Search

Background: Despite the recommendation of coronary physiology to guide revascularization in angiographically intermediate stenoses without established correlation to ischemia, its uptake in clinical practice is slow., Aims: This study aimed to analyze the use of coronary physiology in clinical practice., Methods: Based on a multicenter registry (Fractional Flow Reserve Fax Registry, F(FR) 2 , ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03055910), clinical use, consequences, and complications of coronary physiology were systematically analyzed., Results: F(FR) 2 enrolled 2,000 patients with 3,378 intracoronary pressure measurements. Most measurements (96.8%) were performed in angiographically intermediate stenoses. Out of 3,238 lesions in which coronary physiology was used to guide revascularization, revascularization was deferred in 2,643 (78.2%) cases. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was the most common pressure index used (87.6%), with hyperemia induced by an intracoronary bolus of adenosine in 2,556 lesions (86.4%) and intravenous adenosine used for 384 measurements (13.0%). The route of adenosine administration did not influence FFR results (change-in-estimate -3.1% for regression model predicting FFR from diameter stenosis). Agreement with the subsequent revascularization decision was 93.4% for intravenous and 95.0% for intracoronary adenosine (p = 0.261). Coronary artery occlusion caused by the pressure wire was reported in two cases (0.1%) and dissection in three cases (0.2%), which was fatal once (0.1%)., Conclusions: In clinical practice, intracoronary pressure measurements are mostly used to guide revascularization decisions in angiographically intermediate stenoses. Intracoronary and intravenous administration of adenosine seem equally suited. While the rate of serious complications of wire-based intracoronary pressure measurements in clinical practice seems to be low, it is not negligible., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In patients not suitable for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), several access strategies can be chosen., Aim: To evaluate the use and patient outcomes of transaxillary (TAx), transapical (TA), and transaortic (TAo) as alternative access for TAVI in Germany; to further evaluate surgical cutdown vs. percutaneous TAx access., Methods: All patients entered the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2011 and 2019 who underwent non-transfemoral TAVI were included in this analysis. Patients with TA, TAo, or TAx TAVI were compared using a weighted propensity score model. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed for TAx regarding the percutaneous or surgical cutdown approach., Results: Overall, 9686 patients received a non-transfemoral access. A total of 8918 patients (92.1%) underwent TA, 398 (4.1%) TAo, and 370 (3.8%) TAx approaches. Within the TAx subgroup, 141 patients (38.1%) received subclavian cutdown, while 200 (54.1%) underwent a percutaneous approach. The TA patients had a significantly lower 30-day survival than TAx patients (TA 90.92% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.006; TAo 92.22% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.102). Comparing percutaneous and cutdown TAx approaches, no significant differences were seen. However, more vascular complications occurred (TA 1.8%, TAo 2.4%, TAx 12.2%; p < .001), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (TA 12.9 days, TAo 14.1 days, TAx 12 days; p < .001) after TAx access., Conclusion: It may be reasonable to consider TAx access first in patients not suitable for TF-TAVI, because the 30-day survival was higher compared with TA access and the 1-year survival was higher compared with TAo access. It remains important for the heart teams to offer alternative access modalities for patients not amenable to the standard TF-TAVI approaches., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a recent (≤ 90 days) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at high bleeding risk due to the addition of oral antiplatelet (OAP) agents on top of oral anticoagulants. Data on outcomes of these patients are needed to optimize antithrombotic treatment., Methods: This analysis compared annualized clinical event rates in patients with and without a recent PCI enrolled in ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, a prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial comparing edoxaban and vitamin K antagonists in AF patients after TAVI. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE) and major bleeding., Results: Overall, 132 (94.3%) patients with a recent PCI (n = 140) received OAP after TAVI, compared with 692 (55.9%) patients without a recent PCI (n = 1237). Among patients with a recent PCI on OAP agents, use of dual antiplatelet therapy decreased to 5.5%, and use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) increased to 78.0% over 3 months post-randomization. Conversely, use of SAPT predominated at all time points in patients without a recent PCI history. There were no significant differences in the incidence of NACE or other outcomes assessed, except for major bleeding events, which were more frequent in patients with vs without a recent PCI history (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.17 [1.27, 3.73]; P = 0.005)., Conclusions: Patients with AF undergoing TAVI with a recent PCI have a similar risk of ischemic events and mortality, but an increased risk of major bleeding compared with patients without a recent PCI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Various second-generation transcatheter heart valve (THV) prostheses with high clinical efficacy and safety are available, but there is limited large-scale data available comparing their hemodynamic performance and clinical implications., Objective: To compare the hemodynamic performance and short-term clinical outcome of four second-generation THV prostheses., Methods: 24,124 patients out of the German Aortic Valve Registry who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (Evolut™ R n = 7028, Acurate neo™ n = 2922, Portico n = 878 and Sapien 3 n = 13,296) were included in this analysis. Propensity-score weighted analysis was performed to control for differences in age, left ventricular function, STS score and sex. Primary endpoint was survival at one-year, secondary endpoints were 30 days survival, pre-discharge transvalvular gradients, paravalvular leakage and peri-procedural complications., Results: Thirty-day and one-year survival were not significantly different between the four patient groups. Transvalvular gradients in Evolut™ R and Acurate neo™ were significantly lower as compared to Portico and Sapien 3 at hospital discharge. This difference exists across all annulus sizes. Paravalvular leakage ≥ II occurred significantly less often in the Sapien 3 group (1.2%, p < 0.0001). Rate of severe procedural complications was low and comparable in all groups. Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at one year was lowest in the ACUARATE neo group (13.0%) and highest in the Evolut™ R group (21.9%)., Conclusion: Albeit comparable short-term clinical outcomes there are certain differences regarding hemodynamic performance and permanent pacemaker implantation rate between currently available THV prostheses which should be considered for individual prosthesis selection., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently presented mitral regurgitation (MR), which may interfere with the standard echocardiographic measurements of mean pressure gradient (MPG), flow velocity, and aortic valve area (AVA)., Aims: Herein we investigated the prevalence and severity of MR in patients with severe AS and its role on the accuracy of the standard echocardiographic parameters of AS quantification., Methods: Of all patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement enrolled in the German Aortic Registry from 2011 to 2017, 119,641 were included in this study. The population was divided based on the values of left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] > 50%, LVEF 31-50%, and LVEF ≤ 30%] and AVA (0.80 to ≤ 1.00 cm 2 , 0.60 to < 0.80 cm 2 , 0.40 to < 0.60 cm 2 , and 0.20 to < 0.40 cm 2 )., Results: Overall, 77,890 (65%) patients with mild to-moderate and 4262 (4%) with severe MR were compared with 37,489 (31%) patients without MR. Patients with mild-to-moderate and severe MR presented significantly lower mPG (ΔmPG [95%CI] - 1.694 mmHg [- 2.123 to - 1.265], p < 0.0001 and - 6.954 mmHg [- 7.725 to - 6.183], p < 