Search

Introduction: Although lung demand continues to outpace supply, 75% of potential donor lungs are discarded without being transplanted in the United States. To identify the discarded cohorts best suited to alleviate the lung shortage and reduce waitlist mortality, we explored changes in survival over time for five marginal donor definitions: age >60 years, smoking history >20 pack-years, PaO 2 /FiO 2  < 300 mmHg, purulent bronchoscopic secretions, and chest radiograph infiltrates., Methods: Our retrospective cohort study separated 27 803 lung recipients in the UNOS Database into three 5-year eras by transplant date: 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test were used to compare survival across the eras., Results: Three definitions-low PaO 2 /FiO 2 , purulent bronchoscopic secretions, and abnormal chest radiographs-did not bear out as truly marginal, demonstrating lack of significantly elevated risk. Advanced donor age demonstrated considerable survival improvement (HR (95% CI): 1.47 (1.26-1.72) in 2005-2009 down to 1.14 (.97-1.35) for 2015-2019), with protective factors being recipients <60 years, moderate recipient BMI, and low Lung Allocation Score (LAS). Donors with smoking history failed to demonstrate any significant improvement (HR (95% CI): 1.09 (1.01-1.17) in 2005-2009 increasing to 1.22 (1.08-1.38) in 2015-2019)., Conclusions: Advanced donor age, previously the most significant risk factor, has improved to near-benchmark levels, demonstrating the possibility for matching older donors to healthier non-elderly recipients in selected circumstances. Low PaO 2 /FiO 2 , bronchoscopic secretions, and abnormal radiographs demonstrated survival on par with standard donors. Significant donor smoking history, a moderate risk factor, has failed to improve., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Despite improvements in survival across races in the past 20 years, African Americans have worse liver transplant outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study aims at quantifying the change in disparities between African Americans and other races in survival after OLT. We retrospectively analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for patient data for candidates who received a liver transplant between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression indicated similar decreases in mortality over time for each race with a decrease in mortality for African Americans: 2010-2012 (HR = .930), 2012-2015 (HR = .882), and 2015-2017 (HR = .883) when compared to 2007-2010. Risk of mortality for African Americans compared to Caucasians varied across the 4 eras: 2007-2010 (HR = 1.083), 2010-2012 (HR = 1.090), 2012-2015 (HR = 1.070), and 2015-2017 (HR = 1.125). While African Americans have seen increases in survival in the past decade, a similar increase in survival for other races leaves a significant survival disparity in African Americans., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The study of marginal liver transplant outcomes, including post-transplant length of stay (LOS), is necessary for determining the practicality of their use. 50 155 patients who received transplants from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed with data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression. Six different definitions were used to classify an allograft as being marginal: 90 th percentile Donor Risk Index (DRI) allografts, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, national share donors, donors over 70, donors with > 30% macrovesicular steatosis, or 90 th percentile Discard Risk Index donors. 24% (n = 12 124) of subjects received marginal allografts. Average LOS was 15.6 days among those who received standard allografts. Among those who received marginal allografts, LOS was found to be highest in those who received 90 th percentile DRI allografts at 15.6 days, and lowest in those who received DCD allografts at 12.7 days. Apart from fatty livers (95% CI .86-.98), marginal allografts were not associated with a prolonged LOS. We conclude that accounting for experience and recipient matching, transplant centers may be more aggressive in their use of extended criteria donors with limited fear of increasing LOS and its associated costs., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The numberof patients awaiting heart transplantation (HTx) substantially exceeds the number of donor hearts transplanted each year, yet nearly 65% of eligible donor hearts are discarded rather than transplanted., Methods: Deceased organ donors listed within the UNOS Deceased Donor Database between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Those greater than 10 years old and consented for heart donation were included and randomly separated into training (n = 48 435) and validation (n = 24 217) cohorts. A discard risk index (DSRI) was created using the results of univariable and multivariable analyses. Discard data were assessed at DSRI value deciles, and stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival function were used for mortality data., Results: Factors associated with higher DSRI values included donor age > 45, LVEF, HBV-core antibodies, hypertension, and diabetes. The DSRI C-statistic was .906 in the training cohort and .904 in the validation cohort. The DSRI did not reliably predict 30-day or 1-year mortality after transplantation (C-statistic .539 and .532, respectively)., Conclusions: The factors leading to heart allograft discard are not correlated to the same degree with post-transplant outcomes. This suggests that optimizing utilization of certain allografts with slightly higher risk of discard could increase the heart donor pool with limited impact on posttransplant mortality., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Liver Transplantation has advanced over the past 3 decades, with 1-year survival rates improving 25%. Survival rates for those transplanted has increased to remarkable levels, but survival from the time of listing may not be as revolutionary., Methods: Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test as well as Cox regression analysis was used to retrospectively analyze 211 610 adults listed for LT and 116 299 adult transplant recipients from 1987 to 