Search

Purpose Ranolazine, an inhibitor of late inward sodium current, is an antianginal agent. In this study, the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and tolerability of single- and multiple-dose ranolazine were compared between healthy Korean and white subjects. Methods An open-label, ascending single- and multiple-dose study was conducted with healthy male Korean and white subjects. Subjects were administered 375–750 mg of ranolazine once in a single-dose and twice daily in multiple-dose based on their dose groups. Blood samples for the PK assessment were collected up to 48 h after dosing. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval in Korean to white subjects for Cmax, Cmax,ss, AUClast, and AUC0–12h,ss of ranolazine were calculated. A population PK analysis was also performed. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study. Findings A total of 70 Korean and 48 white subjects completed the study. Ranolazine exposure was similar between Korean and white subjects in all dose groups; however, ranolazine exposure at 750 mg was observed to increase by up to 29% in Korean subjects compared with that in white subjects. On the basis of previous studies, these differences in ranolazine exposure between the 2 ethnic groups may not result in any clinically significant difference. Furthermore, ethnicity was not significantly correlated with the PK properties of ranolazine in the ranolazine PK model. In addition, no significant difference was found in the safety profile of ranolazine between the 2 ethnic groups. Implications The PK properties of ranolazine had no clinically significant difference, and no difference was found in the safety profiles of ranolazine between Korean and white subjects. It is anticipated that ranolazine can be administered in Korean subjects without dose adjustment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02817932.

Fimasartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used to treat hypertension.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fimasartan on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin in healthy volunteers to meet regulatory requirements for drug marketing and labeling in Korea.An open-label, 1-sequence, 2-treatment, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male volunteers. The subjects were administered a single-dose of warfarin 25 mg on day 1. After a 7-day washout period, once-daily fimasartan 240 mg was administered every morning from day 8 to day 16. On day 11, warfarin 25 mg was administered concomitantly with fimasartan. Serial blood samples were collected for 144 hours after each warfarin dose. The plasma concentrations of R- and S-warfarin were analyzed by using HPLC-MS/MS, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by using noncompartmental analysis. The maximal international normalized ratio (INR) and the AUC-INR curve were evaluated to assess warfarin pharmacodynamics. Tolerability was assessed via vital sign measurements, physical examinations, ECGs, clinical laboratory tests, and adverse events.A total of 15 healthy Korean men aged 20 to 39 years (mean [SD], 26.7 [5.1] years) and weighing 60.2 to 85.7 kg (mean, 71.4 [8.3] kg) participated in the study; 12 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs [90% CIs]) of C(max) and AUC(0-last) for R-warfarin were 1.06 (0.97-1.16) and 1.07 (1.03-1.12), respectively. For S-warfarin, the GMRs (90% CIs) of C(max) and AUC(0-last) were 1.02 (0.94-1.11) and 0.99 (0.94-1.04). The INR values reached 1.93 (0.31) and 1.96 (0.37) at 36 hours and decreased to1.2 at 144 hours after warfarin treatment alone and coadministered with fimasartan, respectively. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the maximal INR and AUC-INR curve were 1.01 (0.97-1.05) and 0.98 (0.96-1.01). One (7.7%) of the 13 subjects reported epistaxis during treatment with warfarin alone, and 2 (16.7%) of 12 subjects receiving the combination treatment experienced headache, skin erosion, and an increase in blood creatine phosphokinase. No subjects had an elevated INR4 or reported any symptoms related to hypotension, including fainting or dizziness.Multiple doses of fimasartan did not seem to alter the pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics of warfarin in this small, select population of healthy male volunteers.