0.0001, respectively), that increased with LVEF impairment. Conversely, AVA did not differ (severe versus no MR: ΔAVA [95%CI]: - 0.007cm 2 [- 0.023 to 0.009], p = 0.973). Increasing MR severity was associated with significant mPG reduction throughout all AVA strata, causing a low-gradient pattern, that manifested since the early stages of severe AS (LVEF > 50%: AVA 0.80 to 1.00 cm 2 ; LVEF 31-50%: AVA 0.60 to 0.80 cm 2 )., Conclusions: In patients with severe AS, concomitant MR is common, contributes to the onset of a low-gradient AS pattern, and affects the diagnostic accuracy of flow-dependent AVA measurements. In this setting, a multimodality, AVA-centric approach should be implemented. In patients with severe aortic stenosis, concomitant mitral regurgitation contributes to the onset of a low-gradient pattern, warranting a multimodality, and AVA-centric diagnostic approach., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: We compared TAVI vs. SAVR in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) for whom both procedures could possibly be considered (age ≤ 80 years, STS-score 4-8)., Background: According to both ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS recent guidelines, aortic stenosis may be treated with either transcatheter (TAVI) or surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in a subgroup of patients. A shared therapeutic decision is made by a heart team based on individual factors, including chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: Data from the large nationwide German Aortic Valve Registry were used. A propensity score method was used to select 704 TAVI and 374 SAVR matched patients. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Secondary endpoints were clinical complications, including pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, bleeding, and the need for new-onset dialysis., Results: One-year survival was similar (HR [95% CI] for TAVI 1.271 [0.795, 2.031], p = 0.316), with no divergence in Kaplan-Meier curves. In spite of post-procedural short-term survival being numerically higher for TAVI patients and 1-year survival being numerically higher for SAVR patients, such differences did not reach statistical significance (96.4% vs. 94.2%, p = 0.199, and 86.2% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.316, respectively). In weighted analyses, pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and were significantly more common with TAVI; whereas myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, and longer ICU-stay and overall hospitalization were higher with SAVR. Temporary dialysis was more common with SAVR (p < 0.0001); however, a probable need for chronic dialysis was rare and similar in both groups., Conclusion: Both TAVI and SAVR led to comparable and excellent results in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD in an intermediate-risk population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis for whom both therapies could possibly be considered., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Based on the results of several recent randomized trials, European and American guidelines on valvular heart disease management have substantially expanded the indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We present an all-comer data on peri-operative risk profile and in-hospital outcomes from Germany for patients treated by TAVI or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (iSAVR) in 2020, providing an opportunity to compare study data with data from daily clinical practice., Methods: Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2020 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program. Expected mortality was calculated with the annually revised German Aortic valve score (AKL-score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or isolated surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacement in Germany from the previous year (2019)., Results: In 2020 21,903 TAVI procedures (20,810 transvascular (TV; vs. 2019: 22.973; - 9.4%), 1093 transapical (TA; vs. 2019: 1413; - 22.6%)) and 6144 (vs. 2019 7905; - 22.5%) iSAVR were performed in Germany. Patients who received TAVI showed a significantly higher perioperative risk profile than patients undergoing iSAVR based on older age and more severe co-morbidities. While in-hospital mortality after TAVI (2.3%) was numerically lower than in 2019 (2.5%), this difference was not significant (p = 0.11). In-hospital mortality after iSAVR was identical in 2020 and 2019 (2.8%) and thus higher than after TAVI (p = 0.003), resulting in an observed expected mortality ratio of 1.02 after TAVI and 1.05 after iSAVR. After exclusion of the emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (TAVI 2.2% vs. iSAVR 1.9%, p = 0.26)., Conclusion: Total numbers of both iSAVR and TAVI in Germany were lower in 2020 than in 2019, most likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the relative number of patients treated by TAVI as compared to iSAVR continues to increase. Despite older age and more severe comorbidities compared to patients undergoing iSAVR the in-hospital mortality after TAVI continued to decrease in 2020 and remains significantly lower than after iSAVR., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become standard treatment for elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. The ACURATE neo AS study evaluates 30-day and 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 valve., Methods: The primary endpoint of this single-arm multicenter study is 30-day all-cause mortality. Other key endpoints include device performance, echocardiographic measures assessed by an independent core laboratory, and VARC-2 clinical efficacy and safety endpoints through 12 months., Results: The study enrolled 120 patients (mean age 82.1 ± 4.0 years; 67.5% female, mean baseline STS score 4.8 ± 3.8%). The VARC-2 composite safety endpoint at 30 days occurred in 13.3% of patients. All-cause mortality was 3.3% at 30 days and 11.9% at 1 year. The 30-day stroke rate was 2.5% (disabling stroke 1.7%); there were no new strokes between 30 days and 12 months. The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was 15.0% (18/120) at 30 days and 17.8% (21/120) at 1 year. No patients required re-intervention for valve-related dysfunction and there were no cases of valve thrombosis or endocarditis. Patients demonstrated significant improvement in mean aortic valve gradient (baseline 38.9 ± 13.1 mmHg, 1 year 7.8 ± 3.5 mmHg; P < 0.001 in a paired analysis). In the overall population, paravalvular leak was evaluated at 1 year as none/trace in 60.5%, mild in 37.0%, and moderate in 2.5%; no patients had severe PVL., Conclusions: One-year outcomes from the ACURATE neo AS study support the safety and performance of TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 valve., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS)., Background: Chronic dialysis patients undergoing heart valve surgery are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. Whether interventional techniques can reduce this risk is unclear because dialysis patients have thus far been excluded from randomized trials., Methods: Chronic dialysis patients with AS enrolled in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2012 and 2015 were analyzed to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI n = 661) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR n = 457). Propensity scores for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to adjust the comparison of the two treatment groups for potential confounders., Results: TAVI patients were older (78 ± 7.3 vs. 69 ± 10.2 years, p < 0.01, unadjusted) and had more comorbidities. Mortality at 1 year was the same (TAVI: 33.4% vs. SAVR 35.0%, p = 0.72, IPTW-adjusted) while it was lower with TAVI at 30 days (8.6% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.02, IPTW-adjusted). TAVI patients required more pacemaker implantation and showed more aortic regurgitation. SAVR patients required more blood transfusions and had longer hospital stay. Diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, previous PCI, urgent procedure and EuroSCORE were associated with elevated 30-day mortality. Atrial fibrillation and older age were independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in both groups., Conclusions: Chronic dialysis patients with AS undergoing TAVI or SAVR had the same 1-year mortality, although survival at 30 days was better with TAVI. These results suggest that TAVI may improve peri-procedural outcomes.