2016. Our primary endpoints were survival from time of listing to waitlist death or posttransplant death., Results: One-year survival following LT improved dramatically (68% in 1987-1988 vs. 93% in 2016, P < .001). There was no improvement in 1-year intent-to-treat survival: 78.4% for those listed in 1987 and 81.8% for those listed in 2016 (P = .1). Also observed were decreases in the percentage of transplanted candidates from 74.8% in 1987-1988 to 54.7% in 2016 (P < .001) and increased 1-year wait-list mortality from 12.5% in 1987-1988 to 22.6% in 2016 (P = .002)., Conclusion: As transplant rate has decreased while waitlist mortality has increased, no improvements have been made in intent-to-treat survival of patients listed for transplant over the past 3 decades. We speculate this observation to be resultant of a relative donor shortage outpaced by waitlist growth., Summary: Liver Transplantation has experienced vast increases in survival rates over the past 3 decades; however, due to an increased donor supply outpaced by waitlist growth, the rate of transplantation has decreased significantly while the waitlist mortality has increased, leading to no improvement in 1-year intent-to-treat survival rates., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Despite noted improvements in short-term survival outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), review of the relevant literature suggests little improvement in long-term outcomes for patients surviving beyond 1 year., Methods: All OHT cases performed between 1989 and 2019 within the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database were reviewed. Adults who underwent isolated OHT were included in a 1-year survival analysis. Those who survived at least 1 year post-transplant were included in a long-term survival analysis. Demographic factors were assessed using Students' t test and chi-square analysis. Survival trends and risk factors were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and the Cox regression analysis, respectively., Results: A total of 53 265 and 46 372 recipients were included in the short-term and long-term cohorts, respectively. In an adjusted analysis, the reference implant era 2014-2019 had significantly better short-term survival outcomes when compared with earlier implant eras: 1989-1993 (HR: 2.92), 1994-1998 (HR: 1.53), 1999-2003 (HR: 1.27), 2004-2008 (HR: 1.11), and 2009-2013 (HR: 1.02). The same trend was recognized for long-term outcomes: 1989-1993 (HR: 1.87), 1994-1998 (HR: 1.27), 1999-2003 (HR: 1.09), and 2004-2008 (HR: 1.03)., Conclusions: Despite increases in multiple traditional risk factors, both short-term and long-term survival outcomes have consistently improved over the past 30 years, suggesting other factors are contributing to improved outcomes in recent eras., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Given the critical shortage of donor livers, marginal liver allografts have potential to increase donor supply. We investigate trends and long-term outcomes of liver transplant using national share allografts transplanted after rejection at the local and regional levels. We studied a cohort of 75 050 candidates listed in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for liver transplantation between 2002 and 2016. We compared patients receiving national share and regional/local share allografts from 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016, performing multivariate Cox regression for graft survival. Recipient and center-level covariates that were not significant (P < .05) were removed. Graft survival of national share allografts improved over time. National share allografts had a 26% increased risk for graft failure in 2002-2006 but no impact on graft survival in 2007-2011 and 2012-2016. The cold ischemia time (CIT) of national share allografts decreased from 10.4 to 8.0 hours. We demonstrate that CIT had significant impact on graft survival using national share allografts (CIT <6 hours: hazard ratio 0.75 and CIT >12 hours: hazard ratio 1.25). Despite a trend toward sicker recipients and poorer quality allografts, graft survival outcomes using national share allografts have improved to benchmark levels. Reduction in cold ischemia time is a possible explanation., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Severe geographic inequities in liver transplantation have persisted for years. Previous investigators have demonstrated 90-day transplant rates varying from 14% to 82% and death rates varying from 18% to 86%. The aim of this analysis was to utilize a robust multivariate analysis to investigate whether geographic inequities affected the length of stay after liver transplantation., Methods: We conducted a unique Kaplan-Meier analysis with the event being discharge from the hospital and length of stay as the time to the event, using a cohort of 66 674 recipients listed in the UNOS database from 2002 to 2016. Multivariate Cox regression using 43 covariates was used for time-to-event analysis., Results: Region 9 (0.82; CI 0.79-0.85), Region 2 (0.85; CI 0.83-0.88), and Region 10 (0.96; CI 0.93-0.99) were statistically significant factors for prolonged hospital stay. The following covariates were the most significant factors for prolonged hospital stay: serum sodium >150 mEq/L (0.70; CI 0.62-0.78), ICU admission (0.77; CI 0.74-0.80), hospital admission (0.81; 0.79-0.83), region 9 (0.82; CI 0.79-0.85), and ventilator dependence (0.82; CI 0.76-0.88)., Conclusion: In this analysis, we demonstrate regional disparities in hospital length of stay that are significant in robust multivariable Cox regression analysis. We hope the transplant community will take immediate measures to correct geographic inequities., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The Milan criteria (MC) have historically determined eligibility for transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Region 4 expanded the criteria for transplantation in HCC to include a single tumor ≤6 cm or up to 3 tumors with the largest diameter ≤5 cm and total additive diameter ≤9 cm (R4C). The aim of this study was to report the 10-year outcomes of this expanded criteria compared to MC. Transplants performed for HCC in Region 4 between October 2007 and December 2016 were reviewed using the UNOS database. Recipients were categorized based on imaging findings at initial evaluation. A total of 2068 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in 10-year patient survival between the groups (53% MC vs 48% R4C, P = .23). There was also no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (54% MC vs 47% R4C, P = .15) or allograft survival (53% MC vs 48% R4C, P = .16). Finally, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the MC and R4C groups when stratifying patients by locoregional therapy. This study demonstrates promising data that the criteria for liver transplantation in HCC can be safely expanded to the R4C without compromising outcomes., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