HM30181 is an oral P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor developed to enhance the oral bioavailability of P-gp substrate drugs.The objective of this study was to investigate the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of HM30181 after single and multiple oral administrations to healthy Korean male volunteers. The study was performed to meet regulatory criteria for marketing the test product in South Korea.A dose-block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study was performed in 180-, 360-, 600-, and 900-mg single-dose groups and 60-, 180-, and 360-mg multiple-dose groups with 10 subjects (8 active; 2 placebo) per group. In the single-dose study, blood and urine samples were collected for up to 120 hours after drug administration. In the multiple-dose study, subjects received the study drug or placebo orally once daily for 5 days. Blood samples were collected up to 624 hours after the last dose, and up to 24 hours after the first dose to evaluate the accumulation index. Urine samples were collected up to 120 hours after the last dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were collected by the spontaneous reporting of the subjects or when subjects were asked general health-related questions.Thirty and 70 healthy male volunteers completed the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. Mean (SD) age and body weight of subjects in the single administration group were 24.0 (1.8) years and 68.8 (7.4) kg, respectively, and those of the multiple administration group were 24.5 (2.6) years and 67.6 (7.7) kg, respectively. The plasma concentrations peaked at 14 to 42 hours and declined with t(½) of 75.7 to 169.3 hours after single administration, and peaked at 5.5 to 8.0 hours and declined with t(½) of 153.5 to 215.2 hours after multiple administrations. C(max) and area under the concentration curve within dosing intervals (AUC(τ)) increased dose dependently after single administration; however, dose-dependent increases in C(max) and AUC(τ) were not observed after multiple administrations. The fraction of drug excreted unchanged in urine was minimal, with values0.01% in all dose groups. HM30181 accumulated after multiple administrations with an accumulation index of 4.0 to 7.4. All adverse events reported were mild in intensity; there were no serious adverse events reported. The most frequently reported adverse event was gastrointestinal disorder.HM30181 was well tolerated after oral administration within the dose range evaluated, with the exception of the repeated administration of 360 mg, for which gastrointestinal disorders were frequently reported. The systemic exposure of HM30181 was relatively low, and dose proportional properties of HM30181 were not observed.

Background Lobeglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonist with partial PPAR-α affinity, was developed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Objective This study's aim was to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of lobeglitazone to satisfy regulatory requirements for marketing approval in Korea. Methods A block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy subjects. In the pilot study, 4 subjects were administered 0.5 mg, including 1 receiving a placebo. Then, the single-dose study was conducted with 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg doses (8 subjects in each group, including 2 receiving placebos), followed by the multiple-dose study with 1, 2, and 4 mg doses (once daily for 7 days; 8 subjects in each group, including 2 receiving placebos). Serial samples of blood and urine were collected and drug concentrations were determined by high turbulence liquid chromatography-LC/MS/MS. Tolerability assessments were performed throughout the study. Adverse events (AEs) were determined from general health-related questions and self-reports. Results Thirty-six (mean [SD]; age, 23.6 [2.7] years; weight, 70.0 [6.9] kg) and 25 Korean male subjects (age, 23.5 [3.1] years; weight 69.4 [9.4] kg) were enrolled in the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. The data from subjects administered lobeglitazone who completed the study (27, single; 18, multiple) was included in the PK analyses. In the single-dose study, the AUC and C max of lobeglitazone increased with the dose. After repeated dosing for 7 days, the accumulation ratio ranged from 1.1 to 1.4. A total of 25 AEs were reported by 11 (30.6%) and 8 subjects (33.3%) in the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. All AEs were mild in intensity and not serious. Conclusions Lobeglitazone was well tolerated in this small, selected group of healthy male Korean volunteers. The AUC and C max of lobeglitazone increased in a dose-proportional manner from 1 to 4 mg.

Background The combination of glimepiride and metformin is used for glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. A fixed-dose combination of glimepiride/metformin 2/500 mg slow-release (SR) formulation was developed to improve compliance in polymedicated patients. To accommodate the various dosing regimens of glimepiride, a glimepiride/metformin 1/500 mg SR tablet was also developed. Objective The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of SR fixed-dose combinations of glimepiride/metformin 2/500 mg and the newly developed glimepiride/metformin 1/500 mg formulation to meet the regulatory requirements for marketing in Korea. Methods An open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted with healthy male volunteers. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of glimepiride/metformin 1/500 mg SR (test) or glimepiride/metformin 2/500 mg SR (reference) followed by a 1-week washout period and then administration of the alternate treatment. Serial blood samples were collected immediately before and after dosing for 30 hours, and plasma concentrations were determined by using LC-MS/MS with validated methods. Adverse events were assessed by subjects' self-report and interviews addressing general health-related issues. Safety profiles were evaluated throughout the study. Results Thirty-three subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age: 27.9 [4.95] years [range, 21–40 years]). Safety profiles were assessed for all 32 subjects who were administered the study drugs, and pharmacokinetic characteristics were evaluated in the 30 subjects who completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of test to reference for the dose-normalized C max and AUC 0–last of glimepiride were 0.98 (0.90–1.07) and 1.06 (0.98–1.14), respectively. In the case of metformin, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of test to reference for C max and AUC 0–last were 1.06 (0.98–1.15) and 1.04 (0.97–1.12), respectively. Nine adverse events were reported. Among them, loose stool, abdominal pain, and headache were considered to be likely related to the study drug. All reported adverse events were mild in intensity. Conclusions Dose-proportional characteristics of glimepiride and comparable pharmacokinetic properties of metformin were observed between the SR fixed-dose combinations of glimepiride/metformin 1/500 mg and 2/500 mg. A single dose of either treatment was well tolerated, and the safety profiles of the 2 treatments were comparable in this small, selected all-male group of healthy Korean volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00934323.