Aims: Both surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are established options to treat aortic valve stenosis. We present the outcome of the complete cohort of all patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI in Germany during the calendar year 2019., Methods and Results: Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2019 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program: 22,973 transvascular (TV)-TAVI procedures, 7905 isolated SAVR (iSAVR), and 1413 transapical (TA)-TAVI. Data was complete in 99.9% (n = 32,156). In-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.3%) was significantly lower when compared with iSAVR (2.8%, p = 0.007) or TA-TAVI (6.3%; p < 0.001). Expected mortality was calculated with a new version of the German Aortic valve score (AKL Score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacements in Germany in 2018. TV-TAVI and iSAVR both showed lower observed mortality in 2019 than expected based on their respective performance in 2018, yielding an observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratio < 1. This was particularly apparent for patients at low risk. After exclusion of emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.1%) and after iSAVR (2.1%) was identical, even though patients undergoing TV-TAVI showed a considerably higher perioperative risk profile., Conclusion: After excluding emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality of TV-TAVI and iSAVR in 2019 in Germany was identical. In 2019, TV-TAVI and iSAVR both show lower matched mortality ratios compared with 2018, which suggests technical improvements of both therapies.

Aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital admissions for cardiac care have declined. However, effects on mortality are unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period in central Germany on overall and cardiovascular deaths. Simultaneously we looked at catheterization activities in the same region., Methods and Results: Data from 22 of 24 public health-authorities in central Germany were aggregated during the pandemic related lockdown period and compared to the same time period in 2019. Information on the total number of deaths and causes of death, including cardiovascular mortality, were collected. Additionally, we compared rates of hospitalization (n = 5178) for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in 26 hospitals in this area. Data on 5,984 deaths occurring between March 23, 2020 and April 26, 2020 were evaluated. In comparison to the reference non-pandemic period in 2019 (deaths: n = 5832), there was a non-significant increase in all-cause mortality of 2.6% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.06; p = 0.16]. Cardiovascular and cardiac mortality increased significantly by 7.6% (IRR 1.08, 95%-CI 1.01-1.14; p = 0.02) and by 11.8% (IRR 1.12, 95%-CI 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001), respectively. During the same period, our data revealed a drop in cardiac catherization procedures., Conclusion: During the COVID-19-related lockdown a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality was observed in central Germany, whereas catherization activities were reduced. The mechanisms underlying both of these observations should be investigated further in order to better understand the effects of a pandemic-related lockdown and social-distancing restrictions on cardiovascular care and mortality.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of nonagenarians (≥ 90 years) with that of younger (< 90 years) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in current practice., Methods: Data are collected from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY), which was designed to evaluate current practice in the invasive treatment of patients with aortic valve diseases in Germany. Data were analyzed regarding procedural outcome, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes of nonagenarians in comparison to that of younger patients., Results: Between 2011 and 2015, 2436/33,051 (7.3%) nonagenarians underwent TAVI and were included in GARY. Nonagenarians were significantly more often male (45.2% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.001), frail (38.7% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.001), and had higher EuroSCORE scores than younger patient group (23.2% vs. 17.0%). Nonagenarians were significantly less often treated via transapical access (16.3% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001). Procedure was performed significantly less often in general anesthesia (58.2% vs. 60.7%, p = 0.02) in nonagenarians, while necessity of pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in nonagenarians (27.2% vs. 24.8%, p > 0.001). The incidence of other typical postprocedural complications such as severe bleeding events and vascular complications were comparable between groups. However, 30-day (5.2% vs. 3.9%) and 1-year (22.7% vs. 17.7%) mortality rates were significantly higher among nonagenarians and age ≥ 90 years could be identified as an isolated risk factor for mortality., Conclusion: TAVI is a highly standardized procedure that can be performed safely with high procedural success even in very old patients. Although mortality is significantly higher in these patients-most probably due to the intrinsic higher risk profile of the very old patients-the results are still acceptable. To optimize outcome, especially elderly patients seem to profit from a procedure under local anesthesia or conscious sedation, to minimize the rate of postoperative delirium and the length of stay and to facilitate early mobilization.

Aims: To examine the clinical experience and practical use of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and to report some of the first clinical results., Methods and Results: A total of 18 consecutive patients with severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) were included in this German multicentre registry. All patients underwent clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory assessment prior to the PASCAL procedure and before hospital discharge. MR was classified as functional in 6 patients, degenerative in 2, and combined in 10. All except one received a single PASCAL implant. The preprocedural severe MR present in all patients was reduced: grade 0 in 4 (22.2%), grade I in 11 (61.1%), grade II in 3 (16.7%). The v-wave was significantly reduced from 31.7 ± 9.5 to 18 ± 7.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). Independent leaflet capture, performed in 4 (22.2%) of the patients, wide clasps, and the 10-mm central spacer are features of the PASCAL device to optimize mitral leaflet repair. There were no periprocedural complications., Conclusion: PASCAL is a safe and effective mitral valve repair device for the treatment of severe MR. Device-specific features allow valve repair tailored to the individual anatomy of the underlying mitral pathology in each patient.

Background: Within the last years TAVI-especially transfemoral/transvascular TAVI-has proven to be a valuable therapeutic option for most patients suffering from AS. Here, we present the outcome of a complete dataset of all patients undergoing aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2018., Methods: The data of all aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2018 derive from the mandatory nationwide quality control program. Patients were stratified with a new version of the German Aortic valve score (AKL Score) divided in different risk stratification depending on the treatment with either a catheter based (TV-TAVI) or surgical (iSAVR) approach. In-hospital outcomes have been compared between the two approaches., Results: 19,317 transvascular (TV)-TAVI procedures were carried out. In contrast to this steady growth, the number of iSAVR andtransapical (TA) -TAVI procedures declined. In-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.5%) was lower when compared to iSAVR (3.1%) as well as TA-TAVI (5.7%) in-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI was significantly lowest (Fig. 2) with an in-hospital mortality rate of 2.5%. TV-TAVI was the only approach with an observed vs. expected mortality ratio < 1 according to the used risk prediction model., Conclusion: TV-TAVI is more often performed and shows lower in-hospital mortality than iSAVR. TV-TAVI has replaced iSAVR as the gold-standard concerning in-hospital outcome in aortic stenosis management.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is emerging as the standard of care for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Recent results have been favourable even for patients with low periprocedural risk., Methods: We analysed the number of procedures, complications, and in-hospital mortality rates of all patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement in 2017 in Germany, focussing especially on transvascular (TV) TAVI. Patients were stratified according the German Aortic Valve Score (AKL) into the risk classes low, intermediate, high and very high (≥ 10%)., Results: A total of 17,956 TV-TAVI and 9011 isolated surgical aortic valve replacements (iSAVR) were performed in Germany in 2017. Although the total rate of intraprocedural complications after TV-TAVI was the same as in 2016 (both 7.4%), fewer patients experienced an arterial vascular complication in 2017 (2017: 6.0%; 2016: 7.1%; p < 0.001). Likewise, the rate of new pacemaker implantation decreased (2017: 9.6%; 2016:11.4%; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI and iSAVR was equal (2.7%) in 2017, despite the much higher risk profile of TV-TAVI patients. Using the AKL score as reference, TV-TAVI showed a more favourable observed-to-expected mortality (O/E) ratio (0.89) than iSAVR (1.14)- even more pronounced in patients at low risk (0.81 vs. 1.14)., Conclusions: The rates of major complications like bleeding and permanent pacemaker implantation after TV-TAVI keep declining. In 2017 patients undergoing TV-TAVI had a low in-hospital mortality rate with an O/E ratio < 1, indicating that the results were again better than those of all TAVI and SAVR of the previous year. Overall in-hospital mortality after transvascular TAVI and isolated aortic valve repair 2017 in Germany stratified to risk groups by the German Aortic Valve Score (German AV Score/AKL Score): low risk group (AKL 0- < 3%), intermediate risk group (AKL 3- < 6%), high risk group (AKL 6- < 10%) and very high risk group (AKL ≥ 10%).

