Search

Rationale: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an effective treatment in obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) but there is paucity of evidence in OHS patients without severe OSA phenotype. Methods: In this multicentre (16 sites in Spain), open-label parallel group clinical trial, we randomly assigned 98 stable ambulatory patients with untreated OHS and apnoea-hypopnoea index Results:49 patients were randomised in each group and 48 patients were analysed in each one of them. During a median [IQR] follow-up of 4.98 [2.98; 6.62] years, mean (SD) hospitalization days/year was 2.60 (5.31) in the control group and 2.71 (4.52) in the NIV group [adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) 1.07 (0.44; 2.59) (p = 0.882)]. Cardiovascular events occurred in 11 (23%) participants in the control group and 10 (21%) in the NIV group (hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.96 (0.40;2.30), p=0.927). Similar results were observed in the per-protocol analysis [rate ratio (95% CI) 1.21 (0.43;3.41) (p=0.717)]. Death occurred in 9 (19%) participants in both arms (adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.07 (0.41;2.82), p=0.893). Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis [rate ratio (95% CI) 1.38 (0.50;3.79) (p=0.529)]. Conclusion: In stable ambulatory patients with OHS without severe OSA, NIV and lifestyle modification had similar long-term hospitalization days-year. Larger studies are necessary to better determine the long-term benefit of NIV in this subgroup of OHS.

Rationale: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) has been associated with cardiac dysfunction. However, randomized trials have assessing the impact of long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP on cardiac structure and function assessed by echocardiography are lacking. Methods: In a pre-specified secondary analysis of the largest multicenter randomized controlled trial of OHS〔Pickwick project, n=221 patient with OHS and coexistent severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)〕, we compared the effectiveness of 3 years of NIV and CPAP on structural and functional echocardiographic changes. At baseline and annually during 3 sequential years patients underwent transthoracic two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography. Echocardiographers were blinded to the treatment allocation. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model with a treatment group/repeated measures interaction to determine the differential effect between CPAP and NIV. Results:196 patients were analyzed, 102 treated with CPAP and 94 treated with NIV. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 40.5±1.47 mmHg at baseline to 35.3±1.33 mmHg at 3 years with CPAP and from 41.5±1.56 mmHg to 35.5±1.42 with NIV (p Conclusion: In patients with OHS and concomitant severe OSA, long-term treatment with NIV and CPAP led to similar degrees of improvement in pulmonary hypertension and LVDF.

Rationale: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is commonly treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP. NIV is more complex and costly but provides ventilatory support. To date there have been no long-term or cost trials comparing these treatment modalities. Methods: We performed a large, randomized, multicenter, open-label controlled trial in Spain to compare the long-term effectiveness of NIV and CPAP using hospitalization days/year-patient as the primary end point. We carried out a simple cost analysis including effectiveness cost during 3 year of follow-up. We included the following cost groups: visits, adjustment of NIV, tests, medication, therapies and hospital resources utilization. A sensitivity analysis was conducted according to 3 different scenarios guided by the International Gross Domestic Product. Results: In total, 215 patients with untreated OHS and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were randomized to NIV or CPAP therapy and followed at least 3 years. The effectiveness was close between arms (mean difference NIV-CPAP: -0.19, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.75). The cost per patient/year was lower in the CPAP arm (1,898.2€; SD 1939.5) than the cost in the NIV arm (2,809.3€; SD 2901.6), mean difference -911.1€ (p Conclusions: In stable patients with OHS and severe OSA, despite NIV having a slight advantage in effectiveness, CPAP could be considered the first line of treatment due to its lower cost but, a case-by-case assessment is recommended to detect patients who would benefit from a switch to NIV.

Rationale: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is commonly treated with CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). NIV is more complex and costly but it provides ventilatory support. To date there have been no long-term trials comparing these treatment modalities. Methods: We performed a large, multicenter, open-label controlled trial in Spain to compare the long-term effectiveness of NIV and CPAP: respiratory function, Epworth sleepness scale (ESS), other clinical symptoms, blood pressure (BP) and health related quality of life (HRQL). The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: In total, 215 patients with untreated OHS and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSH) were randomized to NIV or CPAP therapy and followed at least 3 years. PaCO2, bicarbonate and pH improved significantly with both treatments without group differences. FEV1 and FVC improved with positive airway pressure (PAP) but without significant group differences. The 6-MWD test did not improve with either PAP modality and there were no significant group differences. ESS and other clinical symptoms like dyspnea or unrefreshing sleep improved similarly with CPAP and NIV therapy. Both systolic and diastolic BP improved significantly with PAP but without group differences. HRQL tests (SF-36 physical and mental, FOSQ and VAWS) improved with PAP without any significant group differences. Conclusions: In stable patients with OHS and severe OSA, NIV and CPAP have similar long-term effectiveness improving respiratory function, symptoms, BP and HRQL. Given that CPAP has lower complexity and cost, CPAP may be the preferred treatment modality until more studies become available.