Background Bicalutamide is an oral nonsteroidal antiandrogenic drug used in the treatment of prostate cancer. A new generic 50-mg tablet formulation of bicalutamide has recently been developed. Objective This study evaluated the relative bioavailability and tolerability of the new generic formulation of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets (test) and the currently marketed formulation (reference) in healthy Korean male subjects. The study was conducted to meet Korean regulatory requirements for authorization to market the generic formulation. Methods This was a randomized-sequence, open-label study in which healthy Korean male subjects (aged 20–55 years) received single doses of the test and reference formulations in a 2-period crossover fashion, with a 6-week washout period between doses. Blood samples for the determination of plasma bicalutamide concentrations were obtained at regular intervals over 672 hours after dose administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Relative bioavailability was evaluated by comparing the log-transformed C max and AUC 0–672 of the 2 formulations; Korean regulatory requirements for the assumption of bioequivalence were met if the 90% CIs fell within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed based on physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and adverse events (AEs) (spontaneously reported or observed by investigators). Results Of 47 volunteers screened for inclusion, 38 were enrolled and 32 completed the study (mean [SD] age, 24.9 [3.7] years; mean height, 173.8 [6.2] cm; mean weight, 66.1 [7.1] kg). Median T max was 24 hours for both formulations. The C max of the test and reference formulations was 1176.2 (191.6) and 1118.9 (209.5) μg/L, respectively. The corresponding values for AUC 0–672 were 277,503 (66,865) and 271,961 (75,597) μg · h/L. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of log-transformed C max and AUC 0–672 were 1.00 to 1.11 and 0.99 to 1.07, respectively. Thirty-three AEs were reported, including 17 events in 9 subjects who received the test formulation and 16 events in 12 subjects who received the reference formulation. All AEs were mild, and no subjects discontinued the study because of AEs. Conclusions In this single-dose study in healthy Korean male subjects, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the new generic formulation of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets did not differ significantly from those of the reference formulation. The new generic formulation met Korean regulatory criteria for the assumption of bioequivalence to the currently marketed formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated. Korea Food and Drug Administration registration number: PSPD 3057.

Objective: This study compared the bioavailability and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of glimepiride/metformin 2/500 mg and glimepiride 2-mg + metformin 500-mg tablets administered separately in healthy Korean subjects. Methods: In this single-dose, open-label, 2-period crossover study, healthy Korean volunteers were randomly assigned to receive, in 1 of 2 randomized sequences, an FDC tablet of glimepiride/metformin 2/500 mg (test) and glimepiride 2-mg + metformin 500-mg tablets administered separately (reference), with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Plasma concentrations of glimepiride and metformin were measured using LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using noncompartmental methods. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean test/reference ratios (GMRs) of the logarithm-transformed C max , AUC from 0 to 30 hours (AUC 0–30 ), and AUC 0−∞ values were within the predetermined regulatory range of 80% to 125%. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination and laboratory analysis. Results: A total of 32 subjects were enrolled (16 men [mean (SD) age, 21.8 (2.7) years (range, 18–26 years); weight, 68.9 (8.3) kg (range, 55.5–85.0 kg)]; 16 women [age, 23.5 (4.5) years (range, 20–38 years); weight, 51.7 (3.5) kg (range, 46.8–58.0 kg)]). The GMRs (90% CI) of glimepiride C max , AUC 0–30 , and AUC 0−∞ were 1.01 (0.91–1.11), 0.98 (0.92–1.03), and 0.97 (0.93–1.04), respectively. For metformin, these values were 0.96 (0.87–1.06), 0.96 (0.90–1.03), and 0.96 (0.90–1.03). A total of 49 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 10 subjects (31.3%) with the FDC and in 13 subjects (40.6%) with the separate tablets. The most commonly reported AEs with the test and reference treatments were dizziness (6 [19%] and 7 [22%]) and sweating (4 [13%] and 7 [22%]), respectively. The severity of all of the AEs was considered to be mild, and there were no significant differences in the prevalences of AEs between the 2 formulations. Conclusions: In this study in healthy Korean subjects, the requirements for bioequivalence of the glimepiride/metformin 2/500-mg FDC and coadministration of separate tablets of each drug were met. Both formulations were generally well tolerated.