Aims: The 2015 Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey showed a low knowledge and awareness about heart valve disease in the general population despite its high prevalence and morbidity. The 2017 survey was conducted to re-evaluate concern and knowledge about heart valve disease after 2 years of rapidly increasing patient numbers presenting with heart valve disease., Methods and Results: A total of 12,820 people aged 60 years or older in 11 European countries took part in the survey. While the number of people concerned most about heart valve disease increased significantly (2015:1.7% vs. 2017:2.1%; p < 0.001), it is still very low compared to cancer (28.8%) or Alzheimer's disease (20.9%). More people claim to be familiar with heart valve disease in general (2015: 17.1% vs. 2017: 20.0%; p < 0.001) and the majority claims to know of at least one therapy for heart valve disease (61.9%). Nevertheless, only 3.8% could correctly identify aortic stenosis (AS), which is significantly less than in 2015 (7.2%; p < 0.001). As before, the majority of the respondents claimed to rarely or never undergo a stethoscope check from their general practitioner (2015: 54.2% vs. 2017: 50.6%, p < 0.001); nevertheless, a positive trend can be seen. People wish heart valve disease to be part of regular checks by the general practitioners., Conclusion: The general population's knowledge of heart valve disease in general slightly increased over the last 2 years. However, detailed understanding of aortic stenosis and its treatment options is still low, as is the level of concern shown for heart valve disease. Nevertheless, the general population cites heart valve disease as a condition they wish to be checked for regularly.

The first and last names of all authors were interchanged in the original publication.

Aims: Approximately every fifth patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) requires a permanent pacemaker (PPM) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse predictors of atrioventricular block III° (AVBIII) persistence with concurrent PPM dependency after TAVI., Methods and Results: Between 2010 and 2015 a total of 1198 patients underwent TAVI at the Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Germany. After exclusion of patients with prior PPM (n = 173) 14.7% (n = 176) of the patients underwent PPM implantation after the procedure. Independent predictors of PPM implantation were pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB, p < 0.001) and implantation of a CoreValve prosthesis (p < 0.001). A subgroup of patients with a newly implanted PPM (n = 102) were followed-up for a median of 73 (IQR 62-85) days. The leading indication for PPM implantation was AVBIII in 74.5% (76/102). Of these patients only 22.4% (17/76) had persistent AVBIII at follow-up. Predictors of AVBIII persistence were prior RBBB (p = 0.04), postdilatation (p = 0.006) and higher mean aortic valve gradient prior to implantation (p = 0.013). PPMs were implanted earlier in patients with persisting AVBIII [1 day (IQR0-2.5) vs. 4 days (IQR2-7); p < 0.001]. Early PPM implantation after TAVI was the only independent predictor of persistent AVBIII [OR 1.36 (95% 1.05-1.75); p = 0.02]., Conclusion: The long-term persistence of AVBIII is generally low after TAVI. Therefore, it may be wise to postpone the indication for PPM implantation for a couple of days. The only predictors of a lack of recovery of the AVB are prior RBBB, higher mean aortic valve gradients and postdilatation of the prosthesis.

Background: Device landing zone (DLZ) calcification is an important determinant of procedural success in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Objective: To evaluate the impact of DLZ calcification on procedural outcome with different types of transcatheter heart valves (THVs)., Methods: Aortic valve calcium density (AVC dens ) was determined by non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography in 1232 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. We stratified the outcome data according to the extent of AVC dens (mild, moderate, severe) and compared balloon-expandable (BE) with self-expanding (SE) THV. Moreover, THVs were subdivided according to their radial force (BE: high; SE mod : moderate; SE low : low)., Results: With BE THV, PVR ≥2° (2.1 vs. 7.9%; p < 0.001), post-dilatation (12.3 vs. 36.6%; p < 0.001), malpositioning (8.4 vs. 13.0%; p = 0.01), device embolization (0.4 vs. 2.6%; p = 0.004), and the need for a second valve (1.2 vs. 3.6%; p = 0.01) were less frequent than with SE devices, but mean transaortic gradients at discharge were higher [12.0 mmHg (8.0-15.0) vs. 9.0 mmHg (6.0-11.0); p < 0.001], and aortic root injury was more frequent (2.7 vs. 0.8%; p = 0.01). In cases of severe calcification, differences between BE and SE THV regarding PVR, post-dilatation, and hemodynamics were mostly pronounced, followed by patients with moderate AVC dens . In cases with low AVC dens , the best outcomes with respect to PVR, pacemaker implantation, and hemodynamics were achieved with SE low THV., Conclusions: In severe and moderate DLZ calcification, BE devices may have advantages, whereas in mild DLZ calcification, SE low THV showed the most favorable profile.

Aims: Recent randomized trials have documented the superiority of TAVR-particularly via transfemoral access-over SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis considered to have a high or intermediate operative risk of death. We sought to assess in-hospital outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low risk of operative mortality undergoing routine surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods and Results: We performed a propensity-score matched comparison of all patients undergoing first-time treatment by SAVR or transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) in 2014 in Germany who had a logistic EuroSCORE (logES) ≤ 10%, considered to reflect low surgical risk. The primary endpoint of our analysis was in-hospital mortality. Of 7624 SAVR and 9969 TF-TAVR procedures, 6844 (89.8%) and 2751 patients (27.6%), respectively, were considered low risk with a logES between 1.505 and 10.0%. Matching yielded 805 TF-TAVR/SAVR patient pairs with identical propensity scores and no difference in pertinent baseline characteristics, except for the logES, which was significantly higher in TF-TAVR patients (6.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.2 ± 1.3% in SAVR patients, P < 0.001). Observed in-hospital mortalities were 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.0%) in SAVR and 2.0% (1.3-3.3%) in TF-TAVR patients (P = 0.85)., Conclusion: Our finding of no difference in in-hospital mortality in propensity-score matched low-surgical-risk patients treated by SAVR or TF-TAVR in a routine clinical setting indicates that TF-TAVR can be offered safely to individual patients, despite their operative risk being low. This finding needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Aims: We analysed the number of procedures, indications, and in-hospital mortality rates of all patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) or transvascular (TV-) and transapical (TA-) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from 2012 to 2015 in Germany., Methods and Results: More than 31,000 aortic valve procedures were performed in 2015 in Germany, representing a total increase of 4.5% over 2014. TV-TAVI accounts for 13,108 of these procedures, with an increase of 21%, whereas the numbers of isolated sAVR and TA-TAVI decreased slightly. Age, frailty, high risk, and patients' choice were the main reasons for a catheter-based intervention. In 2015, the in-hospital mortality rate after TV-TAVI decreased to 3.4%, approaching that of sAVR (2.9%), despite a considerably higher baseline risk. A stratified analysis according to the German aortic valve (AKL) score demonstrated a further decrease of the in-hospital mortality for TV-TAVI, showing a lower in-hospital mortality rate than expected in all risk groups. Importantly, this also accounts for the lowest risk group with an AKL score <3% showing an in-hospital mortality rate of 1.7%, which is now comparable to that of sAVR (1.5%). In all other risk groups, the in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing TV-TAVI was lower than in patients undergoing sAVR., Conclusions: Mortality after TV-TAVI keeps decreasing over the last years and equals that of SAVR in the lowest risk cohort in the meanwhile. All TV-TAVI patients have significantly lower observed than expected mortality, which will further lead to a redefinition of standard of care.

