1. Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- Author
-
Holger Nef, Matthias Willmer, Arnaud Van Linden, Andreas Rolf, Jürgen Leick, Helge Möllmann, Sebastian Szardien, Thomas Walther, Christian W. Hamm, Christoph Liebetrau, Johannes Blumenstein, Matthias Arlt, and Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,endocrine system ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Extracorporeal ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Time-to-Treatment ,Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ,Patient Admission ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Hospital Mortality ,Survival rate ,Aged ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Retrospective Studies ,Chi-Square Distribution ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Retrospective cohort study ,Stroke Volume ,General Medicine ,Stroke volume ,Recovery of Function ,Middle Aged ,Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ,Survival Rate ,Treatment Outcome ,Multivariate Analysis ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Chi-squared distribution ,Clinical death ,Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - Abstract
This study aimed to identify predictors of mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) undergoing in-hospital extracorporeal life support system (ECLS) treatment.We retrospectively studied the characteristics and clinical outcomes of 28 patients (January 2010 and December 2011) with OHCA and veno-arterial ECLS implemented during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) upon admission to the cath lab. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined after ECLS implantation and then every 24 h during and after successful weaning from ECLS.Overall 30-day survival rate was 39.3 % (11 of 28 patients). Baseline characteristics, initial laboratory measurements, and LVEF on admission were not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. There was no difference regarding median CPR duration [survivors 44.0 min (IQR 31.0-45.0) vs. non-survivors 53.0 min (IQR 40.0-61.3); P = 0.23]. Door-to-ECLS implantation time was significantly longer in non-survivors [42.5 min (IQR 28.0-56.5) vs. 25.0 min (IQR 21.0-30.0); P0.01]. ECLS treatment duration was not significantly different between the two groups [survivors: 4.0 days (IQR 1.5-7.5) vs. non-survivors 6.5 days (IQR 1.0-8.0); P = 0.69]. LVEF significantly improved in survivors during ECLS treatment (mean ± SD survivor 47.5 ± 14.7 % vs. non-survivor 23.3 ± 14.9 %; P0.01). The door-to-ECLS implantation time was the only significant and independent predictor of 30-day mortality in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a benefit favouring patients with a door-to-ECLS implantation time30 min (log rank 6.29; P = 0.01).A door-to-ECLS implantation time30 min significantly improves 30-day outcomes in patients with OHCA.
- Published
- 2013