Background: Coadministration of glimepiride and metformin has been used to achieve glucose control. Because compliance with a multiple medication regimen can be difficult for some patients, combination tablets of glimepiride + metformin might be a suitable alternative for these patients. Objective: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of test and reference formulations of glimepiride + metformin fixed-dose combination tablets under fasting conditions to meet the regulatory requirements for marketing approval of a new drug in Korea. Methods: This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-way crossover study conducted between March 2007 and May 2007. Healthy fasting Korean men were randomized to 1 of 2 dosing sequences: a single oral administration of a fixed-dose glimepiride 1-mg + metformin 500-mg combination tablet (test) followed by single oral administration of a fixed-dose glimepiride 2 mg + metformin 500 mg combination tablet (reference), separated by a 1-week washout period between doses; or a single oral administration of a fixed-dose glimepiride 2-mg + metformin 500-mg combination tablet followed by single oral administration of a fixed-dose glimepiride 1 mg + metformin 500-mg combination tablet, separated by a 1-week washout period between doses. Serial samples of blood were collected up to 24 hours after oral administration, and drug concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events and changes in clinical parameters. Serious adverse events included those that resulted in death, a life-threatening condition, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Results: A total of 30 healthy male subjects (mean age, 25.6 years [range, 20–36 years]; weight, 69.5 kg [range, 58.2–90.7 kg]) participated in the study. After administration of the test and reference formulations, glimepiride was rapidly absorbed, reaching C max with a median T max of 1.75 and 2.0 hours, respectively, and then declined exponentially with an average t½ of 8.2 and 8.5 hours. The individual C max and AUC last of glimepiride were observed to be proportionally increased according to the administered glimepiride dose. The mean (SD) dose-normalized Cmax values of glimepiride 1 and 2 mg were 168.2 (54.9) and 149.9 (47.4) ng/mL/mg, respectively; the mean dose-normalized AUC last values of glimepiride 1 and 2 mg were 681.5 (190.3) and 635.8 (194.1) ng · h/mL/mg. Individual plots of dose-normalized C max and AUC last values identified a similarity between the 2 groups but no significant between-group differences. A total of 25 adverse events (12 after the test dose and 13 after the reference dose) were reported by 13 of the 30 subjects. All adverse events were considered mild. Twenty-one adverse events were considered related to the study drug (8 after the test dose and 13 after the reference dose). Adverse events believed to be related to the test formulation were diarrhea (4 cases), dizziness (1), headache (1), tingling sensation (1), and weakness (1). Adverse events believed to be related to the reference formulation were diarrhea (6 cases), headache (3), cold sweats (1), dyspepsia (1), epigastric discomfort (1), and lethargy (1). There were no clinically significant findings in the laboratory test results or vital sign monitoring during the study. There were no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions: The C max and AUC last of glimepiride increased proportionally according to the administered glimepiride dose in this study of healthy, fasting Korean men. The safety profiles of the 2 combination tablets were comparable.