Aims: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is recommended for annular sizing prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but it remains unclear whether systolic or diastolic reconstructions should be used and whether the effective annular diameter should be derived by area or perimeter. In this study these different approaches were compared with intraoperative sizing., Methods: In 52 patients who were evaluated but deemed unsuitable for TAVI, the annulus was measured during conventional surgery using metric sizers (AnnOp) and compared with MSCT measurements (cross-sectional diameter derived by area [AnnAsys, AnnAdia; AnnAmean = (AnnAsys + AnnAdia)/2] and perimeter (AnnPsys, AnnPdia) in systole and diastole). Furthermore, TAVI was simulated based on AnnOp and the impact of the various MSCT approaches on sizing strategy was determined., Results: The best agreement with AnnOp [mean difference (limits of agreement)] was shown for AnnAmean [0.03 mm (-1.9 to 1.96)], whereas the strongest deviation was noted for AnnPsys [-1.08 mm (-3.01 to 0.86)]. Mean differences between systole and diastole were significant but small: 0.82 mm (3.5 %) for area- and 0.81 mm (3.3 %) for perimeter-derived measurements. Simulation of TAVI revealed the least change of strategy for AnnAmean (76.9 %) as compared with AnnPsys (53.8 %); between AnnAsys and AnnAdia sizing would have been deviant in 17.3 % due to relatively large intraindividual cyclic differences., Conclusions: AnnAmean demonstrated the best agreement with AnnOp, whereas perimeter-derived measurements were somewhat overestimated. Despite a negligible average difference between systolic and diastolic annular values, in a subset of patients the intraindividual cyclic variability was relatively large and potentially of clinical impact.

Objective: Patients with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction are characterized by exertional dyspnoea. Heart rate (HR) reduction by β-blockers can improve exercise tolerance by prolonging LV filling, but their negative inotropic and lusitropic properties can be detrimental in this disease. We tested the effects of administering ivabradine, a HR-lowering drug without impact on cardiac kinetics that may favorably affect diastolic function., Methods: Twenty-four patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal LV ejection fraction on chronic β-blocker therapy were included. NT-proBNP serum levels were determined prior to and after cardiopulmonary exercise. β-Blockers were then replaced by ivabradine and patients were re-tested after 6 weeks. Patients were initially classified as having a low (E/e' ≤ 8; n = 11) or high (E/e' > 8; n = 13) LV filling index., Results: E/e' significantly decreased during ivabradine therapy in patients with high E/e' (10.7 ± 2.9 vs. 8.9 ± 1.7; p < 0.01), whereas no difference occurred in patients with low E/e' (6.4 ± 0.7 vs. 6.5 ± 1.1; p = ns). With ivabradine, patients with high E/e' had an increased oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (from 10.8 ± 1.4 to 11.8 ± 1.9 ml/min/kg; p < 0.05) and a steeper slope of the initial oxygen pulse curve (from 293 ± 109 to 359 ± 117 µl/beat/kg/W; p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with high E/e' had lower NT-proBNP serum levels at rest (169 ± 207 vs. 126 ± 146 pg/ml; p < 0.05) and after exercise (190 ± 256 vs. 136 ± 162 pg/ml; p < 0.05) during ivabradine therapy., Conclusions: In patients with CAD and elevated E/e', switching therapy from β-blockers to ivabradine may cause a reduction in LV filling pressures and an improved stroke volume response to exercise.

Background: Transvascular (TV-AVI) or transapical (TA-AVI) aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment option for patients with aortic stenosis being at high or prohibitive risk for surgical aortic valve implantation (SAVR). Randomized data demonstrated that these subgroups can safely been treated with TAVI. However, a comparison of SAVR and TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is missing. Therefore, the aim of the analysis was to compare TAVI and SAVR in all patients who were treated for aortic valve stenosis in Germany throughout 1 year., Methods: The mandatory quality assurance collects data on the in-hospital outcome from all patients (n = 20,340) undergoing either SAVR or TAVI in Germany. In order to compare the different treatment approaches patients were categorized into four risk groups using the logistic EuroScore I (ES). In-hospital mortality and peri- and postprocedural complications were analyzed., Results: The in-hospital mortality did not differ between TV-AVI and SAVR in the low risk group (ES <10 %: TV-AVI 2.4 %, SAVR 2.0 %, p = 0.302) and was significantly higher for SAVR in all other risk groups (ES 10-20 %: TV-AVI 3.5 %, SAVR 5.3 %; p = 0.025; ES 20-30 %: TV-AVI 5.5 %, SAVR 12.2 %, p < 0.001; ES >30 %: TV-AVI 6.5 %, SAVR 12.9 %, p = 0.008). TA-AVI had a significantly higher mortality in all risk groups compared to TV-AVI. In comparison to SAVR, TA-AVI had a higher mortality in patients with ES <10, comparable mortality in ES 10-20 %, and lower mortality in patients with an ES >20 %. The overall stroke rate was 2.3 %. It occurred more frequently in patients with an ES <10 % treated with a transapical approach (SAVR 1.8 %, TV-AVI 1.9 %, TA-AVI 3.1 %, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in all other comparisons., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TAVI provides excellent outcomes in all risk categories. Compared with SAVR, TV-TAVI yields similar in-hospital mortality among low-risk patients and lower in-hospital mortality among intermediate and high-risk patient populations.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an important treatment option for elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis whose risk is too high or prohibitive for conventional surgery. Despite notable progress during the past decade, continuous efforts directed at further improvement of procedural safety and performance are required, especially considering expanding indications for interventional treatment options among lower-risk populations. One issue that needs to be addressed is myocardial damage, which can frequently be observed after TAVI and has been linked to worse prognosis. Yet, knowledge concerning the underlying mechanisms and clinical impact remains scarce, and further investigation in this field is warranted. In this review, we provide a contemporary summary of the types of myocardial injury associated with TAVI, including access-related injury, mechanical trauma and ischemia, the role of myocardial biomarkers, and the impact on left ventricular function, with emphasis on potential mechanisms and clinical implications.

