5 results on '"Kleiboeker, Hanna L."'
Search Results
2. Incidence and outcomes of fever of unknown origin after kidney transplant in the modern era.
- Author
-
Jorgenson, Margaret R., Parajuli, Sandesh, Kleiboeker, Hanna L., Felix, Daniel C., Astor, Brad C., Saddler, Christopher M., Smith, Jeannina A., and Mandelbrot, Didier A.
- Subjects
KIDNEY transplantation ,OVERALL survival ,GRAFT survival ,FEVER ,DIAGNOSTIC imaging - Abstract
Background: While presumably less common with modern molecular diagnostic and imaging techniques, fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains a challenge in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Additionally, the impact of FUO on patient and graft survival is poorly described. Methods: A cohort of adult KTRs between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2018 was followed at the University of Wisconsin Hospital. Patients transplanted from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2005 were included in the "early era"; patients transplanted from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2018 were included in the "modern era". The primary objective was to describe the epidemiology and etiology of FUO diagnoses over time. Secondary outcomes included rejection, graft and patient survival. Results: There were 5590 kidney transplants at our center during the study window. FUO was identified in 323 patients with an overall incidence rate of.8/100 person‐years. Considering only the first 3 years after transplant, the incidence of FUO was significantly lower in the modern era than in the early era, with an Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) per 100 person‐years of.48; 95% CI:.35–.63; p <.001. A total of 102 (31.9%) of 323 patients had an etiology determined within 90 days after FUO diagnosis: 100 were infectious, and two were malignancies. In the modern era, FUO remained significantly associated with rejection (HR = 44.1; 95% CI: 16.6–102; p <.001) but not graft failure (HR = 1.21; 95% CI:.68–2.18; p =.52) total graft loss (HR = 1.17; 95% CI:.85–1.62; p =.34), or death (HR = 1.17; 95% CI:.79–1.76; p =.43. Conclusions: FUO is less common in KTRs during the modern era. Our study suggests infection remains the most common etiology. FUO remains associated with significant increases in risk of rejection, warranting further inquiry into the management of immunosuppressive medications in SOT recipients in the setting of FUO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Seasonal variation of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipients
- Author
-
Jorgenson, Margaret R., primary, Kleiboeker, Hanna L., additional, Astor, Brad C., additional, Gentry, Amy C., additional, Saddler, Christopher M., additional, Smith, Jeannina A., additional, Aziz, Fahad, additional, Mandelbrot, Didier, additional, and Garg, Neetika, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Seasonal variation of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipients.
- Author
-
Jorgenson, Margaret R., Kleiboeker, Hanna L., Astor, Brad C., Gentry, Amy C., Saddler, Christopher M., Smith, Jeannina A., Aziz, Fahad, Mandelbrot, Didier, and Garg, Neetika
- Subjects
- *
SEASONAL variations of diseases , *KIDNEY transplantation , *SUMMER , *SPRING , *AUTUMN , *KIDNEY diseases - Abstract
Purpose: Studies conducted in the northern United States found cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after liver transplantation follows a seasonal pattern, with increased incidence in fall and winter. This has not been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients. Improved understanding of CMV seasonality may help guide use of preventative therapies. Methods: We evaluated adult patients receiving a kidney transplant at our center in Wisconsin from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2018. CMV event was defined as quantifiable viral replication with clinical signs or symptoms suspicious for CMV per current consensus recommendations. Seasons were divided as follows: winter (December–February), spring (March–May), summer (June–August), and fall (September–November). The primary objective was to evaluate the annual distribution of CMV disease and determine whether this differed by season. Results: There were 6151 kidney transplants in the study period. A total of 913 patients had 1492 episodes of CMV. Median time from transplant to first detection was 5.51 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.87–11.7). The observed overall incidence exceeded the expected incidence in winter (+.7%), spring (+5.5%), and fall (+3.4%) and was less than expected in summer (−9.5%) (p =.18). The incidence of CMV during summer, however, was 21% less than expected (p =.001) in recipients who were CMV positive (R+) at the time of transplantation. No such difference was observed in CMV negative recipients (R−; p =.58). Conclusion: CMV after kidney transplant appears to be less common during the summer season in patients who were R+ at transplant but does not follow seasonal variation in R−. Reasons for this are unclear but are likely related to CMV‐specific cell‐mediated immunity. These findings may have clinical implications, particularly the use of non‐pharmacologic strategies to improve response to antiviral therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Impact of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis on Myelosuppression and Immunosuppression in Lung Transplant Recipients.
- Author
-
Kleiboeker HL, Prom A, Paplaczyk K, Wang J, Borkowski N, Miner B, Wright J, Venkata Subramani M, Arunachalam A, Betensley AD, Tomic R, and Myers CN
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies, Prognosis, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Postoperative Complications prevention & control, Transplant Recipients, Immunosuppression Therapy adverse effects, Immunosuppression Therapy methods, Risk Factors, Graft Survival drug effects, Adult, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Immunosuppressive Agents adverse effects, Quinazolines, Lung Transplantation adverse effects, Cytomegalovirus Infections prevention & control, Cytomegalovirus Infections etiology, Antiviral Agents therapeutic use, Cytomegalovirus drug effects, Acetates therapeutic use, Acetates administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with detrimental outcomes after lung transplantation (LTX); primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is guideline-recommended. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, spurring interest in letermovir (LTV)., Methods: Adults undergoing LTX between January 1, 2021, and July 30, 2022 at our institution who were converted from VGC to LTV for PPX were evaluated. Outcomes included antimetabolite dosing during PPX, the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events, and the time to the first myelosuppressive event., Results: Twenty-nine LTX recipients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients received non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and had moderate risk CMV serostatus (D+/R+, 48.3%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV 177 days (IQR 102 days) post-transplant. After conversion to LTV, patients tolerated higher daily doses of mycophenolate (721 mg vs. 1000 mg, p = 0.008) or azathioprine (33.3 mg vs. 62.5 mg, p = 0.478). The incidence of myelosuppressive events was reduced (100.0% vs. 62.1%, p < 0.001) including leukopenia (96.6% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.001), severe leukopenia (82.8% vs 31.0%, p < 0.001) and neutropenia requiring GCSF (96.6% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.001) while on VGC compared to LTV. While on LTV, patients had a reduced rate of myelosuppressive events compared to VGC (1 event per 6.2 patient days vs. 1 event per 14.7 patient days, p < 0.001). While on LTV, one patient had breakthrough viremia (3.4%) that was treated with (val)ganciclovir., Conclusions: In this single-center study, patients tolerated higher doses of antimetabolite immunosuppression, and the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events were reduced while on LTV compared to VGC. This evidence expands upon the current literature demonstrating improved tolerability of LTV in LTX recipients., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.