Background : LC15-0444 is a selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV under investigation in Korea for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Objective : The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and tolerability profiles of a single dose of LC15-0444 in healthy male subjects. Methods : A dose—block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single-dose, Phase I study was performed in healthy Korean male subjects assigned to receive 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, or 600 mg of LC15-0444 capsules. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 72 hours after administration. Plasma and urine drug concentrations were determined by tandem mass spectrometry coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. DPP IV activity was measured by continuous spectrophotometric assay. An additional food effect study was performed in the 100-mg dose group; changes in PK and PD parameters after highfat diet were evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were detected through investigator inquiries, spontaneous reports, and clinical evaluations such as physical examinations, vital sign measurements, 12-lead electrocardiography, clinical laboratory tests (eg, hematology, blood chemistry, coagulation, urinalysis), and computerized impedance cardiography. Results : Sixty Korean men (mean age, 25.3 years [range, 19-39 years]; weight, 68.3 kg [range, 53.6-84.9 kg]) were enrolled, providing 10 subjects for each dose group. After administration, LC15-0444 reached T max at 0.5 to 5.1 hours, and was eliminated with a t ½ of 16.7 to 21.3 hours. The mean fraction of unchanged drug excreted in urine ranged from 0.21 to 0.34 and mean renal clearance was 15.5 to 23.6 L/h. The dose-normalized AUC exhibited dose-linearity over the range of 50 to 400 mg. All doses of LC15-0444 =200 mg were found to inhibit 80% of DPP IV activity for 24 hours. High-fat diet did not significantly influence the AUC of LC15-0444. LC15-0444 was generally well tolerated. None of the subjects developed any serious clinical or laboratory AEs or discontinued the study due to an AE. All AEs were mild or moderate, and no dose-related trends were observed. Fortysix AEs were reported in 18 subjects (30.0%). AEs considered to be related to the study drug were headache (6 cases), dizziness (2), nausea (1), epistaxis (1), and increased heart rate (1). All AEs resolved spontaneously. Conclusions : A single dose of LC15-0444 exhibited linear PK properties over the range of 50 to 400 mg in these healthy Korean male subjects. PK characteristics were not significantly influenced by food. In addition, doses ≥200 mg of LC15-0444 inhibited plasma DPP IV activity by >80% over a 24-hour dosing interval, and a 600-mg dose increased active glucagon-like peptide-1 levels after a standardized meal. LC15-0444 was generally well tolerated.

Background Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV are a class of oral hypoglycemic agents that increase glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels by inhibiting its degradation. Objective This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of DA-1229, which is a newly developed DPP IV inhibitor. This study was planned as part of a product development project at the request of the Korean regulatory agency. Methods A 7 parallel arm dose-escalation study was conducted in healthy Korean male volunteers. A single oral dose of DA-1229 or placebo was given to 10 subjects (8 active + 2 placebo) in each dose group of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 60 mg. To assess the effects of food, the subjects in the 10-mg dose group received a single dose of DA-1229 10 mg after a high-fat meal, crossing over from the administration of DA-1229 under a fasting state, after a 7-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected up to 120 hours after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analysis and the assessment of DPP IV activity, and blood samples were collected up to 2 hours after each meal until the next morning of drug administration to evaluate active GLP-1, glucose, and insulin levels. Results Seventy-two subjects, aged 20 to 39 years and weighing 52.1 to 79.8 kg, participated in this study. Twenty-one adverse events were reported; all were mild, and all subjects recovered spontaneously. DA-1229 reached a peak at 3.0 to 5.5 hours after a single oral dose and the concentrations declined, with a terminal t½ from 32.5 to 39.8 hours. The %CV of Cmax and AUC0–last ranged from 11.1% to 54.6%. Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics were confirmed within the dose range by using a linear regression analysis, and the 95% CIs of the slope of the log-transformed Cmax and AUC0–last included 1.0. The pharmacokinetics of DA-1229 were unchanged by food. The degree of DPP IV inhibition was dependent on the dose, and groups receiving ≥10 mg exhibited >80% DPP IV inhibition for >24 hours. The %CV of the time of the last quantifiable concentration ranged from 4.6% to 15.2%. Cmax of active GLP-1 was achieved at 30 minutes after meal intake. The active GLP-1 levels were enhanced in groups receiving ≥5 mg. There were no changes in the glucose and insulin levels after DA-1229 administration. Conclusions DA-1229 was well tolerated within the dose range of 1.25 to 60 mg. DA-1229 pharmacokinetics suggested dose proportionality, and dose-dependent DPP IV inhibition was exhibited. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00961025 .