Background: Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) represents a safe and effective treatment option for certain patients with resistant hypertension and has been shown to decrease sympathetic activity. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter that is co-released with norepinephrine and is up-regulated during increased sympathetic activity. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of RSD on NPY and to analyze the association between changes in NPY levels and blood pressure reduction after RSD., Methods: A total of 150 consecutive patients (age 64.9 ± 10.2 years) from three clinical centers undergoing RSD were included in this study. Response to RSD was defined as an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction of >10 mmHg 6 months after RSD. Venous blood samples for measurement of NPY were collected prior to and 6 months after RSD., Results: BP and NPY levels were significantly reduced by 23/9 mmHg (p = 0.001/0.001) and 0.24 mg/dL (p < 0.01) 6 months after RSD. There was a significant correlation between baseline SBP- and RSD-related systolic BP reduction (r = -0.43; p < 0.001) and between serum NPY baseline values and NPY level changes (r = -0.52; p < 0.001) at the 6-month follow-up. The BP response to RSD (>10 mmHg) was associated with a significantly greater reduction in NPY level when compared with BP non-responders (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates an effect of RSD on serum NPY levels, a specific marker for sympathetic activity. The association between RSD-related changes in SBP and NPY levels provides further evidence of the effect of RSD on the sympathetic nervous system.

Objective: Since the beginning of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era, many prosthetic valves have entered clinical practice. TAVI prostheses differ regarding stent design and some may potentially interfere with diagnostic or interventional catheters. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the feasibility of coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with prior TAVI., Methods: From 2011 to 2014, 1,000 patients were treated by TAVI at our center using eight different valve prostheses (Symetis ACURATE TA and ACURATE TF; Medtronic CoreValve and Engager; JenaValve, SJM Portico; Edwards Lifesciences SAPIEN and SAPIEN XT). In this analysis, all patients were included who underwent either CA or PCI after TAVI. CA or PCI were rated as fully feasible when coronary ostia could be fully intubated, partially feasible when coronary arteries could be displayed only unselectively or unfeasible when coronary arteries could not be displayed., Results: A total of 35 patients underwent CA/PCI after TAVI at our hospital. In all patients with valves implanted in a subcoronary position (SAPIEN n = 19; JenaValve n = 1), selective intubation was feasible using standard catheters. Out of 15 patients with valve types that are placed over the coronary ostia (CoreValve n = 10, ACURATE n = 4, Portico n = 1), selective intubation of coronary arteries was not possible in 9 cases, even with the use of different diagnostic catheters. Full accessibility was possible only in 3 cases. In 2 cases, display of the right CA was only feasible using unselective aortography. In 1 case, coronary arteries could not be displayed at all immediately after a valve-in-valve procedure., Conclusion: CA or PCI after TAVI is usually feasible. Devices that are placed in a partially supracoronary position, however, can interfere with diagnostic or guiding catheters and impede straightforward intervention, especially when the prosthesis is not implanted in the correct position.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Background: The diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection of CAD in patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI has thus far not been validated., Methods: A consecutive series of 475 patients (194 male, mean age: 82 ± 6 years) with CTA data sets obtained during the routine diagnostic work-up before TAVI were included. A total of 6,603 coronary segments in 1,899 coronary arteries ≥ 1.5 mm in diameter and 271 grafts were evaluated for the presence of significant CAD defined as ≥ 50% luminal narrowing. Results were compared with invasive coronary angiography as the standard of reference., Results: Prevalence of significant CAD was 57% (270/475), and 5,925 coronary segments (90%) and 257 bypass grafts (95%) were evaluable by CTA. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity (Se), specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV) were 98, 37, 67 and 94%, respectively. CTA showed satisfactory ability to exclude significant CAD in the following subgroups: (1) patients (221/475) without prior known CAD (Se: 97%, NPV: 97%), (2) patients (13/475) without prior known CAD and absent coronary calcification (NPV: 100%) and (3) bypass grafts (Se: 97%, NPV: 99%)., Conclusions: Comprehensive evaluation of a pre-TAVI CTA could prove to be a useful rule-out test for significant CAD in selected subgroups of patients.

Background: Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) represents a potential treatment option for certain patients with resistant arterial hypertension (HT). HT is associated with chronic vascular inflammation and remodeling, contributing to progressive vascular damage, and atherosclerosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of RSD on cardiovascular inflammation and remodeling by determining serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)., Methods: A total of 60 consecutive patients (age 67.9 ± 9.6 years) undergoing RSD were included. A therapeutic response was defined as an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction of >10 mmHg 6 months after RSD. Venous serum samples for measurement of hsCRP, IL-6, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 were collected prior to and 6 months after RSD., Results: A significant reduction in office SBP of 26.4 mmHg [SBPbaseline 169.3 mmHg (SD 11.3), p < 0.001] was documented 6 months after RSD. The serum levels of hsCRP (p < 0.001) and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (p < 0.001) were significantly decreased compared to baseline values. The levels of MMP-9 (p = 0.024) and MMP-2 (p < 0.01) were significantly increased compared to baseline values., Conclusion: In addition to the effective blood pressure reduction in response to RSD, this study demonstrates a positive effect of RSD on biomarkers reflecting vascular inflammation and remodeling. These results suggest a possible prognostic benefit of RSD in high-risk patients for endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular remodeling as well as end-organ damage.

Aims: This analysis from the German Mitral Valve Registry investigates the impact of the learning curve with the MitraClip(®) technique on procedural success and complications., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients treated since 2009 in centers that performed more than 50 transcatheter mitral repairs were included. Results of the first half of the patients were compared to those of the second. Altogether 496 patients from 10 centers were included. Patients treated later had less common severe heart failure symptoms (patients with NYHA IV: 22.1 vs. 14.5 %, p < 0.05). The EuroSCORE I (22.0 vs. 23.0 %, p = ns) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (7.5 vs. 9.5 %, p = ns) did not differ between both groups. Procedural success was 95.6 % (238/249) in the first cases and 94.7 % (232/245, p = ns) subsequently. Also procedural time (104.3 vs. 119 min, p = ns) and complications did not decrease over time., Conclusion: A learning curve using the MitraClip(®) device does not appear to significantly affect acute MR reduction, hospital and 30-day mortality. Most likely, the proctor system leads to already high initial procedure success and relatively short procedure time.

