Search

BACKGROUND While expected need for intensive care after lung transplantation (LTx) does not normally affect organ allocation, it would be useful to estimate whether intensive care capacity is limited. The aim of this study was to assess factors available before LTx to identify predictors of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) after LTx. METHODS All bilateral LTx recipients excluding re-transplantation and multi-organ transplantation at Oslo University Hospital from 2000 to 2013 were included (n = 277). Predictive factors for ICU LOS were identified using pre- and perioperative variables. RESULTS Univariate analyses showed that recipients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, young age, female gender, low body height, low pretransplant actual total lung capacity (aTLC), and recipients who received an oversized donor lung were at risk for long ICU LOS. Patients with emphysema had lower risk of long ICU LOS. In multivariate analyses, a lower aTLC (p

Background Cognitive impairment is documented early after heart transplantation (HTx), but we lack data on cognitive function beyond the fourth year post-transplant. Against the background of good long-term survival, this knowledge is necessary to improve clinical care throughout the entire post-transplant period. Methods We assessed cognitive function with a neuropsychological test battery in a sample of HTx recipients ≥16 years post-transplant. To improve clinical utility, we also applied adapted consensus criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Furthermore, we explored sociodemographic and clinical characteristics possibly related to cognitive function. Results Thirty-seven subjects were included 20.3 (±3.8) years after HTx. Mean age was 57.5 (±14.2) years, and 18.9% were women. Up to 38.9% exhibited impaired test performance (ie, performance at least 1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean) on several individual cognitive measures, especially on measures of processing speed, executive functions, memory, and language functions. One subject was diagnosed with dementia, and 30.1% qualified for MCI. Those with MCI had lower hemoglobin than those without. Conclusions A substantial proportion of long-term survivors of HTx might be cognitively impaired. The level of impairment appears comparable to what is defined as MCI in the literature. Modifiable factors related to cognitive impairment might exist.

Organs available for solid organ transplantation are mainly procured from brain dead donors. The inflammation associated with brain death may reduce organ quality and increase organ immunogenicity, thus leading to inferior recipient outcome. We hypothesized that the extensive surgical procedure performed during multiorgan procurement enhances the levels of systemic inflammatory biomarkers. We measured the levels of 27 cytokines and the terminal complement complex (TCC) in plasma samples from brain dead organ donors (n = 34) drawn before and at three specific time points during procurement surgery. Baseline levels of G-CSF, interferon-γ, IL-1ra, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, MCP-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1β, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), regulated upon activation T cell expressed and secreted, and tumor necrosis factor-α were significantly elevated in brain dead donors compared with normal individuals (n = 14), but they were not associated with time on ventilator or any other registered clinical variable. Notably, the secretion of G-CSF, IL1-ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1β, PDGF, and TCC, the latter reflecting ongoing complement activation, increased significantly during surgery. None of the biomarker increases were correlated with operation duration. Multiorgan procurement surgery significantly adds to the inflammatory response revealed by both pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers associated with brain death. Future studies should determine whether this is associated with inferior recipient outcome.

Background Studies have shown conflicting results concerning the occurrence of cognitive impairment after successful heart transplantation (HTx). Another unresolved issue is the possible differential impact of immunosuppressants on cognitive function. In this study, we describe cognitive function in a cohort of HTx recipients and subsequently compare cognitive function between subjects on either everolimus- or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. Methods Cognitive function, covering attention, processing speed, executive functions, memory, and language functions, was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery. Thirty-seven subjects were included (everolimus group: n=20; CNI group: n=17). The extent of cerebrovascular pathology was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Results About 40% of subjects had cognitive impairment, defined as performance at least 1.5 standard deviations below normative mean in one or several cognitive domains. Cerebrovascular pathology was present in 33.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups across cognitive domains. Conclusions Given the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in the sample, plus the known negative impact of cognitive impairment on clinical outcome, our results indicate that cognitive assessment should be an integrated part of routine clinical follow-up after HTx. However, everolimus- and CNI-based immunosuppressive regimens did not show differential impacts on cognitive function.

Although malignancy is a major threat to long-term survival of heart transplant (HT) recipients, clear strategies to manage immunosuppression in these patients are lacking. Several lines of evidences support the hypothesis of an anticancer effect of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs: mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors) in HT recipients. This property may arise from PSI's ability to replace immunosuppressive therapies that promote cancer progression, such as calcineurin inhibitors or azathioprine, and/or through their direct biological actions in preventing tumor development and progression. Given the lack of randomized studies specifically exploring these issues in the transplant setting, a collaborative group reviewed current literature and personal clinical experience to reach a consensus aimed to provide practical guidance for the clinical conduct in HT recipients with malignancy, or at high risk of malignancy, with a special focus on advice relevant to potential role of PSIs.

Limited information exists about acute renal failure (ARF) early after heart transplantation (HTx). We correlated pre-, per-, and post-operative patient and donor parameters to the risk of developing ARF. We also analyzed the consequences of ARF on kidney function after HTx, risk of later need for chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation, and mortality. In a retrospective study from 1983 to 2007, 145 (25%) of 585 HTx recipients developed ARF, defined as ≥ 26.4 micromol/L or ≥ 50% increase in serum creatinine from pre-operatively to the seventh day post-HTx and/or the need of early post-operative dialysis. Independent risk factors for ARF were intravenous cyclosporine immediately post-operatively (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.50, p = 0.02), donor age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.02), and pre-operative cardiac output (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.71, p = 0.003). The development of ARF was a predictor for short-term survival (≤ 3 months) ranging from 98% for patients who improved their creatinine after HTx vs. 79% for those in need of dialysis (p < 0.001). However, ARF did not predict subsequent end stage renal disease in need of dialysis or renal transplantation. ARF is a common complication post-HTx. As ARF is associated with short-term survival, post-operative strategies of preserving renal function have the potential of reducing mortality. Of avoidable risk factors, the use of intravenous CsA should be discouraged.

Limited information exists about acute renal failure (ARF) early after heart transplantation (HTx). We correlated pre-, per-, and post-operative patient and donor parameters to the risk of developing ARF. We also analyzed the consequences of ARF on kidney function after HTx, risk of later need for chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation, and mortality. In a retrospective study from 1983 to 2007, 145 (25%) of 585 HTx recipients developed ARF, defined as ≥ 26.4 micromol/L or ≥ 50% increase in serum creatinine from pre-operatively to the seventh day post-HTx and/or the need of early post-operative dialysis. Independent risk factors for ARF were intravenous cyclosporine immediately post-operatively (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.50, p = 0.02), donor age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.02), and pre-operative cardiac output (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.71, p = 0.003). The development of ARF was a predictor for short-term survival (≤ 3 months) ranging from 98% for patients who improved their creatinine after HTx vs. 79% for those in need of dialysis (p0.001). However, ARF did not predict subsequent end stage renal disease in need of dialysis or renal transplantation. ARF is a common complication post-HTx. As ARF is associated with short-term survival, post-operative strategies of preserving renal function have the potential of reducing mortality. Of avoidable risk factors, the use of intravenous CsA should be discouraged.