Flecainide acetate is a class Ic antiarrythmic agent that is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 isozyme. A previous open-label, 2-period, single-sequence crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers found differences in the pharmacokinetics of flecainide between subjects with the CYP2D6 wild-type allele and those with the CYP2D6*10 allele, as well as differences in the pharmacokinetic interaction between flecainide and the CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine between genotype groups.This study evaluated QTc-interval changes after administration of a single oral dose of flecainide, with and without paroxetine, in relation to CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism.This was a follow-on to the previous pharmacokinetic study and used data from the same group of healthy Korean male volunteers. Subjects were grouped by CYP2D6 genotype as follows: CYP2D6*1/*1 or CYP2D6*1/*2 (group 1, extensive metabolizers); CYP2D6*1/*10 (group 2, intermediate metabolizers); and CYP2D6*10/*010 or CYP2D6*10/*36 (group 3, poor metabolizers). Flecainide 200 mg was administered on day 1 (period 1); after a 7-day washout period, subjects received paroxetine 20 mg once daily from day 8 to day 14, and flecainide 200 mg on day 15 (period 2). On days 1 and 15, serial 12-lead ECGs were obtained before flecainide dosing and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. Baseline ECGs were obtained at the same time points on days -1 and 14. Machine-read changes in the QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and manually read changes in the QT interval individually corrected using mixed-effects modeling (QTcI) from time-matched baseline were analyzed by genotype and by period (baseline and paroxetine-inhibited state). The QRS duration and JTc interval (QTcF - QRS) were also determined.Twenty-one healthy volunteers (mean [SD] age, 24.5 [3.0] years; mean height, 173.5 [4.6] cm; mean weight, 69.1 [4.5] kg), 7 in each group, were enrolled in and completed the study. In period 1, all genotype groups had significant increases from time-matched baseline in both the QTcF interval (group 1:17.4 milliseconds [90% CI, 9.9-24.9], P0.001; group 2: 11.1 milliseconds [90% CI, 7.9-14.3], P = 0.013; and group 3: 20.5 milliseconds [90% CI, 12.8-28.2], P0.001) and the QTcI interval (group 1:15.4 milliseconds [90 % CI, 8.0-22.9], P = 0.001; group 2: 9.1 milliseconds [90% CI, 6.5-11.8], P = 0.030; and group 3:16.4 milliseconds [90% CI, 9.3-23.5], P = 0.001); the extent of increase did not differ significantly between groups. In groups 1 and 2, the least squares mean difference between period 1 and period 2 was statistically significant for the change in QTcF interval (6.5 milliseconds [90 CI, 3.2-9.8], P = 0.002; and 6.7 milliseconds [90% CI, 3.6-9.7], P = 0.001, respectively) and QTcI interval (6.9 milliseconds [90% CI, 4.1-9.8], P0.001; and 5.8 milliseconds [90% CI, 3.4-8.3], P0.001). In group 3, the least squares mean difference between period 1 and period 2 was statistically significant for the change in QTcI interval (3.9 milliseconds [90% CI, 1.3-6.5], P = 0.015) but not for the change in QT cF interval. The changes in QRS duration did not differ significantly by genotype or period. Consistent with the findings for the QTc interval, the least squares mean difference between period 1 and period 2 was statistically significant for the change in JTc interval in groups 1 and 2 (6.9 milliseconds [90% CI, 3.7-10.2], P = 0.001; and 5.4 milliseconds [90% CI, 2.7-8.2], P = 0.001, respectively) but not in group 3.The extent of drug interaction between flecainide and paroxetine, as reflected in the change in QTc interval (used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker), was influenced by the CYP2D6*10 allele in these healthy Korean male volunteers.