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly common procedure in elderly and multimorbid patients with aortic stenosis. We aimed at developing a pre-procedural risk evaluation scheme beyond current surgical risk scores., Methods: We developed a risk algorithm for 1-year mortality in two cohorts consisting of 845 patients undergoing routine TAVI procedures by commercially available devices, mean age 80.9 ± 6.5, 51 % women. Clinical variables were determined at baseline. Multivariable Cox regression related clinical data to mortality (n = 207 deaths)., Results: To account for variability related to age and sex and by enrolment site we forced age, sex, and cohort into the score model. Body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, pulmonary hypertension, mean transvalvular gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline were most strongly associated with mortality and entered the risk prediction algorithm [C-statistic 0.66, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.70, calibration χ (2)-statistic = 6.51; P = 0.69]. Net reclassification improvement compared to existing surgical risk predication schemes was positive. The score showed reasonable model fit and calibration in external validation in 333 patients, N = 55 deaths (C-statistic 0.60, 95 % CI 0.52-0.68; calibration χ (2)-statistic = 16.2; P = 0.06). Additional measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin I did not improve the C-statistic. Frailty increased the C-statistic to 0.71, 95 % CI 0.65-0.76., Conclusions: We present a new risk evaluation tool derived and validated in routine TAVI cohorts that predicts 1-year mortality. Biomarkers only marginally improved risk prediction. Frailty increased the discriminatory ability of the score and needs to be considered. Risk algorithms specific for TAVI may help to guide decision-making when patients are evaluated for TAVI.

Background: Prior studies suggest that β-blockers lead to increased pulse wave reflections, thereby negating the blood pressure lowering effects on cardiovascular mortality. Parts of these effects may be induced by the heart rate reduction under β-blockade. The aim of this study was to unmask heart rate-independent effects of β-blockade on pulse wave reflections by switching therapy from β-blockers to ivabradine, an I f channel inhibitor without impact on systemic hemodynamics., Methods: 14 male patients (age 61 ± 3 years, LVEF 62 ± 1 %) with arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) under chronic β-blocker therapy at moderate dosage and additional renin-angiotensin system-blocking therapy were included. We determined radial augmentation index (rAI) by radial applanation tonometry in patients under β-blockade both at rest and during early recovery after exercise. β-Blockers were then replaced by ivabradine. Six weeks later, patients were re-tested at rest and after exercise under ivabradine therapy., Results: Mean heart rate (68 ± 3 vs. 63 ± 3 bpm; p = ns) and resting mean arterial pressure (98 ± 2 vs. 98 ± 2 mmHg; p = ns) were not different between β-blocker or ivabradine therapy, respectively. The rAI remained unchanged after switching therapy from β-blocker to ivabradine (86 ± 2 vs. 84 ± 4 %; p = ns). Post exercise, the rAI revealed an identical decrease in both groups (-7.2 ± 2.4 vs. -5.4 ± 2.5 %, p = ns). The increase in heart rate between resting conditions and early recovery post exercise was inversely correlated with the decrease of rAI under β-blockade (r = -0.70; p < 0.01) and showed a trend towards correlation under ivabradine (r = -0.52; p = 0.07)., Conclusion: In men at the age of 60 years and CAD, β-blockade does not exert heart rate-independent, pleiotropic effects on peripheral pulse wave reflections, both at rest or after exercise. Our results fit well within recent studies, demonstrating the fundamental influence of heart rate on rAI.

Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BVS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: According to the current guidelines, drug-eluting stents are the treatment of choice in patients with STEMI. BVS represents a new technology capable to restore the native vessel vasomotion and potentially avoiding long-term limitations such as stent thrombosis., Methods: From October 2012 to May 2013, patients with evidence of STEMI eligible for BVS implantation were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were not defined., Results: A total of 25 patients, respectively 31 lesions, were treated. Procedural success was achieved in 97%. Two major adverse cardiac events occurred during hospitalization and follow-up: one patient with cardiogenic shock at the index procedure subsequently died. One patient suffered from instable angina with need for interventional revascularization of a previously untreated vessel. One target vessel failure as a consequence of an intra-procedural dissection was seen. However, no target lesion failure was noted. During 132.7 ± 68.7 days of follow-up none of the patients died., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that implantation of BVS in STEMI patients is feasible in this small cohort of highly selected patients. Further evaluation in randomized-controlled trials is needed.

Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors of mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) undergoing in-hospital extracorporeal life support system (ECLS) treatment., Methods: We retrospectively studied the characteristics and clinical outcomes of 28 patients (January 2010 and December 2011) with OHCA and veno-arterial ECLS implemented during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) upon admission to the cath lab. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined after ECLS implantation and then every 24 h during and after successful weaning from ECLS., Results: Overall 30-day survival rate was 39.3 % (11 of 28 patients). Baseline characteristics, initial laboratory measurements, and LVEF on admission were not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. There was no difference regarding median CPR duration [survivors 44.0 min (IQR 31.0-45.0) vs. non-survivors 53.0 min (IQR 40.0-61.3); P = 0.23]. Door-to-ECLS implantation time was significantly longer in non-survivors [42.5 min (IQR 28.0-56.5) vs. 25.0 min (IQR 21.0-30.0); P < 0.01]. ECLS treatment duration was not significantly different between the two groups [survivors: 4.0 days (IQR 1.5-7.5) vs. non-survivors 6.5 days (IQR 1.0-8.0); P = 0.69]. LVEF significantly improved in survivors during ECLS treatment (mean ± SD survivor 47.5 ± 14.7 % vs. non-survivor 23.3 ± 14.9 %; P < 0.01). The door-to-ECLS implantation time was the only significant and independent predictor of 30-day mortality in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a benefit favouring patients with a door-to-ECLS implantation time <30 min (log rank 6.29; P = 0.01)., Conclusion: A door-to-ECLS implantation time <30 min significantly improves 30-day outcomes in patients with OHCA.

Introduction: Left ventricular (LV) thrombi carry a high risk of embolization. Therapeutic recommendations like treatment with low molecular heparin and intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy have failed to reach a consensus., Case Description: A 56-year-old female patient presented in cardiogenic shock to the emergency department. Echocardiography demonstrated a dilated LV with a severely depressed global systolic function and a large LV apical thrombus. Treatment with UFH was initiated as well as a treatment with catecholamines for stabilizing the patient's hemodynamic situation. On the follow-up echocardiographic examination, extensive free-floating parts of the thrombus could be documented. Given the high risk of embolization in a now hemodynamically stable situation, emergency surgical embolectomy was performed., Discussion: A conservative procedure might be useful for bridging till surgical treatment is available and/or the risk due to surgery is acceptable., Conclusion: In absence of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of LV thrombi, individualized management options concerning surgical, embolization and bleeding risk must be taken into account.

