyzed to compare differences between patients with infection and those who were infection-free in the first-year post-transplant. Pro-inflammatory genes such as IL1B, CCL4, and TNF were found to be downregulated in post-transplant PBMC from patients who developed infection. In contrast, genes involved in metabolism, HLA genes, and transcripts involved in type I interferon innate antiviral responses were found to be upregulated. Promoter-based bioinformatic analyses implicated increased activity of interferon regulatory factors, erythroid nuclear factor (E2), and CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) in patients who developed infections. Differential patterns of gene expression were observed in patients who developed infection after kidney transplantation, with patterns distinct from changes associated with patient age, suggesting possible mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. Assessment of gene expression in blood may offer an approach for patient risk stratification and monitoring after transplantation.

The infectious disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on solid organ transplantations, including heart transplantation, is currently unclear. Many transplant programs have been forced to swiftly re-evaluate and adapt their practices, leading to a marked decrease in transplants performed. This trend has been due to various factors, including increased donor COVID-19 screening scrutiny and recipient waiting list management in anticipation of COVID-19 critical care surge capacity planning. In the face of these unknown variables, determining when and how to proceed with transplantation in our population of patients with end-stage cardiomyopathies is challenging. Here, we describe our center's experience with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in one of the country's pandemic epicenters, where we performed eight OHTs in the first 2 months after community spread began in late February 2020.

Frailty, defined as a state of decreased physiologic reserve, has been correlated with poorer outcomes after hospitalization or surgery. Studies in lung transplant patients have associated frailty with an increased risk of post‐transplant mortality; however, a unified approach is lacking. The identification of frail patients can help clinicians pre‐emptively target modifiable risk factors and may facilitate risk stratification. The Frailty Risk Score (FRS) is a chart review‐based approach based on eight symptoms and four laboratory biomarkers. We applied this method in a retrospective study to investigate its utility in predicting post‐transplant lung outcomes. Eighty‐four lung transplant recipients were evaluated, including 51 older (≥ 60) and 33 younger (< 60) patients. Median FRS score was 3.9, with 63 categorized as frail (75%) and 21 as non‐frail (25%), using a previously published cut‐off of ≥3 to define frailty. A high FRS was associated with readmission in the first year after transplantation and with the number of readmissions. There was also an association between FRS score and death (p =.047). FRS may be a viable tool in the assessment of lung transplant candidates. Frail patients may benefit from earlier referral and targeted therapy prior to transplant, as well as close post‐transplant follow‐up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of adenovirus infections after solid organ transplantation. Adenovirus is an important cause of infectious complications in both stem cell transplant and SOT patients, causing a range of clinical syndromes including pneumonitis, colitis, and disseminated disease. The current update of the guidelines highlights that adenovirus surveillance testing should not be performed in asymptomatic recipients. Serial quantitative PCR might play a role in the decision to initiate or assess response to therapy in a symptomatic patient. The initial and most important components of therapy remain supportive care and decrease in immunosuppression. The use of antiviral therapy is not supported by prospective randomized clinical trials. However, intravenous cidofovir is considered the standard practice for treatment of severe, progressive, or disseminated adenovirus disease in most transplant centers. Intravenous immunoglobulin may be beneficial, primarily in a select group of patients with hypogammaglobulinemia. Future approaches to treatment of adenovirus disease may include administration of adenovirus‐specific T‐cell therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]