An index to predict hospital length of stay after liver transplantation could address unmet clinical needs. Length of stay is an important surrogate for hospital costs and efforts to limit stays can preserve our healthcare resources. Here, we devised a scoring system that predicts hospital length of stay following liver transplantation. We used univariate and multivariate analyses on 73 635 adult liver transplant recipient data and identified independent recipient and donor risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (>30 days). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing variables. We identified 22 factors as significant predictors of prolonged hospital stay, including the most significant risk factors: intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 1.75, CI 1.58-1.95) and previous transplant (OR 1.60, CI 1.47-1.75). The length of stay (LOS) index assigns weighted risk points to each significant factor in a scoring system to predict prolonged hospital stay after liver transplantation with a c-statistic of 0.75. The LOS index demonstrated good discrimination across the entire population, dividing the cohort into tertiles, which had odds ratios of 2.25 (CI 2.06-2.46) and 7.90 (7.29-8.56) for prolonged hospital stay (>30 days). The LOS index utilizes 22 significant donor and recipient factors to accurately predict hospital length of stay following liver transplantation. The index further demonstrates the basis for a clear clinical recommendation to mitigate risk of long hospitalization by minimizing cold ischemia time., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Uncontrolled EBV infection leading to lymphoproliferative disease is a significant cause of morbidity in pediatric orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Herein, we describe the use of a novel immune assay, which quantifies the lymphocyte immune response and correlates the value to risk for EBV infection., Methods: All patient data were prospectively collected between 2003 and 2005. The study included 18 pediatric liver transplant recipients, seven males and 11 females with a mean follow-up of 47 months post-OLT. Patient EBV load was monitored using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The ATP release (ng/mL) of CD3+ lymphocytes after mitogenic stimulation with phytohemagluttinin (PHA; Cylex Corporation) was used to quantitate patient immune response. Patients were stratified by EBV load: low (<1000 copies/microg DNA), medium (1000-4000 copies/microg DNA), and high (>4000 copies/microg DNA)., Results: Patients with low EBV loads had a significantly (p < 0.04) stronger immune response to PHA than patients with EBV load >1000 copies/microg DNA. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with ATP level <125 ng/mL had 100% probability of an EBV titer >4000 copies/microg DNA, when compared with 22% if the ATP level was between 125 and 400 ng/mL or only 15% if >400 ng/mL (p < 0.05). When immunosuppression was reduced, we observed an increase of the ATP release that correlated with a decrease of the EBV viral load., Conclusion: In conclusion, this study investigates the use of a lymphocyte activation assay to closely measure the immunosuppression status of pediatric liver transplant recipients. Because measurement of EBV DNA load as a single parameter has a poor positive predictive value for development of PTLD, the association of these assays may be of help in the identification of patients at risk for PTLD.

Objective: Currently there are no tests to accurately identify paediatric liver transplant patients at risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Herein we describe the use of cytokine polymorphisms and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load to identify patients at risk for PTLD development., Methods: Between 2001 and 2004, approximately 1047 patient samples were collected for qPCR for EBV in 59 patients. EBV viral load was reported in three groups: low EBV (<4,000 copies/microg DNA), high EBV/no PTLD (>4000 copies/microg DNA) and biopsy-proven PTLD. All 59 patients also had cytokine polymorphism genotyping performed for six cytokine polymorphisms (transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukins (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-2, and interferon (IFN)-gamma) from DNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using qPCR and cytokine polymorphism results. Data are reported as a mean +/- standard error of the mean., Results: There were 35 males and 24 females with a mean follow-up of 34.9 months. EBV viral load had a PPV and NPV of 29 and 95%, respectively. The low IFN-gamma (A/A) polymorphism was found to be present in 4/6 PTLD patients (67%) and only 17/53 (33%) non-PTLD patients. When the low A/A IFN-gamma polymorphism was combined with EBV viral load for prediction of PTLD, PPV and NPV were 57 and 93%, respectively., Discussion: Use of cytokine genotyping in conjunction with qPCR for EBV viral load can significantly improve the predictive value of diagnostic tests for identification of patients at high risk for PTLD.

Malignant hyperthermia is a complication of general anesthesia that is especially problematic if it occurs during renal transplantation because myoglobinemia, shock, and ischemia play a role in injuring the transplanted kidney. In this report, we describe a case of malignant hyperthermia, its clinical course, and the measures taken to successfully treat it and preserve the function of a kidney allograft.