Objective: In the aftermath of myocardial infarction, increased loading conditions will trigger hypertrophy of viable myocardium. This in turn causes deterioration of regional contractility. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) allows the exact differentiation of viable and infarcted myocardium and therefore the measurement of regional wall thickness and function. Bone marrow-derived stem cell (BMC) transfer has been shown to improve global function and remodeling. The present study examines the effect of BMC transfer on regional remodeling and function after myocardial infarction by cMRI., Design: Fifty-four patients of the MR substudy of the REPAIR-AMI trial have been studied at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Enddiastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and wall thickening (WT%) have been measured on SSFP cine sequences., Results: Enddiastolic wall thickness decreased in both placebo and BMC groups in viable as well as infarcted segments. The effect was largest in the pre-specified subgroup of patients below the median EF of 48.9% (infarcted segments -1.14 mm Placebo vs. -1.91 mm BMC, p for interaction 0.01, remote segments -0.19 mm Placebo vs. -0.94 mm BMC, p for interaction 0.00001). Corrected for baseline values BMC therapy yielded smaller EDWT at 12 months in infarcted and remote segments (infarcted 7.58 mm Placebo vs. 6.13 mm BMC p = 0.0001, remote 8.76 mm Placebo vs. 7.32 mm BMC, p = 0.0001). This was associated with better contractility within the infarcted segments among BMC patients (WT% 24.17% Placebo vs. 49.31% BMC, p = 0.0001). The WT% was inversely correlated with EDWT (r = -0.37, p = 0.0001)., Conclusion: Bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy yields smaller EDWT when compared with placebo patients suggesting a positive effect on maladaptive hypertrophy of viable myocardium. This notion is supported by the enhanced regional contractility within the BMC group which is inversely correlated with EDWT.

Background: Guidelines for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommend primary PCI as first choice therapy. This recommendation has been linked to defined time limits achievable in a logistic network for the treatment of ACS. In the present study we analyzed the difference in 6 months outcome between STEMI patients who were admitted directly to a PCI center and those requiring transfer for primary PCI., Results: 2,034 consecutive patients were included in the Bad Nauheim ACS registry. Admission diagnosis was STEMI in 1,057 (52%) patients (71% male, aged 63 ± 13). 637 (60%) patients were directly admitted for primary PCI with a time delay from first medical contact until admission in the PCI center of 64 min (IQR 45-90) at median and door-to-balloon time (DTB) at median 29 min (IQR 20-41). 420 (40%) patients were transferred from peripheral hospitals. In this subgroup time delay was 135 min (IQR 69-285) and DTB at median 31 min (IQR 22-49). 178 (16.8%) patients were at high risk (CPR or cardiogenic shock). Patients, who were admitted directly had a better outcome as transferral patients (log rank 6.1; p = 0.013 for 6 months mortality). However, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log rank 4.25; p = 0.039) and Cox regression analysis (95% CI 1.08-3.17; p = 0.026) revealed that this difference in outcome was restricted to high-risk patients., Conclusion: A network for the treatment of STEMI provides the logistic basis for the initiation of primary PCI according to current guidelines. However, transferral patients do not meet the defined time limits. Mortality rates for high-risk transferral patients appear to be higher as those of patients taken directly to the center by the EMS.

Background: The most recent ESC guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) recommend the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in high risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), particularly in diabetics. Little is known about the adherence to these guidelines within Europe., Methods and Results: Between May 2005 and April 2008 a total of 47,407 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled into the PCI-Registry of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. In the present analysis we examined the use of GPI in 2,922 diabetics who underwent PCI for NSTE-ACS. In this high risk population only 22.2% received a GPI; 8.9% upstream and 13.4% during PCI. The strategy of the individual institution had a major impact on the usage of GPI. In the multiple regression analysis clinical instability and complex lesion characteristics were strong independent determinants for the use of GPI, whereas renal insufficiency was negatively associated with its use. After adjustment for confounding variables no significant differences in hospital mortality could be observed between the cohorts, but a significantly higher rate of non-fatal postprocedural myocardial infarction was observed among patients receiving GPI upstream., Conclusions: Despite the recommendation for its use in the current ESC guidelines, only a minority of the diabetics in Europe undergoing PCI for NSTE-ACS received a GPI. The use of GPI was mainly triggered by high-risk interventional scenarios.

Aims: Restenosis in bare-metal stents is in part related to stent design and material. Optimized strut design of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) stents may yield nearly comparable results to drug-eluting stents (DES) in selected lesions. The prospective multicenter DaVinci registry investigates the clinical outcome of a CoCr coronary stent (MULTI-LINK VISION), particularly in terms of patients with diabetes and complex lesions (B1, B2, C)., Methods and Results: The prospective internet-based registry included 1,344 patients (76% males, aged 66 +/- 10 years) undergoing stent implantation (n = 1,642) in 32 centres from July 2003 to June 2004. Follow-up data (median 9 +/- 1 months) of this cohort were available for 1,289 patients (98.1%). Of these patients 327 (26.2%) were diabetics. In total, 1,429 de-novo lesions (A 11.9%, B1 47.7%, B2 31.6%, C 8.8%) were treated with the CoCr stent. The predefined primary endpoint was defined as a composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) by coronary bypass graft (CABG) or PCI at 270 days (target vessel failure, TVF). Secondary endpoints include death, time to the first myocardial infarction, TVR and CABG. The cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 12.4% with 0.8% deaths, 1.5% non-fatal MI, and 9.7% TVR. TVF in the overall cohort was documented in 137 (10.8%) patients. For diabetics and complex lesions TVF was 13.8% (95% CI 4.2-18) and 11.4% (95% CI 2.0-13.3), respectively., Conclusion: This large registry confirms good acute and long-term success of CoCr stents making this strategy valuable, particularly in a special cohort (diabetics and complex lesions) as long as late stent thrombosis with DES plays a role and short-term antiplatelet therapy is favoured.

Background: The drug eluting stents have been shown to play a substantial role in preventing in-stent restenosis. This study was initiated to determine the efficacy of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) in an in-stent restenosis model for reducing neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stent placement., Methods: In a porcine overstretch model, three kinds of stents were investigated (n = 12 per group): bare metal stents (BMS), rapamycin-eluted stents (RES), and BMS after intracoronary short-term application of 2-DG (DGS). After 42 days histomorphometric and histopathological analyses were performed., Results: Neointimal thickness (BMS: 0.38 +/- 0.08, RES: 0.24 +/- 0.11, DGS: 0.15 +/- 0.01), area stenosis (BMS: 47.39 +/- 2.76, RES: 32.2 +/- 2.08, DGS: 29.30 +/- 2.98) did not differ after 42 days between the RES and DGS but were significantly lower as compared to BMS only. Lumen area (BMS: 3.15 +/- 1.53, RES: 4.37 +/- 1.72, DGS: 4.77 +/- 2.14) was significantly higher in the DGS group in comparison to the BMS group. The calculated injury and inflammation scores were similar and re-endothelialization was confirmed in all groups., Conclusions: This study could demonstrate that in porcine stent model neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization after application of 2-DG are comparable to those seen in RES. Thus, 2-DG might be a promising clinical application for coronary stent coating.

Summaries and commentaries on trials presented at the hotline sessions of the scientific sessions 2008 of the American Heart Association in New Orleans have been generated from the oral presentations and the webcasts of the American Heart Association. The following papers are discussed: APPROACH, ATLAS, BACH, BICC, HF-ACTION, I-PRESERVE, JPAD, JUPITER, Mass-DAC, Physicians' Health Study II, SEARCH, tailored clopidogrel loading to prevent stent thrombosis, and TIMACS.