Background: Ginkgo biloba extract is an herbal medicine used in the treatment of vascular disorders that may be coadministered with antiplatelet agents such as ticlopidine. Regulatory authorities requested evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between these entities, according to the drug-development guidance for fixed-dose combination formulations in Korea. Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between ticlopidine and Ginkgo biloba extract. Methods: An open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, single-dose crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male volunteers. All volunteers were randomly assigned to a sequence group for the 2 treatments, which consisted of ticlopidine 250 mg alone and ticlopidine 250 mg with Ginkgo biloba extract 80 mg, separated by a 1-week washout period between the treatments. Bleeding time was determined just before dosing and at 5, 12, and 48 hours after dosing. Platelet aggregation was evaluated before dosing and at 4, 8, 26, and 48 hours after dosing. Blood samples (8 mL) from each of the volunteers were collected from an indwelling intravenous cannula inserted into a forearm vein before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after dosing. Ticlopidine concentrations were determined by a validated method using HPLC and ultraviolet detection. Adverse events were identified using general health-related questions, vital signs, physical examinations, ECGs, and laboratory tests. Results: A total of 24 healthy men participated in the study (mean [SD] age, 24.1 [4.3] years; weight, 66.6 [7.4] kg; height, 174.7 [5.0] cm). The baselinecorrected bleeding times were not significantly different between the ticlopidine-alone and ticlopidine/ Ginkgo biloba groups, and changes in platelet aggregation were not significantly different between the groups. Likewise, the pharmacokinetic parameters of ticlopidine were not significantly different between the groups; the geometric mean ratios of the ticlopidine/ Ginkgo biloba group to the ticlopidine-alone group were 1.03 (90% CI, 0.92–1.16) for C max , 1.08 (90% CI, 0.98–1.19) for AUC 0-last , and 1.10 (90% CI, 1.00–1.20) for AUC 0–∞ . A total of 28 adverse events were reported: 11 in the ticlopidine-alone group and 17 in the ticlopidine/ Ginkgo biloba group. The adverse events judged to be possibly related to ticlopidine in the ticlopidine-alone group were epigastric discomfort (2 cases), diarrhea (1), skin eruption (1), and a feeling of being cold (1) or hot (1). The adverse events judged to be related to ticlopidine or Ginkgo biloba in the ticlopidine/ Ginkgo biloba group were epigastric discomfort (2), diarrhea (2), nausea (2), and headache (1). Conclusions: In this small group of healthy Korean men, the addition of a single dose of Ginkgo biloba extract did not prolong the bleeding time and was not associated with additional antiplatelet effects compared with the administration of ticlopidine alone. The coadministration of Ginkgo biloba extract with ticlopidine was not associated with any significant changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of ticlopidine compared with ticlopidine administered alone.

Background: Mirodenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor reported to be effective in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to the active metabolite N -dehydroxyethyl mirodenafil. Mirodenafil may have drug-drug interactions with ketoconazole and/or rifampicin. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a potent inhibitor (ketoconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) of the CYP3A4 isozyme on the pharmacokinetics of mirodenafil to meet the regulatory requirements for the marketing of mirodenafil in Korea. Methods: An open-label, 1-sequence, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study was conducted over 22 days in healthy Korean male volunteers. Each subject received 100 mg of mirodenafil in each of 3 study periods: mirodenafil alone (period 1); mirodenafil after pretreatment with ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 3 days (period 2); and mirodenafil after pretreatment with rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 10 days (period 3). Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis after the administration of mirodenafil in each study period. Plasma concentration-time data for mirodenafil and its major metabolite, N -dehydroxyethyl mirodenafil, were determined using LC-MS/MS and analyzed by a noncompartmental method. The results for mirodenafil coadministration with either ketoconazole or rifampicin were compared with those for mirodenafil alone. Adverse events (AEs) were identified by asking general health-related questions of the subjects, by physical examination, and by subject self-report throughout the study period. Results: Nineteen subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 23.2 [2.76] years [range, 19–29 years]; weight, 69.3 [6.50] kg [range, 61.0–84.0 kg]; body mass index, 22.4 [1.77] kg/m 2 [range, 20.0–26.0 kg/m 2 ]) and 18 subjects completed the study. One subject discontinued the study due to protocol violation and was replaced. The AUC 0−∞ ) of mirodenafil increased 5.04-fold (90% CI, 3.78–6.72) and the metabolic ratio decreased 0.21-fold after pretreatment with ketoconazole compared with mirodenafil alone. After pretreatment with rifampicin, the AUC0-X) of mirodenafil decreased 0.03-fold (90% CI, 0.02–0.05) and the metabolic ratio increased 2.9-fold. Twelve cases of headache, 6 of nasal congestion, 2 of feeling hot, 2 of epistaxis, and 1 each of dizziness, nausea, and somnolence were considered to be related to administration of mirodenafil. Twenty-eight AEs were reported in period 2 (in 68.4% of subjects), during which systemic exposure to mirodenafil was highest, whereas 7 AEs were reported in period 1 (in 31.6% of subjects) and 5 AEs in period 3 (in 16.7% of subjects). Conclusion: In these healthy Korean male volunteers, the coadministration of ketoconazole and rifampicin resulted in significant changes in systemic exposure to mirodenafil.